NVIDIA · Pascal
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 8 GB GDDR5X
- 180 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 59 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 4% of the leader
- Release
- May 27, 2016
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81a
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
787.83 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 27 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 784.61 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
80.5 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 62 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 90.94 s | 15 of 19 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 92.46 s | 6 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 99.01 s | 18 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 90.73 s | 11 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 88.5 s | 11 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 88.5 s | 6 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 89.39 s | 9 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
87.3 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 59 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 88.32 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 85.97 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 87.25 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
253.47 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 46 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 272.31 s | 12 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 280.12 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 290.22 s | 10 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 285.95 s | 6 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 280.3 s | 6 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 279.85 s | 4 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 282.85 s | 6 of 11 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
304.18 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 37 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 322.83 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 310.85 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 324.84 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
186.75 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 39 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 177.22 s | 11 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 179.71 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 189.03 s | 16 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 183.7 s | 12 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 182.11 s | 11 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 176.22 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 178.02 s | 9 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
164.67 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 36 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 171.25 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 169.07 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 161.19 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA)
316.74 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 34 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 301.84 s | 11 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 302.45 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 308.61 s | 16 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 328.41 s | 11 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 341.22 s | 13 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 343.44 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 343.83 s | 9 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
189.58 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 30 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 194.36 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 247.7 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 188.09 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
460.91 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 16GeForce RTX 2070410
- 17GeForce RTX 2060438
- 18GeForce GTX 1080461
- 19GeForce GTX 1070551
- 20GeForce GTX 1650796
Median of 39 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 491.14 s | 11 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 490.48 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 525.48 s | 15 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 491.93 s | 10 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 483.26 s | 10 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 485.53 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 478.64 s | 7 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
470.52 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 31 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 484.41 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 472.77 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 465.03 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
797.7 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 28 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 759.62 s | 11 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 688.23 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 703.61 s | 15 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 707.2 s | 9 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 753.32 s | 12 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 793.26 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 748.98 s | 8 of 9 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
620.17 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 27 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 688.4 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 697.33 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 617 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
513 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (14)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 | 632 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 564 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 583 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 603 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 588 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 603 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 650 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 641 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 638 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 635 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 614 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 609 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 610 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 668 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
585 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 81 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (18)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 507 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 487 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 474 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 482 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 574 samples/min | 53 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 568 samples/min | 46 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 578 samples/min | 44 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 581 samples/min | 42 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 578 samples/min | 44 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 621 samples/min | 45 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 625 samples/min | 38 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 619 samples/min | 38 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 613 samples/min | 33 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 610 samples/min | 27 of 30 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 602 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2 | 611 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 615 samples/min | 31 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 643 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Shader units
- 2,560 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,607 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,733 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 8 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR5X
- Memory bus
- 256 bit
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 180 W (TDP)
- Interface
- PCIe 3.0 x16
Several configurations exist under this name. The table lists the shared specifications.
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. Enter the PCIe version of the motherboard slot.