GeForce GTX 1080 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +319.2%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in this scenario (up to 319.2% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1080 is better1
Board power 35 W lower180 W (TDP) vs 215 W (TDP)
Where GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is better14
Blender Benchmark 2.81a 40.8% lower559 s vs 788 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 78.2% lower45 s vs 81 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 238.8% lower26 s vs 87 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 62.7% lower156 s vs 253 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 201.3% lower101 s vs 304 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 106.6% lower90 s vs 187 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 262.2% lower45 s vs 165 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 114.4% lower148 s vs 317 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 91.9% lower99 s vs 190 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 79.6% lower257 s vs 461 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 265.4% lower129 s vs 471 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 107.3% lower385 s vs 798 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 304.4% lower153 s vs 620 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 282% faster2,235 samples/min vs 585 samples/min
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 40.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.81a
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080787.8 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER559.4 sPosition among tested models (5, CUDA)
B · 559A · 78805001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 40.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
787.8 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 763.6–810.47; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
559.4 s · community measurement, sample 23 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 23 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 555.03–568.44; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 78.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 108080.5 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.2 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 45A · 810100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 78.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
80.5 s · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 79.51–81.58; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.2 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.61–45.89; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 238.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 108087.3 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER25.8 sPosition among tested models (17, OptiX)
B · 26A · 87050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 238.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
87.3 s · community measurement, sample 59 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 59 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 85.25–89.44; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-02-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
25.8 s · community measurement, sample 179 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 179 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 25.03–26.32; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-08-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 62.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080253.5 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER155.8 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 156A · 2530200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 62.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
253.5 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 247.41–262.04; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
155.8 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 153.23–158.95; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 201.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080304.2 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER101 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 101A · 3040100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 201.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
304.2 s · community measurement, sample 37 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 37 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 288.99–319.36; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-03-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
101 s · community measurement, sample 148 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 148 submissions (17 outliers excluded), interquartile range 99.16–102.19; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 106.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080186.8 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER90.4 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 90A · 1870100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 106.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
186.8 s · community measurement, sample 39 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 181.33–191.2; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
90.4 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.69–91.7; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 262.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080164.7 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 45A · 1650100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 262.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
164.7 s · community measurement, sample 36 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 36 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 160.59–169.04; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-02-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.5 s · community measurement, sample 115 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 115 submissions (24 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.86–45.95; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 114.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080316.7 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER147.7 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 148A · 3170200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 114.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
316.7 s · community measurement, sample 34 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 34 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 310.65–323.27; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
147.7 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.41–149.78; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 91.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080189.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER98.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 99A · 1900100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 91.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
189.6 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 183.3–193.47; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-02-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
98.8 s · community measurement, sample 122 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 122 submissions (18 outliers excluded), interquartile range 97.1–100.18; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 79.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080460.9 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER256.6 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 257A · 4610200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 79.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
460.9 s · community measurement, sample 39 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 450.31–469.8; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
256.6 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 254.13–262.18; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 265.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080470.5 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER128.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 129A · 4710200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 265.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
470.5 s · community measurement, sample 31 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 31 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 459.93–483.38; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-02-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
128.8 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 126.86–131.25; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 107.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080797.7 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER384.8 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 385A · 79802505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 107.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
797.7 s · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 28 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 789.1–813.67; submissions 2021-07-20 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
384.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 379–393.16; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 304.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080620.2 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER153.3 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 153A · 6200200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 304.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
620.2 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 605.08–634.17; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-02-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
