NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 8 GB GDDR6
- 250 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 41 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 15% of the leader
- Launch price
- $699
- MSRP, US
- Release
- July 23, 2019
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
518.69 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 522.61 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX)
917.2 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 885.71 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
46.07 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 12GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45
- 13GeForce RTX 208046
- 14GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER46
- 15GeForce GTX 1080 Ti56
- 16GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER57
Median of 33 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 53.18 s | 11 of 19 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 51.66 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 55.57 s | 7 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 50.67 s | 3 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 50.56 s | 3 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 50.72 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 49.88 s | 4 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
28.77 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 10GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU23
- 11GeForce RTX 306024
- 12GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER29
- 13GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER29
- 14GeForce RTX 208030
Median of 22 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 26.11 s | 10 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 25.51 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 25.11 s | 6 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 25.17 s | 2 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 25.44 s | 2 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 28.12 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 25.43 s | 2 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
149.25 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 8GeForce RTX 3060 Ti137
- 9GeForce RTX 2080 Ti137
- 10GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER149
- 11GeForce RTX 2080154
- 12GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER156
Median of 22 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 166.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 165.65 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 163.3 s | 6 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 159.07 s | 2 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 158.62 s | 2 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 160.79 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 163.19 s | 2 of 11 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
90.16 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 4GeForce RTX 3060 Ti62
- 5GeForce RTX 2080 Ti82
- 6GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER90
- 7GeForce RTX 208095
- 8GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER101
Median of 81 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 95.26 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 93.99 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 91.06 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 90.08 s | 2 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 90.81 s | 2 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 96.18 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 91.21 s | 2 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
99.8 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 6GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER99
- 7GeForce RTX 2080100
- 8GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER100
- 9GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER124
- 10GeForce RTX 2070126
Median of 121 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 90.95 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 96.86 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 89.93 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 92.8 s | 2 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 90.77 s | 2 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 87.03 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 87.97 s | 2 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
39.65 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 4GeForce RTX 2080 Ti30
- 5GeForce RTX 3060 Ti36
- 6GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER40
- 7GeForce RTX 208042
- 8GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45
Median of 61 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (6)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 44.71 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 44.67 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 38.78 s | 2 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 39.61 s | 2 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 40.39 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 38.46 s | 2 of 3 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA)
163.27 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 4GeForce RTX 3060 Ti105
- 5GeForce RTX 2080 Ti116
- 6GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER163
- 7GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER165
- 8GeForce RTX 2080165
Median of 112 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 147.29 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 155.34 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 150.62 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 156.7 s | 2 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 149.48 s | 2 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 149.77 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 150.59 s | 2 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.92
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
139.46 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 20 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (6)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 86 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 80.52 s | 6 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 66.97 s | 2 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 67.67 s | 2 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 71.38 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 68.35 s | 2 of 3 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
301.94 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 4GeForce RTX 3060 Ti204
- 5GeForce RTX 2080 Ti242
- 6GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER302
- 7GeForce RTX 2080305
- 8GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER306
Median of 117 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 253.45 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 279.05 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 277.88 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 283.54 s | 2 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 284.6 s | 2 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 282.79 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 283.94 s | 2 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
118.66 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 4GeForce RTX 3060 Ti84
- 5GeForce RTX 2080 Ti98
- 6GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER119
- 7GeForce RTX 2080125
- 8GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER129
Median of 70 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 127.44 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 122.62 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 120.94 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 120.48 s | 2 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 123.3 s | 2 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 129.09 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 119.29 s | 2 of 3 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA)
371.71 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 4GeForce RTX 2080 Ti278
- 5GeForce RTX 3060 Ti283
- 6GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER372
- 7GeForce RTX 2080374
- 8GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER377
Median of 111 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 385.31 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 432.04 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 356.77 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 376.66 s | 3 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 371.96 s | 2 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 378.42 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 380.57 s | 3 of 9 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
132.83 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 4GeForce RTX 3060 Ti102
- 5GeForce RTX 2080 Ti117
- 6GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER133
- 7GeForce RTX 2080142
- 8GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER153
Median of 81 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 159.69 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 165 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 134.07 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 140.8 s | 2 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 141.46 s | 2 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 409.56 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 194.83 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
1,668 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 1,769 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 1,646 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 1,632 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 1,755 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
2,293 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 40 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (16)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 2,203 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 2,172 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 2,168 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 2,571 samples/min | 38 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 2,253 samples/min | 31 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 2,235 samples/min | 29 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 2,328 samples/min | 26 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 2,282 samples/min | 29 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 2,635 samples/min | 28 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 2,645 samples/min | 24 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 2,462 samples/min | 22 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 2,485 samples/min | 17 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 2,431 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 2,425 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 2,432 samples/min | 14 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 2,538 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- TU104-450-A1
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 3,072 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,650 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,815 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 8 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR6
- Memory bus
- 256 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 495.9 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 250 W (TDP)
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. The card’s PCIe version is unknown.