GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +41.8%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 41.8% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is better1
Launch price $300 lower$699 vs $999
Where GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is better17
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 35.8% lower34 s vs 46 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 30.2% lower22 s vs 29 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 8.6% lower137 s vs 149 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 9.8% lower82 s vs 90 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 36.9% lower73 s vs 100 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 31.3% lower30 s vs 40 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 40.2% lower116 s vs 163 s
Blender Benchmark 2.92 41.8% lower98 s vs 139 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 24.6% lower242 s vs 302 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 21.1% lower98 s vs 119 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 33.7% lower278 s vs 372 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 13.9% lower117 s vs 133 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 24.1% faster2,845 samples/min vs 2,293 samples/min
Shader units 1,280 more4,352 (CUDA cores) vs 3,072 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 3 GB more11 GB vs 8 GB
Memory bus 96 bit more352 bit vs 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 120.1 GB/s more616 GB/s vs 495.9 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 35.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER46.1 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti33.9 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 34A · 460100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 35.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
46.1 s · community measurement, sample 33 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 33 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 45.46–47.66; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
33.9 s · community measurement, sample 53 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 53 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 33.42–34.68; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 30.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER28.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti22.1 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 22A · 29050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 30.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
28.8 s · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 27.21–29.41; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
22.1 s · community measurement, sample 39 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 20.82–22.62; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 8.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER149.3 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti137.4 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 137A · 1490200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 8.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
149.3 s · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 148.22–154.89; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-21; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
137.4 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 133.31–141.35; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 9.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER90.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti82.1 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 82A · 900100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 9.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
90.2 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 89.4–91.43; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
82.1 s · community measurement, sample 131 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 131 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.74–85.51; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 36.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER99.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti72.9 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 73A · 1000200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 36.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
99.8 s · community measurement, sample 121 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 121 submissions (25 outliers excluded), interquartile range 97.95–101.06; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
72.9 s · community measurement, sample 195 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 195 submissions (29 outliers excluded), interquartile range 71.62–74.75; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-03-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 31.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER39.7 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti30.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 30A · 400100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 31.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
39.7 s · community measurement, sample 61 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 61 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 39.27–40.2; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
30.2 s · community measurement, sample 114 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 114 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 29.68–31.01; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 40.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER163.3 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti116.5 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 116A · 1630200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 40.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
163.3 s · community measurement, sample 112 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 112 submissions (21 outliers excluded), interquartile range 161.87–166.92; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
116.5 s · community measurement, sample 184 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 184 submissions (35 outliers excluded), interquartile range 114.81–119.1; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-03-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 41.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.92
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER139.5 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti98.4 sPosition among tested models (10, OptiX)
B · 98A · 1390100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 41.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
139.5 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 89.37–144.85; submissions 2021-03-15 to 2021-09-16; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
98.4 s · community measurement, sample 33 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 33 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.63–106.46; submissions 2021-03-11 to 2021-11-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 24.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER301.9 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti242.3 sPosition among tested models (23, CUDA)
B · 242A · 30205001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 24.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
301.9 s · community measurement, sample 117 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 117 submissions (17 outliers excluded), interquartile range 298.38–309.39; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
242.3 s · community measurement, sample 208 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 208 submissions (14 outliers excluded), interquartile range 236.76–251.44; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-11-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 21.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER118.7 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti98 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 98A · 1190200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 21.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
118.7 s · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 117.98–120.42; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
98 s · community measurement, sample 132 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 132 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 96.31–101.31; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 33.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER371.7 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti277.9 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 278A · 37205001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 33.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
371.7 s · community measurement, sample 111 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 111 submissions (18 outliers excluded), interquartile range 366.17–380.44; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
277.9 s · community measurement, sample 195 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 195 submissions (19 outliers excluded), interquartile range 270.18–286.3; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-03-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 13.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER132.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti116.6 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 117A · 1330200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 13.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
132.8 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (16 outliers excluded), interquartile range 132.15–134.59; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
