GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +51.5%NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 51.5% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is better2
Board power 70 W lower180 W (TDP) vs 250 W (TDP)
Launch price $300 lower$399 vs $699
Where GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is better11
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 38.2% lower56 s vs 78 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 48.3% lower198 s vs 294 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 47.2% lower127 s vs 188 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 36.6% lower217 s vs 296 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 40.1% lower359 s vs 503 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 46.6% lower472 s vs 693 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 38.9% faster821 samples/min vs 592 samples/min
Shader units 1,152 more3,584 (CUDA cores) vs 2,432 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 3 GB more11 GB vs 8 GB
Memory bus 96 bit more352 bit vs 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 228.1 GB/s more484.4 GB/s vs 256.3 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 38.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti77.7 sGeForce GTX 1080 Ti56.2 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 56A · 780100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 38.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
77.7 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 76.96–78.05; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
56.2 s · community measurement, sample 76 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 76 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 55.4–57.39; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 48.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti293.5 sGeForce GTX 1080 Ti197.9 sPosition among tested models (25, CUDA)
B · 198A · 2940200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 48.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
293.5 s · community measurement, sample 75 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 280.96–296.59; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
197.9 s · community measurement, sample 199 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 199 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 192.68–204.4; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 47.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti187.6 sGeForce GTX 1080 Ti127.4 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 127A · 1880200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 47.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
187.6 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 179.05–190.86; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
127.4 s · community measurement, sample 166 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 166 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 124.67–130.48; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 36.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti296 sGeForce GTX 1080 Ti216.7 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 217A · 2960200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 36.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
296 s · community measurement, sample 52 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 52 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 283.33–300.59; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
216.7 s · community measurement, sample 151 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 151 submissions (24 outliers excluded), interquartile range 213.35–220.93; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 40.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti502.9 sGeForce GTX 1080 Ti359 sPosition among tested models (23, CUDA)
B · 359A · 50305001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 40.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
502.9 s · community measurement, sample 52 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 52 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 479.86–509.1; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
359 s · community measurement, sample 157 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 157 submissions (19 outliers excluded), interquartile range 352.55–366.03; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 46.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti692.6 sGeForce GTX 1080 Ti472.4 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 472A · 69305001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 46.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
692.6 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 663.89–711.48; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
472.4 s · community measurement, sample 155 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 155 submissions (17 outliers excluded), interquartile range 463.04–482.59; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 38.9%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti591.6 samples/minGeForce GTX 1080 Ti821.4 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 592B · 82105,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 38.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
591.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 582.59–600.66; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-04-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
821.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 57 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 57 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 808.6–840.55; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-07; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (20)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 88.4 | 62.5 | B +41.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 86.8 | 63.2 | B +37.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 88 | 62.2 | B +41.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 89.3 | 64.1 | B +39.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 96.2 | 69.9 | B +37.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 286.5 | 189.1 | B +51.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 285.5 | 192.3 | B +48.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 286.1 | 194.8 | B +46.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 182.2 | 123.4 | B +47.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 180.9 | 124.1 | B +45.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 338 | 245.2 | B +37.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 474.3 | 329.7 | B +43.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 485.9 | 337.5 | B +44% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 714.3 | 487.7 | B +46.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 633.8 | 868 | B +37% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 635.3 | 878.4 | B +38.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 639.7 | 879.8 | B +37.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 662.4 | 889.7 | B +34.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 635.4 | 889.8 | B +40% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 596.6 | 830.7 | B +39.2% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (78)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 802.3 | 529.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 802.9 | 532.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 89.7 | 65.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 89.9 | 64.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 90 | 61.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 88.9 | 61.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 89.5 | 61.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 91.7 | 62.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 284.4 | 192.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 274.6 | 193.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 280 | 185 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 253.8 | 172 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 325.3 | 212.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 338.1 | 221.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 328.2 | 221.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 176.7 | 119.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 178.2 | 121.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 176.6 | 122.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 178.1 | 119.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 181.7 | 124.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 168.7 | 115.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 175 | 119.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 178.8 | 117.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 340.9 | 245.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 341.7 | 248.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 327.8 | 236 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 291.9 | 214.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 295.3 | 213.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 300.5 | 220.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 195.9 | 132.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 281.2 | 172.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 206.8 | 135.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 480.4 | 331 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 472.5 | 330.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 471.7 | 341.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 483.3 | 334.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 447.2 | 310.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 475.9 | 330.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 491.7 | 333.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 501.4 | 334.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 773 | 493.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 750.1 | 491.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 690.6 | 478.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 668.2 | 460.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 745.5 | 521.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 734.5 | 521.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 650.3 | 447.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 751.1 | 480.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 701.6 | 462.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 687.1 | 873.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 674.9 | 976.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 652.1 | 931.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 667.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 663.7 | 928.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 684 | 960.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 592.8 | 821.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 495 | 685.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 513.6 | 699.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 658.3 | 935.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 662.6 | 888.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 614.7 | 883.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 599.7 | 842.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 590.9 | 829 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 587.9 | 820.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 506.8 | 695.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 216.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 115.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 133.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 326.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 436.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 936.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 895.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 886.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 905.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 925.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 969.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 780.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 726.9 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | B · GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GP104-300-A1 | GP102-350-K1-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,432 (CUDA cores) | 3,584 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,152 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,607 MHz | 1,481 MHz | A: 126 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,683 MHz | 1,582 MHz | A: 101 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 11 GB | B: 3 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 352 bit | B: 96 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 256.3 GB/s | 484.4 GB/s | B: 228.1 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 180 W (TDP) | 250 W (TDP) | B: 70 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | equal |
Chip
GPU chip
AGP104-300-A1
BGP102-350-K1-A1
differsArchitecture
APascal
BPascal
equalShader units
A2,432 (CUDA cores)
B3,584 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,152 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,607 MHz
B1,481 MHz
A: 126 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,683 MHz
B1,582 MHz
A: 101 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B11 GB
B: 3 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR5
BGDDR5X
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B352 bit
B: 96 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A256.3 GB/s
B484.4 GB/s
B: 228.1 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A180 W (TDP)
B250 W (TDP)
B: 70 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
BPCIe 3.0 x16
equal
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti: 8 GB GDDR5, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: 11 GB GDDR5X, 352-bit bus.
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti: PCIe 3.0 x16. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: PCIe 3.0 x16.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.