GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +407.8%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in this scenario (up to 407.8% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1070 is better2
Board power 65 W lower150 W (TDP) vs 215 W (TDP)
Launch price $120 lower$379 vs $499
Where GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is better15
Blender Benchmark 2.81 72.2% lower574 s vs 989 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 99.7% lower45 s vs 90 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 271.4% lower29 s vs 108 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 104% lower156 s vs 318 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 292.8% lower101 s vs 397 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 133.9% lower90 s vs 211 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 352.7% lower45 s vs 206 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 149.8% lower148 s vs 369 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 142.6% lower99 s vs 240 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 114.6% lower257 s vs 551 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 349.6% lower129 s vs 579 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 121% lower385 s vs 850 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 407.8% lower153 s vs 779 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 326.7% faster2,235 samples/min vs 524 samples/min
Memory bandwidth 191.7 GB/s more448 GB/s vs 256.3 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 72.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070988.7 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER574.1 sPosition among tested models (4, CUDA)
B · 574A · 98902505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 72.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
988.7 s · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 974.27–1022.69; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
574.1 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 559.43–586.73; submissions 2020-01-09 to 2020-01-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 99.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 107090.2 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.2 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 45A · 900100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 99.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
90.2 s · community measurement, sample 83 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 83 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.16–91.66; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.2 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.61–45.89; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 271.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070108.3 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER29.2 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 29A · 108050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 271.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
108.3 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 106.84–111.79; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
29.2 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.79–29.82; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 104%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070317.9 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER155.8 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 156A · 3180200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 104% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
317.9 s · community measurement, sample 54 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 54 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 310.1–327.85; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
155.8 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 153.23–158.95; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 292.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070396.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER101 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 101A · 3970100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 292.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
396.6 s · community measurement, sample 35 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 35 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 369.82–412.67; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-23; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
101 s · community measurement, sample 148 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 148 submissions (17 outliers excluded), interquartile range 99.16–102.19; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 133.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070211.5 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER90.4 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 90A · 2110100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 133.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
211.5 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 208.23–215.49; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
90.4 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.69–91.7; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 352.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070205.8 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 45A · 2060100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 352.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
205.8 s · community measurement, sample 31 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 31 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 201.77–213.27; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-19; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.5 s · community measurement, sample 115 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 115 submissions (24 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.86–45.95; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 149.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070369 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER147.7 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 148A · 3690200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 149.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
369 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 361.19–376.13; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
147.7 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.41–149.78; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 142.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070239.7 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER98.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 99A · 2400100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 142.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
239.7 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 235.11–247.34; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-19; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
98.8 s · community measurement, sample 122 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 122 submissions (18 outliers excluded), interquartile range 97.1–100.18; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 114.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070550.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER256.6 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 257A · 5510200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 114.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
550.6 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 539.97–570.38; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
256.6 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 254.13–262.18; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 349.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070579 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER128.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 129A · 5790200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 349.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
579 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 568.76–593.75; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-19; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
128.8 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 126.86–131.25; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 121%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070850.4 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER384.8 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 385A · 85002505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 121% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
850.4 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 837.37–862.42; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
384.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 379–393.16; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 407.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1070778.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER153.3 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 153A · 7790200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 407.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
778.6 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 745.56–791.82; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-19; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
153.3 s · community measurement, sample 115 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 115 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 150.54–157.53; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 326.7%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1070523.6 samples/minGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER2,234.5 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 524B · 2,23505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 326.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