116.6 s · community measurement, sample 111 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 111 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 113.38–120.82; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 24.1%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER2,292.6 samples/minGeForce RTX 2080 Ti2,845.2 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,293B · 2,84505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 24.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
2,292.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2221.12–2330.97; submissions 2025-07-24 to 2026-09-26; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2,845.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 131 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 131 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2732.17–2950.36; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-23; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (51)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.9 | 37.4 | B +33.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 50.6 | 37.7 | B +34.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 50.7 | 38.2 | B +32.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 55.6 | 40.1 | B +38.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 53.2 | 39.1 | B +35.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.4 | 20.4 | B +24.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.4 | 20.3 | B +25.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.2 | 19.3 | B +30.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.1 | 19 | B +32.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.1 | 19.8 | B +32.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 163.2 | 153.6 | B +6.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 158.6 | 147.3 | B +7.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 159.1 | 151.1 | B +5.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 163.3 | 151.7 | B +7.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 91.2 | 82.6 | B +10.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 90.8 | 81.4 | B +11.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 90.1 | 82.5 | B +9.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 88 | 67.1 | B +31.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 90.8 | 68.4 | B +32.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 92.8 | 71 | B +30.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 38.5 | 31.2 | B +23.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 39.6 | 31.9 | B +24.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 38.8 | 31.4 | B +23.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 150.6 | 114.5 | B +31.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 149.5 | 113.4 | B +31.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 156.7 | 120.2 | B +30.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 68.3 | 55.4 | B +23.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 67.7 | 53.5 | B +26.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 67 | 53.1 | B +26.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 80.5 | 59.4 | B +35.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 283.9 | 236.4 | B +20.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 284.6 | 234.3 | B +21.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 283.5 | 236 | B +20.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 119.3 | 101.3 | B +17.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 123.3 | 101.6 | B +21.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 120.5 | 99.5 | B +21% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 380.6 | 290 | B +31.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 372 | 282.3 | B +31.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 376.7 | 290.2 | B +29.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 141.5 | 129.3 | B +9.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 140.8 | 128.9 | B +9.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,234.5 | 2,799.5 | B +25.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,431.9 | 3,084.5 | B +26.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,485.1 | 3,223 | B +29.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,462.5 | 3,218.9 | B +30.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,644.5 | 3,362.6 | B +27.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,634.8 | 3,343.5 | B +26.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,282.1 | 2,872.1 | B +25.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,327.6 | 2,903.2 | B +24.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,253.2 | 2,818.4 | B +25.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,571.2 | 2,792.6 | B +8.6% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (64)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 518.7 | 521.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 522.6 | 514 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 917.2 | 860.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 885.7 | 866.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 50.7 | 37.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 51.7 | 38.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 28.1 | 19.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.5 | 19.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 160.8 | 153.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 165.6 | 154.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 166.3 | 159.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 96.2 | 81.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 91.1 | 84.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 94 | 84.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 95.3 | 86.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 87 | 66.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 89.9 | 67.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 96.9 | 70.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 90.9 | 64.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 40.4 | 30.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 44.7 | 33.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 44.7 | 33.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 149.8 | 112.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 150.6 | 108.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 155.3 | 111.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 147.3 | 102.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 71.4 | 56.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 86 | 63.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 282.8 | 234.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 277.9 | 223.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 279 | 225.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 253.5 | 208.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 129.1 | 99.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 120.9 | 99.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 122.6 | 100.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 127.4 | 105.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 378.4 | 288.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 356.8 | 270.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 432 | 330 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 385.3 | 282 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 409.6 | 131.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 194.8 | 132.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 134.1 | 118.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 165 | 137.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 159.7 | 137.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,755.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,631.8 | 2,112.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,646.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,769.3 | 2,233.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,667.7 | 2,339.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,171.8 | 2,835.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,202.7 | 2,754.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,537.9 | 3,373.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,425.3 | 3,108.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,430.7 | 3,235.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,168.2 | 2,749.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 30.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 59.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,461.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,495.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,225.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,330 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 3,011.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,627.7 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | B · GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU104-450-A1 | TU102-300A-K1-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 3,072 (CUDA cores) | 4,352 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,280 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,650 MHz | 1,350 MHz | A: 300 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,815 MHz | 1,545 MHz | A: 270 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 11 GB | B: 3 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 352 bit | B: 96 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 495.9 GB/s | 616 GB/s | B: 120.1 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 250 W (TDP) | 250 W (TDP) | equal |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU104-450-A1
BTU102-300A-K1-A1
differsArchitecture
ATuring
BTuring
equalShader units
A3,072 (CUDA cores)
B4,352 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,280 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,650 MHz
B1,350 MHz
A: 300 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,815 MHz
B1,545 MHz
A: 270 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B11 GB
B: 3 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A256 bit
B352 bit
B: 96 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A495.9 GB/s
B616 GB/s
B: 120.1 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A250 W (TDP)
B250 W (TDP)
equalTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: 11 GB GDDR6, 352-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.