Graphics card rankings
Each table is one benchmark at one version. There is no overall score: different benchmarks measure different things.
Rendering and compute
Blender Benchmark 2.83
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · lower is better
| # | Model | Chart | s | Of leader | At launch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 71 | 100% | $999 | |
| 2 | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 93 | 77% | $699 | |
| 3 | GeForce RTX 2080 | 93 | 76% | $699 | |
| 4 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 94 | 76% | $499 | |
| 5 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 124 | 57% | $699 | |
| 6 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 126 | 56% | $399 | |
| 7 | GeForce RTX 2070 | 130 | 55% | $499 | |
| 8 | GeForce RTX 2060 | 133 | 53% | — | |
| 9 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 177 | 40% | $279 | |
| 10 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 177 | 40% | $229 | |
| 11 | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 181 | 39% | $399 | |
| 12 | GeForce GTX 1080 | 184 | 39% | — | |
| 13 | GeForce GTX 1660 | 194 | 37% | $219 | |
| 14 | GeForce GTX 1070 | 213 | 33% | $379 | |
| 15 | GeForce GTX 1650 | 295 | 24% | $149 | |
| 16 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 504 | 14% | $139 |
No ranking data yet for: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
How the difference is calculated is explained in the methodology.