GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +75.5%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 75.5% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is better2
Board power 35 W lower215 W (TDP) vs 250 W (TDP)
Launch price $500 lower$499 vs $999
Where GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is better18
Blender Benchmark 2.81 10.1% lower521 s vs 574 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 33.2% lower34 s vs 45 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 31.9% lower22 s vs 29 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 13.4% lower137 s vs 156 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 21.2% lower86 s vs 105 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 39.9% lower65 s vs 90 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 51.9% lower33 s vs 51 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 44.1% lower102 s vs 148 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 64.1% lower63 s vs 104 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 23.3% lower208 s vs 257 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 29% lower105 s vs 135 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 36.4% lower282 s vs 385 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 33.3% lower138 s vs 184 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 27.3% faster2,845 samples/min vs 2,235 samples/min
Shader units 1,792 more4,352 (CUDA cores) vs 2,560 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 3 GB more11 GB vs 8 GB
Memory bus 96 bit more352 bit vs 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 168 GB/s more616 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 10.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER574.1 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti521.2 sPosition among tested models (4, CUDA)
B · 521A · 57402505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 10.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
574.1 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 559.43–586.73; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
521.2 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 507.17–543.11; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 33.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti33.9 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 34A · 450100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 33.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.2 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.61–45.89; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
33.9 s · community measurement, sample 53 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 53 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 33.42–34.68; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 31.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER29.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti22.1 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 22A · 29050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 31.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
29.2 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.79–29.82; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
22.1 s · community measurement, sample 39 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 20.82–22.62; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 13.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER155.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti137.4 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 137A · 1560200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 13.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
155.8 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 153.23–158.95; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
137.4 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 133.31–141.35; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 21.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER104.5 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti86.2 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 86A · 105050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 21.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
104.5 s · community measurement, sample 38 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 38 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 102.59–107.68; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
86.2 s · community measurement, sample 31 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 31 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 83.91–91.02; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 39.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER90.4 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti64.6 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 65A · 900100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 39.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
90.4 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.69–91.7; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
64.6 s · community measurement, sample 37 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 37 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.21–66.02; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 51.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER50.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti33.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 33A · 51020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 51.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
50.8 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 49.98–51.74; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
33.5 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.62–35.12; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 44.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER147.7 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti102.5 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 102A · 1480200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 44.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
147.7 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.41–149.78; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
102.5 s · community measurement, sample 36 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 36 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 100.68–104.8; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 64.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER104.1 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti63.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 63A · 104050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 64.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
104.1 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 103.53–106.27; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-20; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
63.5 s · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 62.26–67.16; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 23.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER256.6 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti208.1 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 208A · 2570200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 23.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
256.6 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 254.13–262.18; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
208.1 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 200.44–213.46; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 29%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER135.5 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti105.1 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 105A · 1350100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 29% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
135.5 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 134.34–137.84; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
105.1 s · community measurement, sample 38 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 38 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 102.5–110.4; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 36.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER384.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti282 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 282A · 38502505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 36.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
384.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 379–393.16; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
282 s · community measurement, sample 34 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 34 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 274.18–287.61; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 33.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER183.9 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti137.9 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 138A · 1840100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 33.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
183.9 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 180.06–189.97; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
