GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +581.2%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 581.2% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1070 is better2
Board power 100 W lower150 W (TDP) vs 250 W (TDP)
Launch price $620 lower$379 vs $999
Where GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is better17
Blender Benchmark 2.81 89.7% lower521 s vs 989 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 166% lower34 s vs 90 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 390% lower22 s vs 108 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 131.4% lower137 s vs 318 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 382.8% lower82 s vs 397 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 227.2% lower65 s vs 211 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 581.2% lower30 s vs 206 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 260% lower102 s vs 369 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 303.5% lower59 s vs 240 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 164.6% lower208 s vs 551 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 491% lower98 s vs 579 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 201.5% lower282 s vs 850 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 567.6% lower117 s vs 779 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 443.4% faster2,845 samples/min vs 524 samples/min
Video memory 3 GB more11 GB vs 8 GB
Memory bus 96 bit more352 bit vs 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 359.7 GB/s more616 GB/s vs 256.3 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 89.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070988.7 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti521.2 sPosition among tested models (4, CUDA)
B · 521A · 98902505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 89.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
988.7 s · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 974.27–1022.69; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
521.2 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 507.17–543.11; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 166%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 107090.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti33.9 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 34A · 900100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 166% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
90.2 s · community measurement, sample 83 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 83 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.16–91.66; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
33.9 s · community measurement, sample 53 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 53 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 33.42–34.68; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 390%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070108.3 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti22.1 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 22A · 108050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 390% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
108.3 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 106.84–111.79; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
22.1 s · community measurement, sample 39 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 20.82–22.62; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 131.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070317.9 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti137.4 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 137A · 3180200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 131.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
317.9 s · community measurement, sample 54 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 54 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 310.1–327.85; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
137.4 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 133.31–141.35; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 382.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070396.6 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti82.1 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 82A · 3970100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 382.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
396.6 s · community measurement, sample 35 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 35 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 369.82–412.67; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-23; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
82.1 s · community measurement, sample 131 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 131 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.74–85.51; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 227.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070211.5 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti64.6 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 65A · 2110100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 227.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
211.5 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 208.23–215.49; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
64.6 s · community measurement, sample 37 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 37 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.21–66.02; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 581.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070205.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti30.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 30A · 2060100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 581.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
205.8 s · community measurement, sample 31 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 31 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 201.77–213.27; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-19; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
30.2 s · community measurement, sample 114 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 114 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 29.68–31.01; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 260%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070369 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti102.5 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 102A · 3690200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 260% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
369 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 361.19–376.13; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
102.5 s · community measurement, sample 36 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 36 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 100.68–104.8; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 303.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070239.7 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti59.4 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 59A · 2400100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 303.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
239.7 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 235.11–247.34; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-19; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
59.4 s · community measurement, sample 116 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 116 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 58.18–61.69; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 164.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070550.6 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti208.1 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 208A · 5510200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 164.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
550.6 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 539.97–570.38; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
208.1 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 200.44–213.46; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 491%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070579 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti98 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 98A · 5790200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 491% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
579 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 568.76–593.75; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-19; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
98 s · community measurement, sample 132 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 132 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 96.31–101.31; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 201.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070850.4 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti282 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 282A · 85002505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 201.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
850.4 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 837.37–862.42; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
282 s · community measurement, sample 34 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 34 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 274.18–287.61; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 567.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070778.6 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti116.6 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 117A · 7790200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 567.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
778.6 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 745.56–791.82; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-19; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
116.6 s · community measurement, sample 111 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 111 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 113.38–120.82; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 443.4%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1070523.6 samples/minGeForce RTX 2080 Ti2,845.2 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 524B · 2,84505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 443.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
