GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1080: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +86.8%NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 leads in this scenario (up to 86.8% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce GTX 1080 is better7
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 62.6% lower81 s vs 131 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 86.8% lower253 s vs 473 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 73% lower461 s vs 798 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 62.2% faster585 samples/min vs 361 samples/min
Shader units 1,280 more2,560 (CUDA cores) vs 1,280 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 2 GB more8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory bus 64 bit more256 bit vs 192 bit
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 62.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB130.9 sGeForce GTX 108080.5 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 81A · 1310100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 is ahead by 62.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
130.9 s · community measurement, sample 38 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 38 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 130.03–131.67; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
80.5 s · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 79.51–81.58; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 86.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB473.5 sGeForce GTX 1080253.5 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 253A · 4730200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 is ahead by 86.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
473.5 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 464.73–494.3; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
253.5 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 247.41–262.04; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 73%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB797.5 sGeForce GTX 1080460.9 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 461A · 7980200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 is ahead by 73% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
797.5 s · community measurement, sample 21 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 21 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 781.84–807.01; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-23; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
460.9 s · community measurement, sample 39 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 450.31–469.8; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 62.2%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB360.7 samples/minGeForce GTX 1080584.9 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 361B · 58505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 is ahead by 62.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
360.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 57 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 57 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 351.09–366.92; submissions 2025-07-29 to 2026-06-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
584.9 samples/min · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 570.45–627.62; submissions 2025-07-29 to 2026-08-29; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (11)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 366.4 | 577.6 | B +57.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 392.8 | 614.9 | B +56.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 383.3 | 609.8 | B +59.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 392.5 | 613.3 | B +56.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 388.2 | 619.2 | B +59.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 391.2 | 624.9 | B +59.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 390.9 | 621.3 | B +59% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 370.1 | 577.8 | B +56.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 368.4 | 581.4 | B +57.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 359.7 | 567.9 | B +57.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 360.5 | 574.2 | B +59.3% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (95)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 150.8 | 88.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 156.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 154.3 | 90.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 158.8 | 86 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 163.9 | 88.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 519.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 528 | 272.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 583.9 | 310.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 613.1 | 322.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 305.7 | 177.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 304.2 | 186.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 318.3 | 169.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 321.2 | 171.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 530.6 | 301.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 529.8 | 316.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 479.8 | 247.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 368 | 194.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 866.6 | 491.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 895.1 | 484.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,599.7 | 759.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,242.1 | 797.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 1,279.1 | 688.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 382.7 | 635.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 454 | 638 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 456.1 | 640.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 429.8 | 602.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 471.9 | 632.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 283.7 | 486.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 316.2 | 506.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 445.9 | 643 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 388.5 | 601.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 294.6 | 482.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 308.2 | 474 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | — | 784.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | — | 787.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 89.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 88.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 90.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 99 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 92.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 87.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 87.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 279.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 282.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 280.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 285.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 290.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 280.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 304.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 324.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 176.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 178 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 182.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 183.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 189 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 179.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 164.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 161.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 343.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 343.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 341.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 328.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 308.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 302.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 189.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 188.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 485.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 478.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 483.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 491.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 525.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 490.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 470.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 465 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 472.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 793.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 749 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 753.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 707.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 703.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 688.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 620.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 617 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 697.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 668 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 609.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 608.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 613.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 650.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 588.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 603.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 582.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 564.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 512.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 611 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | B · GeForce GTX 1080 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 1,280 (CUDA cores) | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,280 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,506 MHz | 1,607 MHz | B: 101 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,708 MHz | 1,733 MHz | B: 25 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB | B: 2 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X | differs |
| Memory bus | 192 bit | 256 bit | B: 64 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 192 GB/s | no data | no data for B |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 120 W (board power) | 180 W (TDP) | not directly comparable |
| Recommended PSU | 400 W | no data | no data for B |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | differs |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | 250 mm | no data | no data for B |
| Thickness (slots) | 2 | no data | no data for B |
| Power connectors (reference) | 1x 6-pin | no data | no data for B |
Chip
Architecture
APascal
BPascal
equalShader units
A1,280 (CUDA cores)
B2,560 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,280 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,506 MHz
B1,607 MHz
B: 101 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,708 MHz
B1,733 MHz
B: 25 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A6 GB
B8 GB
B: 2 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR5
BGDDR5X
differsMemory bus
A192 bit
B256 bit
B: 64 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A192 GB/s
Bno data
no data for BExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A120 W (board power)
B180 W (TDP)
not directly comparableTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A400 W
Bno data
no data for BInterface
APCIe 3.0
BPCIe 3.0 x16
differsLength (reference / Founders Edition)
A250 mm
Bno data
no data for BPartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A2
Bno data
no data for BPower connectors (reference)
A1x 6-pin
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB: 6 GB GDDR5, 192-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080: 8 GB GDDR5X, 256-bit bus.
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB: PCIe 3.0. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080: PCIe 3.0 x16.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBchecked November 7, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.