GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1080: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
A +6%NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 6% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce GTX 1080 is better1
Shader units 128 more2,560 (CUDA cores) vs 2,432 (CUDA cores)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- 3.6% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti77.7 sGeForce GTX 108080.5 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
A · 78B · 810100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 3.6% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
77.7 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 76.96–78.05; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
80.5 s · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 79.51–81.58; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 1.1% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti293.5 sGeForce GTX 1080290.2 sPosition among tested models (25, CUDA)
B · 290A · 2940200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 1.1% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
293.5 s · community measurement, sample 75 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 280.96–296.59; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
290.2 s · community measurement, sample 143 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 143 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 284.58–299.98; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-04-17; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 0.8% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti187.6 sGeForce GTX 1080189 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
A · 188B · 1890200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 0.8% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
187.6 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 179.05–190.86; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
189 s · community measurement, sample 115 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 115 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 185.79–193.03; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-04-17; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 4.2% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti296 sGeForce GTX 1080308.6 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
A · 296B · 3090200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 4.2% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
296 s · community measurement, sample 52 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 52 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 283.33–300.59; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
308.6 s · community measurement, sample 105 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 105 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 303.03–314.18; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 4.5% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti502.9 sGeForce GTX 1080525.5 sPosition among tested models (23, CUDA)
A · 503B · 52505001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 4.5% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
502.9 s · community measurement, sample 52 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 52 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 479.86–509.1; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
525.5 s · community measurement, sample 114 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 114 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 516.26–539.09; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 1.6% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti692.6 sGeForce GTX 1080703.6 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
A · 693B · 70405001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 1.6% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
692.6 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 663.89–711.48; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
703.6 s · community measurement, sample 100 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 100 submissions (16 outliers excluded), interquartile range 690.88–715.17; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 1.1% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti591.6 samples/minGeForce GTX 1080584.9 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
B · 585A · 59205,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. The 1.1% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
591.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 582.59–600.66; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-04-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
584.9 samples/min · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 570.45–627.62; submissions 2025-07-29 to 2026-08-29; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (20)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 88.4 | 88.5 | A +0.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 86.8 | 89.4 | A +3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 88 | 88.5 | A +0.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 89.3 | 90.7 | A +1.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 96.2 | 99 | A +2.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 286.5 | 279.9 | B +2.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 285.5 | 280.3 | B +1.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 286.1 | 285.9 | B +0% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 182.2 | 182.1 | B +0% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 180.9 | 183.7 | A +1.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 338 | 341.2 | A +0.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 474.3 | 483.3 | A +1.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 485.9 | 491.9 | A +1.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 714.3 | 753.3 | A +5.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 633.8 | 614.9 | A +3.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 635.3 | 613.3 | A +3.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 639.7 | 619.2 | A +3.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 662.4 | 624.9 | A +6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 635.4 | 621.3 | A +2.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 596.6 | 577.8 | A +3.3% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (81)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 802.3 | 784.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 802.9 | 787.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 89.7 | 92.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 89.9 | 90.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 90 | 87.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 88.9 | 87.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 89.5 | 86 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 91.7 | 88.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 284.4 | 282.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 274.6 | 280.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 280 | 272.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 253.8 | 253.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 325.3 | 304.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 338.1 | 310.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 328.2 | 322.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 176.7 | 176.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 178.2 | 178 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 176.6 | 179.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 178.1 | 177.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 181.7 | 186.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 168.7 | 164.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 175 | 169.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 178.8 | 171.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 340.9 | 343.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 341.7 | 343.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 327.8 | 328.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 291.9 | 302.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 295.3 | 301.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 300.5 | 316.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 195.9 | 189.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 281.2 | 247.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 206.8 | 194.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 480.4 | 485.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 472.5 | 478.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 471.7 | 490.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 483.3 | 491.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 447.2 | 460.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 475.9 | 470.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 491.7 | 472.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 501.4 | 484.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 773 | 793.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 750.1 | 749 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 690.6 | 707.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 668.2 | 688.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 745.5 | 759.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 734.5 | 797.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 650.3 | 620.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 751.1 | 697.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 701.6 | 688.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 687.1 | 609.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 674.9 | 613.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 652.1 | 635.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 667.3 | 638 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 663.7 | 640.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 684 | 650.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 592.8 | 577.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 495 | 486.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 513.6 | 506.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 658.3 | 643 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 662.6 | 601.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 614.7 | 609.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 599.7 | 581.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 590.9 | 567.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 587.9 | 574.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 506.8 | 474 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 324.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 161.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 188.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 465 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 617 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 668 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 608.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 602.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 588.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 603.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 582.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 564.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 632.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 512.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 611 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 482.1 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | B · GeForce GTX 1080 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GP104-300-A1 | no data | no data for B |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,432 (CUDA cores) | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | B: 128 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,607 MHz | 1,607 MHz | equal |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,683 MHz | 1,733 MHz | B: 50 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 256.3 GB/s | no data | no data for B |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 180 W (TDP) | 180 W (TDP) | equal |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | equal |
Chip
GPU chip
AGP104-300-A1
Bno data
no data for BArchitecture
APascal
BPascal
equalShader units
A2,432 (CUDA cores)
B2,560 (CUDA cores)
B: 128 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,607 MHz
B1,607 MHz
equalBoost clock
A1,683 MHz
B1,733 MHz
B: 50 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR5
BGDDR5X
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A256.3 GB/s
Bno data
no data for BExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A180 W (TDP)
B180 W (TDP)
equalTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
BPCIe 3.0 x16
equal
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti: 8 GB GDDR5, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080: 8 GB GDDR5X, 256-bit bus.
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti: PCIe 3.0 x16. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080: PCIe 3.0 x16.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.