523.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 72 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 72 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 509.18–537.94; submissions 2025-07-25 to 2026-03-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2,845.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 131 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 131 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2732.17–2950.36; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-23; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (50)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,012.7 | 514 | B +97% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 103.4 | 37.5 | B +175.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 104.1 | 37.4 | B +178.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 102.9 | 37.7 | B +173% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 105.6 | 38.2 | B +176.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 112.1 | 40.1 | B +179.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 105.4 | 38.8 | B +171.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 104.2 | 39.1 | B +166.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 108.5 | 19 | B +470.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 351.4 | 153.5 | B +128.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 361.2 | 153.6 | B +135.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 353.4 | 147.3 | B +139.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 363.8 | 151.1 | B +140.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 365.3 | 151.7 | B +140.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 351.7 | 159.2 | B +121% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 205.9 | 66.4 | B +210.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 208.3 | 67.1 | B +210.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 211.7 | 68.4 | B +209.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 213 | 71 | B +199.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 217.2 | 72.9 | B +197.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 208.4 | 70.9 | B +193.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 401.4 | 112.9 | B +255.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 408.8 | 114.5 | B +256.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 401 | 113.4 | B +253.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 393.7 | 120.2 | B +227.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 359.7 | 116.5 | B +208.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 362.2 | 111.1 | B +226% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 575.7 | 234.9 | B +145.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 580.5 | 236.4 | B +145.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 575.1 | 234.3 | B +145.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 588.2 | 236 | B +149.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 604.4 | 242.3 | B +149.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 582.9 | 225.1 | B +158.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 836.2 | 288.3 | B +190% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 906.2 | 290 | B +212.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 878.9 | 282.3 | B +211.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 807.6 | 290.2 | B +178.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 800.4 | 277.9 | B +188% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 867.1 | 330 | B +162.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 534.5 | 2,799.5 | B +423.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 567.2 | 3,084.5 | B +443.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 572.3 | 3,235.5 | B +465.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 567.4 | 3,223 | B +468% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 567.6 | 3,218.9 | B +467.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 573.3 | 3,362.6 | B +486.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 574 | 3,343.5 | B +482.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 540.2 | 2,872.1 | B +431.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 548 | 2,903.2 | B +429.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 522.5 | 2,818.4 | B +439.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 527.1 | 2,792.6 | B +429.9% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (74)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 162.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 107.8 | 19.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 109.1 | 19.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 329.9 | 154.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 630.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 389.5 | 84.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 386.7 | 84.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 412.9 | 86.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 204 | 67.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 322.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 200.3 | 30.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 204.8 | 33.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 213.2 | 33.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 345.7 | 108.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 377.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 228.9 | 59.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 316.7 | 98.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 247.4 | 63.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 558.8 | 223.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 873.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 560.3 | 99.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 558.4 | 100.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 592.5 | 105.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 763.4 | 270.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 1,202.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 752.1 | 118.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 818.9 | 137.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 848.4 | 137.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 705.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 639.5 | 2,112.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 642.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 653.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 619.2 | 2,233.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 647.6 | 2,339.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 631.4 | 2,461.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 653 | 2,495.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 610.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 662.3 | 2,225.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 606.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 628.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 449.5 | 2,835.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 474.2 | 2,754.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 624.6 | 3,373.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 567.1 | 3,108.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 461.2 | 2,749.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 860.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 866.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 19.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 20.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 20.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 19.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 81.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 82.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 81.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 82.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 30.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 31.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 31.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 31.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 56.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 55.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 53.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 53.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 99.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 101.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 101.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 99.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 131.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 132.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 129.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 128.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,330 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 3,011.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,627.7 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1070 | B · GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GP104-200-A1 | TU102-300A-K1-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 1,920 (CUDA cores) | 4,352 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,506 MHz | 1,350 MHz | A: 156 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,683 MHz | 1,545 MHz | A: 138 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 11 GB | B: 3 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 352 bit | B: 96 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 256.3 GB/s | 616 GB/s | B: 359.7 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 150 W (TDP) | 250 W (TDP) | B: 100 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
AGP104-200-A1
BTU102-300A-K1-A1
differsArchitecture
APascal
BTuring
differsShader units
A1,920 (CUDA cores)
B4,352 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,506 MHz
B1,350 MHz
A: 156 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,683 MHz
B1,545 MHz
A: 138 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B11 GB
B: 3 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR5
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B352 bit
B: 96 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A256.3 GB/s
B616 GB/s
B: 359.7 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A150 W (TDP)
B250 W (TDP)
B: 100 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: 8 GB GDDR5, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: 11 GB GDDR6, 352-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.