523.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 72 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 72 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 509.18–537.94; submissions 2025-07-25 to 2026-03-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2,234.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2150.53–2296.29; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-11-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (50)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,012.7 | 559.4 | B +81% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 103.4 | 49.3 | B +109.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 104.1 | 49.1 | B +111.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 102.9 | 49.9 | B +106.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 105.6 | 50.5 | B +109.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 112.1 | 54.4 | B +105.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 104.2 | 52.2 | B +99.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 108.5 | 25.8 | B +321% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 351.4 | 168.4 | B +108.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 361.2 | 169.4 | B +113.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 353.4 | 165.2 | B +113.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 363.8 | 168 | B +116.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 365.3 | 171.7 | B +112.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 351.7 | 177.3 | B +98.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 205.9 | 88 | B +133.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 208.3 | 88.1 | B +136.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 211.7 | 90.9 | B +132.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 213 | 93.7 | B +127.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 217.2 | 99 | B +119.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 208.4 | 96.4 | B +116.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 401.4 | 153.5 | B +161.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 408.8 | 154 | B +165.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 401 | 153.3 | B +161.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 393.7 | 161.1 | B +144.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 359.7 | 165.1 | B +117.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 362.2 | 157.8 | B +129.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 575.7 | 287.5 | B +100.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 580.5 | 288.2 | B +101.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 575.1 | 290.1 | B +98.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 588.2 | 290.6 | B +102.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 604.4 | 305.5 | B +97.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 582.9 | 285.3 | B +104.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 836.2 | 382.7 | B +118.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 906.2 | 383.5 | B +136.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 878.9 | 377.2 | B +133% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 807.6 | 383.5 | B +110.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 800.4 | 376.9 | B +112.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 867.1 | 434.6 | B +99.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 534.5 | 2,189.4 | B +309.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 474.2 | 2,079.7 | B +338.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 567.2 | 2,427.4 | B +328% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 572.3 | 2,447.3 | B +327.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 567.4 | 2,467.7 | B +334.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 567.6 | 2,394.9 | B +322% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 573.3 | 2,619 | B +356.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 574 | 2,604.6 | B +353.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 540.2 | 2,374.9 | B +339.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 548 | 2,262.8 | B +313% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 522.5 | 2,228.4 | B +326.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 527.1 | 2,225.8 | B +322.3% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (74)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 105.4 | 51.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 162.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 107.8 | 26.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 109.1 | 26.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 329.9 | 172.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 630.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 389.5 | 100.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 386.7 | 103 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 412.9 | 104.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 204 | 91.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 322.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 200.3 | 45.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 204.8 | 51.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 213.2 | 50.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 345.7 | 154.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 377.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 228.9 | 98.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 316.7 | 172.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 247.4 | 104.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 558.8 | 283.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 873.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 560.3 | 129.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 558.4 | 130.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 592.5 | 135.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 763.4 | 360.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 1,202.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 752.1 | 152 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 818.9 | 192 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 848.4 | 183.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 705.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 639.5 | 1,556.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 642.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 653.8 | 1,531.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 619.2 | 1,580.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 647.6 | 1,546.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 631.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 653 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 610.5 | 1,562.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 662.3 | 1,569.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 606.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 628.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 449.5 | 2,143.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 624.6 | 2,522.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 567.1 | 2,413.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 461.2 | 2,123.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 970.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 979.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 26.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 27.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 26.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 25.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 101.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 101.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 100.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 100 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 43.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 43.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 44.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 43.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 82 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 83.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 80.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 79.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 130.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 132.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 131.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 128.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 167.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 166.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 161.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 160.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,460.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,072.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,338.4 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1070 | B · GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GP104-200-A1 | TU104-410-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 1,920 (CUDA cores) | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,506 MHz | 1,605 MHz | B: 99 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,683 MHz | 1,770 MHz | B: 87 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 256.3 GB/s | 448 GB/s | B: 191.7 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 150 W (TDP) | 215 W (TDP) | B: 65 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
AGP104-200-A1
BTU104-410-A1
differsArchitecture
APascal
BTuring
differsShader units
A1,920 (CUDA cores)
B2,560 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,506 MHz
B1,605 MHz
B: 99 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,683 MHz
B1,770 MHz
B: 87 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR5
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A256.3 GB/s
B448 GB/s
B: 191.7 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A150 W (TDP)
B215 W (TDP)
B: 65 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: 8 GB GDDR5, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.