153.3 s · community measurement, sample 115 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 115 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 150.54–157.53; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 282%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1080584.9 samples/minGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER2,234.5 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 585B · 2,23505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 282% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
584.9 samples/min · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 570.45–627.62; submissions 2025-07-29 to 2026-08-29; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2,234.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2150.53–2296.29; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-11-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (43)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 88.5 | 49.3 | B +79.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 89.4 | 49.1 | B +81.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 88.5 | 49.9 | B +77.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 90.7 | 50.5 | B +79.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 99 | 54.4 | B +81.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 90.9 | 52.2 | B +74.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 279.9 | 168.4 | B +66.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 282.8 | 169.4 | B +67% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 280.3 | 165.2 | B +69.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 285.9 | 168 | B +70.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 290.2 | 171.7 | B +69% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 272.3 | 177.3 | B +53.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 178 | 88.1 | B +102.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 182.1 | 90.9 | B +100.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 183.7 | 93.7 | B +96% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 189 | 99 | B +90.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 177.2 | 96.4 | B +83.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 343.8 | 154 | B +123.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 341.2 | 153.3 | B +122.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 328.4 | 161.1 | B +103.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 308.6 | 165.1 | B +86.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 301.8 | 157.8 | B +91.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 478.6 | 288.2 | B +66.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 483.3 | 290.1 | B +66.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 491.9 | 290.6 | B +69.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 525.5 | 305.5 | B +72% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 491.1 | 285.3 | B +72.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 749 | 383.5 | B +95.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 753.3 | 377.2 | B +99.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 707.2 | 383.5 | B +84.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 703.6 | 376.9 | B +86.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 759.6 | 434.6 | B +74.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 577.6 | 2,189.4 | B +279.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 614.9 | 2,427.4 | B +294.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 609.8 | 2,447.3 | B +301.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 613.3 | 2,467.7 | B +302.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 619.2 | 2,394.9 | B +286.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 624.9 | 2,619 | B +319.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 621.3 | 2,604.6 | B +319.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 577.8 | 2,374.9 | B +311.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 581.4 | 2,262.8 | B +289.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 567.9 | 2,228.4 | B +292.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 574.2 | 2,225.8 | B +287.7% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (78)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 784.6 | 574.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 92.5 | 51.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 87.3 | 26.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 86 | 26.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 88.3 | 29.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 280.1 | 172.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 324.8 | 100.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 310.9 | 103 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 322.8 | 104.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 176.2 | 88 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 179.7 | 91.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 161.2 | 45.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 169.1 | 51.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 171.2 | 50.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 343.4 | 153.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 302.5 | 154.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 188.1 | 98.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 247.7 | 172.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 194.4 | 104.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 485.5 | 287.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 490.5 | 283.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 465 | 129.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 472.8 | 130.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 484.4 | 135.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 793.3 | 382.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 688.2 | 360.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 617 | 152 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 697.3 | 192 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 688.4 | 183.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 668 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 609.6 | 1,556.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 608.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 613.6 | 1,531.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 635.2 | 1,580.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 638 | 1,546.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 640.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 650.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 602.9 | 1,562.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 588.3 | 1,569.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 603.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 582.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 564.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 632.4 | 1,460.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 512.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 486.9 | 2,143.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 506.9 | 2,079.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 643 | 2,522.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 611 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 601.6 | 2,413.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 482.1 | 2,072.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 474 | 2,123.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 970.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 979.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 26.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 27.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 26.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 25.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 101.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 101.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 100.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 100 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 43.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 43.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 44.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 43.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 82 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 83.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 80.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 79.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 130.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 132.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 131.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 128.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 167.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 166.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 161.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 160.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,338.4 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1080 | B · GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | no data | TU104-410-A1 | no data for A |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,607 MHz | 1,605 MHz | A: 2 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,733 MHz | 1,770 MHz | B: 37 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | no data | 448 GB/s | no data for A |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 180 W (TDP) | 215 W (TDP) | B: 35 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
Ano data
BTU104-410-A1
no data for AArchitecture
APascal
BTuring
differsShader units
A2,560 (CUDA cores)
B2,560 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,607 MHz
B1,605 MHz
A: 2 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,733 MHz
B1,770 MHz
B: 37 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR5X
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
Ano data
B448 GB/s
no data for AExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A180 W (TDP)
B215 W (TDP)
B: 35 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080: 8 GB GDDR5X, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.