NVIDIA · Pascal
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 8 GB GDDR5
- 180 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 58 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 4% of the leader
- Launch price
- $399
- MSRP, US
- Release
- November 2, 2017
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
802.32 s
lower is better
Median of 12 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 802.95 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
77.67 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 20 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 89.91 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 89.66 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 96.22 s | 16 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 89.33 s | 9 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 88 s | 10 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 88.38 s | 5 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 86.78 s | 8 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
91.7 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 89.52 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 88.93 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 90.02 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
293.52 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 9GeForce GTX 1080 Ti198
- 10GeForce GTX 1080290
- 11GeForce GTX 1070 Ti294
- 12GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER301
- 13GeForce GTX 980 Ti308
Median of 75 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 253.84 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 280.01 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 274.65 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 286.05 s | 7 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 285.5 s | 7 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 286.47 s | 5 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 284.35 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
328.21 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 338.13 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 325.26 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
187.58 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 13GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER181
- 14GeForce GTX 1660 Ti186
- 15GeForce GTX 1070 Ti188
- 16GeForce GTX 1080189
- 17GeForce GTX 980 Ti195
Median of 56 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 181.68 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 178.07 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 176.59 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 180.89 s | 11 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 182.19 s | 12 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 176.75 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 178.23 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
178.78 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 175 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 168.7 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA)
296.04 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 12GeForce RTX 2060252
- 13GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER288
- 14GeForce GTX 1070 Ti296
- 15GeForce GTX 1660 Ti298
- 16GeForce GTX 1080309
Median of 52 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 300.49 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 295.29 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 291.87 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 327.79 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 338.02 s | 12 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 340.89 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 341.72 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
206.76 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 281.22 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 195.9 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
502.92 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 12GeForce RTX 2060494
- 13GeForce GTX 980 Ti498
- 14GeForce GTX 1070 Ti503
- 15GeForce GTX 1080525
- 16GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q549
Median of 52 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 447.24 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 483.33 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 471.72 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 485.89 s | 9 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 474.27 s | 8 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 480.35 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 472.5 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
501.38 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 491.73 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 475.86 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA)
692.62 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 12GeForce RTX 2060588
- 13GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER691
- 14GeForce GTX 1070 Ti693
- 15GeForce GTX 1080704
- 16GeForce GTX 1660 Ti709
Median of 46 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 734.52 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 745.49 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 668.2 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 690.56 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 714.29 s | 11 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 772.99 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 750.08 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
701.61 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 751.13 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 650.31 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
684 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (5)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 664 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 667 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 652 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 675 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 687 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
592 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 56GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop GPU747
- 57GeForce GTX 1660680
- 58GeForce GTX 1070 Ti592
- 59GeForce GTX 1080585
- 60GeForce GTX 1070524
Median of 24 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (16)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 514 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 495 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 507 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 588 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 591 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 593 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 600 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 597 samples/min | 43 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 635 samples/min | 44 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 662 samples/min | 37 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 640 samples/min | 37 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 635 samples/min | 32 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 615 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 663 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 634 samples/min | 30 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 658 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- GP104-300-A1
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Shader units
- 2,432 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,607 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,683 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 8 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR5
- Memory bus
- 256 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 256.3 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 180 W (TDP)
- Interface
- PCIe 3.0 x16
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. Enter the PCIe version of the motherboard slot.