NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 6 GB GDDR6
- 120 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 55 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 5% of the leader
- Launch price
- $279
- MSRP, US
- Release
- February 21, 2019
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
1,104.21 s
lower is better
Median of 9 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,122.56 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
84.2 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 22GeForce GTX 108081
- 23GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER82
- 24GeForce GTX 1660 Ti84
- 25GeForce GTX 107090
- 26GeForce GTX 970114
Median of 43 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 97.26 s | 17 of 19 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 94.2 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 98.56 s | 17 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 92.37 s | 12 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 91.68 s | 13 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 90.53 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 90.24 s | 10 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
74.21 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 11GeForce RTX 206035
- 12GeForce GTX 1080 Ti61
- 13GeForce GTX 1660 Ti74
- 14GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER77
- 15GeForce GTX 108087
Median of 25 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 78.01 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 72.26 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 74.47 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
300.38 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 22 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 341.45 s | 14 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 338.74 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 333.42 s | 17 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 328.04 s | 12 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 322.2 s | 12 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 330.96 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 332.99 s | 9 of 11 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
307.05 s
lower is better
Median of 9 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 289.83 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 302.33 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 298.02 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
169.5 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 16GeForce GTX 1080 Ti124
- 17GeForce RTX 2060133
- 18GeForce GTX 1660 Ti170
- 19GeForce GTX 1080187
- 20GeForce GTX 1070211
Median of 21 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 183.88 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 169.47 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 185.59 s | 14 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 177.1 s | 9 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 173.34 s | 10 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 166.19 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 168.26 s | 8 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
165.41 s
lower is better
Median of 5 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 158.6 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 148.78 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 146.31 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA)
297.99 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 13GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER288
- 14GeForce GTX 1070 Ti296
- 15GeForce GTX 1660 Ti298
- 16GeForce GTX 1080309
- 17GeForce GTX 1660329
Median of 77 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 269.07 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 286.16 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 275.01 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 302.43 s | 9 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 284.91 s | 9 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 286.47 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 288.55 s | 8 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
229.99 s
lower is better
Median of 5 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 182.02 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 182.52 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
577.55 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 16GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q549
- 17GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER564
- 18GeForce GTX 1660 Ti578
- 19GeForce GTX 1070604
- 20GeForce GTX 1660607
Median of 82 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 481.39 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 538.15 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 528.2 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 546.65 s | 12 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 543.83 s | 11 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 548.62 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 546.13 s | 9 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
454.75 s
lower is better
Median of 6 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 427.02 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 429.12 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA)
709.34 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 14GeForce GTX 1070 Ti693
- 15GeForce GTX 1080704
- 16GeForce GTX 1660 Ti709
- 17GeForce GTX 1660782
- 18GeForce GTX 1070800
Median of 77 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 706.21 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 805.08 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 684.32 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 708.44 s | 10 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 704.25 s | 10 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 712.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 718.65 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
690.12 s
lower is better
Median of 5 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 598.24 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 585.42 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
777 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 774 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 971 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 908 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 850 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 898 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 884 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 851 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
753 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 58 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (18)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 686 samples/min | 43 of 48 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 703 samples/min | 44 of 46 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 699 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 687 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 754 samples/min | 50 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 766 samples/min | 43 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 763 samples/min | 41 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 789 samples/min | 39 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 782 samples/min | 40 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 854 samples/min | 41 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 862 samples/min | 35 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 825 samples/min | 34 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 826 samples/min | 29 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 811 samples/min | 25 of 30 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 813 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2 | 876 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 821 samples/min | 28 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 888 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- TU116-400-A1
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 1,536 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,500 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,770 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 6 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR6
- Memory bus
- 192 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 288 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 120 W (TDP)
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. The card’s PCIe version is unknown.