137.9 s · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 28 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 132.73–144.53; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 27.3%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER2,234.5 samples/minGeForce RTX 2080 Ti2,845.2 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,235B · 2,84505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 27.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2,234.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2150.53–2296.29; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-11-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2,845.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 131 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 131 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2732.17–2950.36; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-23; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (79)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 559.4 | 514 | B +8.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.3 | 37.5 | B +31.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.1 | 37.4 | B +31.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.9 | 37.7 | B +32.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 50.5 | 38.2 | B +32% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 54.4 | 40.1 | B +35.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 52.2 | 39.1 | B +33.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 27.1 | 20.4 | B +33% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.7 | 20.3 | B +31.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.8 | 19.3 | B +33.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.8 | 19 | B +35.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.5 | 19.8 | B +34.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 168.4 | 153.5 | B +9.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 169.4 | 153.6 | B +10.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 165.2 | 147.3 | B +12.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 168 | 151.1 | B +11.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 171.7 | 151.7 | B +13.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 177.3 | 159.2 | B +11.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 101.2 | 82.6 | B +22.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100.4 | 81.4 | B +23.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100 | 82.5 | B +21.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 101 | 82.1 | B +22.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 103 | 84.2 | B +22.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 88 | 66.4 | B +32.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 88.1 | 67.1 | B +31.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 90.9 | 68.4 | B +32.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 93.7 | 71 | B +32% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 99 | 72.9 | B +35.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 96.4 | 70.9 | B +35.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 43.7 | 31.2 | B +39.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 44.6 | 31.9 | B +39.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 43.7 | 31.4 | B +39.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 45.5 | 30.2 | B +50.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 51.5 | 33.1 | B +55.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 153.5 | 112.9 | B +36% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 154 | 114.5 | B +34.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 153.3 | 113.4 | B +35.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 161.1 | 120.2 | B +34% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 165.1 | 116.5 | B +41.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 157.8 | 111.1 | B +42% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 83.3 | 55.4 | B +50.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 80.7 | 53.5 | B +50.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 79.6 | 53.1 | B +49.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 98.8 | 59.4 | B +66.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 172.6 | 98.4 | B +75.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 287.5 | 234.9 | B +22.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 288.2 | 236.4 | B +21.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 290.1 | 234.3 | B +23.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 290.6 | 236 | B +23.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 305.5 | 242.3 | B +26.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 285.3 | 225.1 | B +26.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 132.8 | 101.3 | B +31.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 131.7 | 101.6 | B +29.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 128.7 | 99.5 | B +29.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 128.8 | 98 | B +31.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 130.6 | 100.2 | B +30.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 382.7 | 288.3 | B +32.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 383.5 | 290 | B +32.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 377.2 | 282.3 | B +33.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 383.5 | 290.2 | B +32.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 376.9 | 277.9 | B +35.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 434.6 | 330 | B +31.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 166.4 | 132.5 | B +25.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 161.2 | 129.3 | B +24.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 160.2 | 128.9 | B +24.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 153.3 | 116.6 | B +31.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 192 | 137.1 | B +40.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,189.4 | 2,799.5 | B +27.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,143.1 | 2,835.9 | B +32.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,427.4 | 3,084.5 | B +27.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,447.3 | 3,235.5 | B +32.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,467.7 | 3,223 | B +30.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,394.9 | 3,218.9 | B +34.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,619 | 3,362.6 | B +28.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,604.6 | 3,343.5 | B +28.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,374.9 | 2,872.1 | B +20.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,262.8 | 2,903.2 | B +28.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,228.4 | 2,818.4 | B +26.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,225.8 | 2,792.6 | B +25.5% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (36)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 970.4 | 860.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 979.6 | 866.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 51.6 | 38.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.7 | 19.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.2 | 19.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 172.6 | 154.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 101.3 | 81.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100.2 | 84.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 91.3 | 67.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 43.3 | 30.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 45.5 | 30.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 154.6 | 108.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 82 | 56.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 98.4 | 59.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 283.7 | 223.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 130.3 | 99.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 129.8 | 99.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 360.5 | 270.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 167.1 | 131.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 152 | 118.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,556.4 | 2,112.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,531.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,580.6 | 2,233.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,546.7 | 2,339.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,562.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,569.9 | 2,225.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,460.8 | 2,330 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,079.7 | 2,754.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,522.5 | 3,373.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,413.7 | 3,108.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,072.4 | 2,627.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,123.5 | 2,749.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,338.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,461.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,495.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 3,011.2 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | B · GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU104-410-A1 | TU102-300A-K1-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | 4,352 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,792 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,605 MHz | 1,350 MHz | A: 255 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,770 MHz | 1,545 MHz | A: 225 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 11 GB | B: 3 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 352 bit | B: 96 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 448 GB/s | 616 GB/s | B: 168 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 215 W (TDP) | 250 W (TDP) | B: 35 W higher |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU104-410-A1
BTU102-300A-K1-A1
differsArchitecture
ATuring
BTuring
equalShader units
A2,560 (CUDA cores)
B4,352 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,792 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,605 MHz
B1,350 MHz
A: 255 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,770 MHz
B1,545 MHz
A: 225 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B11 GB
B: 3 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A256 bit
B352 bit
B: 96 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A448 GB/s
B616 GB/s
B: 168 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A215 W (TDP)
B250 W (TDP)
B: 35 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: 11 GB GDDR6, 352-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.