NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 11 GB GDDR6
- 250 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 37 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 19% of the leader
- Launch price
- $999
- MSRP, US
- Release
- September 20, 2018
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
521.23 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 1GeForce RTX 2080 Ti521
- 2GeForce GTX 1080 Ti530
- 3GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER574
- 4GeForce GTX 1070989
Median of 30 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 513.96 s | 1 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.81a
GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX)
866.31 s
lower is better
Median of 27 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 860.12 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
33.91 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 53 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 39.13 s | 7 of 19 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 38.79 s | 4 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 40.14 s | 5 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 38.24 s | 1 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 37.7 s | 1 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 37.52 s | 1 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 37.36 s | 1 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
22.09 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 39 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 19.76 s | 8 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 19.29 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 19 s | 5 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 19.3 s | 1 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 20.31 s | 1 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 19.54 s | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 20.37 s | 1 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
137.37 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 45 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 159.17 s | 9 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 154.67 s | 4 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 151.68 s | 5 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 151.12 s | 1 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 147.3 s | 1 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 153.51 s | 1 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 153.62 s | 1 of 11 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
86.24 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 31 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 84.21 s | 6 of 10 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 84.53 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 82.15 s | 5 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 82.48 s | 1 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 81.4 s | 1 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 81.13 s | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 82.61 s | 1 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
64.63 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 37 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 70.93 s | 6 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 67.59 s | 4 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 72.91 s | 5 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 71.04 s | 1 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 68.42 s | 1 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 66.39 s | 1 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 67.07 s | 1 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
33.47 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 29 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 33.14 s | 3 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 30.47 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 30.21 s | 4 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 31.38 s | 1 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 31.89 s | 1 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 30.42 s | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 31.24 s | 1 of 3 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA)
102.49 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 36 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 111.1 s | 5 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 108.62 s | 4 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 116.48 s | 5 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 120.22 s | 1 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 113.45 s | 1 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 112.86 s | 1 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 114.54 s | 1 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
63.46 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 24 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 98.35 s | 3 of 10 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 59.23 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 59.41 s | 3 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 53.11 s | 1 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 53.5 s | 1 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 56.07 s | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 55.4 s | 1 of 3 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
208.09 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 40 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 225.15 s | 6 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 223.29 s | 4 of 4 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 242.27 s | 5 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 236.01 s | 1 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 234.29 s | 1 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 234.86 s | 1 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 236.43 s | 1 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
105.06 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 38 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 100.25 s | 6 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 99.49 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 97.96 s | 5 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 99.53 s | 1 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 101.61 s | 1 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 99.52 s | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 101.26 s | 1 of 3 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
282.04 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 34 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 330.02 s | 6 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 270.18 s | 4 of 4 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 277.94 s | 4 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 290.2 s | 1 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 282.27 s | 1 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 288.34 s | 1 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 290.05 s | 1 of 9 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
137.91 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 28 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 137.06 s | 6 of 8 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 118.12 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 116.63 s | 5 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 128.92 s | 1 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 129.34 s | 1 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 131.15 s | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 132.52 s | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
2,330 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 10 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (6)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 2,226 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 2,495 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 2,461 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 2,340 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 2,233 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 2,112 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
2,845 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 131 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (18)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 2,754 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 2,836 samples/min | 29 of 46 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 2,749 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 2,628 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 2,793 samples/min | 33 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 2,818 samples/min | 26 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 2,799 samples/min | 25 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 2,903 samples/min | 24 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 2,872 samples/min | 24 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 3,344 samples/min | 22 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 3,363 samples/min | 19 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 3,219 samples/min | 19 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 3,223 samples/min | 15 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 3,236 samples/min | 10 of 30 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 3,108 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2 | 3,011 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 3,085 samples/min | 10 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 3,373 samples/min | 6 of 9 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- TU102-300A-K1-A1
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 4,352 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,350 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,545 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 11 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR6
- Memory bus
- 352 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 616 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 250 W (TDP)
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. The card’s PCIe version is unknown.