NVIDIA · Pascal
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 8 GB GDDR5
- 150 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 60 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 3% of the leader
- Launch price
- $379
- MSRP, US
- Release
- June 10, 2016
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
988.74 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 1GeForce RTX 2080 Ti521
- 2GeForce GTX 1080 Ti530
- 3GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER574
- 4GeForce GTX 1070989
Median of 24 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,012.68 s | 5 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
90.21 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 83 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 104.22 s | 18 of 19 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 105.37 s | 9 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 112.08 s | 20 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 105.62 s | 15 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 102.91 s | 16 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 103.41 s | 7 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 104.07 s | 11 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
108.26 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 20 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 109.12 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 107.76 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 162.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 108.49 s | 16 of 17 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
317.91 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 54 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 351.74 s | 15 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 329.85 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 365.29 s | 20 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 363.82 s | 15 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 353.41 s | 14 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 351.41 s | 7 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 361.2 s | 10 of 11 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
396.61 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 35 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 412.88 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 386.65 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 389.54 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 630.3 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
211.46 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 40 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 208.39 s | 13 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 204.04 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 217.17 s | 19 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 213.01 s | 14 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 211.74 s | 13 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 205.88 s | 5 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 208.31 s | 10 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
205.79 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 31 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 213.23 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 204.79 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 200.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 322.63 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA)
369.02 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 40 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 362.17 s | 12 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 345.68 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 359.7 s | 18 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 393.68 s | 13 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 401 s | 14 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 401.41 s | 5 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 408.76 s | 10 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
239.71 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 26 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 247.39 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 316.69 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 228.93 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 377.35 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
550.61 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 46 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 582.86 s | 12 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 558.76 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 604.37 s | 19 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 588.24 s | 14 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 575.09 s | 13 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 575.66 s | 5 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 580.52 s | 10 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
578.95 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 26 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 592.54 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 558.37 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 560.28 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 873.86 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
850.36 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 40 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 867.06 s | 12 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 763.41 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 800.42 s | 18 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 807.61 s | 13 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 878.87 s | 13 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 836.21 s | 5 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 906.22 s | 9 of 9 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
778.65 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 26 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 848.4 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 818.9 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 752.09 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 1,202.08 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
640 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 22 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (11)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 629 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 607 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 662 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 610 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 653 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 631 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 648 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 619 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 654 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 642 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 705 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
524 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 72 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (16)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 474 samples/min | 45 of 48 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 450 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 461 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 527 samples/min | 54 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 523 samples/min | 47 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 535 samples/min | 45 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 548 samples/min | 43 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 540 samples/min | 45 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 574 samples/min | 46 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 573 samples/min | 39 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 568 samples/min | 39 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 567 samples/min | 34 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 572 samples/min | 28 of 30 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 567 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 567 samples/min | 32 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 625 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- GP104-200-A1
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Shader units
- 1,920 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,506 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,683 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 8 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR5
- Memory bus
- 256 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 256.3 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 150 W (TDP)
- Interface
- PCIe 3.0 x16
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. Enter the PCIe version of the motherboard slot.