GeForce RTX 2080 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +47.4%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 47.4% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2080 is better2
Board power 35 W lower215 W (TDP) vs 250 W (TDP)
Launch price $300 lower$699 vs $999
Where GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is better17
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 35.7% lower34 s vs 46 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 35.1% lower22 s vs 30 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 12.2% lower137 s vs 154 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 14.2% lower86 s vs 99 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 40.3% lower65 s vs 91 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 40.1% lower30 s vs 42 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 44% lower102 s vs 148 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 47.4% lower59 s vs 88 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 23.9% lower208 s vs 258 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 27.4% lower98 s vs 125 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 35.4% lower282 s vs 382 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 21.9% lower117 s vs 142 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 24.7% faster2,845 samples/min vs 2,282 samples/min
Shader units 1,408 more4,352 (CUDA cores) vs 2,944 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 3 GB more11 GB vs 8 GB
Memory bus 96 bit more352 bit vs 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 168 GB/s more616 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 35.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 208046 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti33.9 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 34A · 460100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 35.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
46 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 45.6–46.47; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
33.9 s · community measurement, sample 53 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 53 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 33.42–34.68; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 35.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 208029.9 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti22.1 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 22A · 30050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 35.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
29.9 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 29.03–30.16; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-02-15; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
22.1 s · community measurement, sample 39 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 20.82–22.62; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 12.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080154.1 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti137.4 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 137A · 1540200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 12.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
154.1 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 152.69–157.19; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
137.4 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 133.31–141.35; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 14.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 208098.5 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti86.2 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 86A · 99050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 14.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
98.5 s · community measurement, sample 21 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 21 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 97.32–100.95; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-02-15; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
86.2 s · community measurement, sample 31 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 31 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 83.91–91.02; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 40.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 208090.7 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti64.6 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 65A · 910100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 40.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
90.7 s · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 89.25–91.98; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
64.6 s · community measurement, sample 37 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 37 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.21–66.02; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 40.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 208042.3 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti30.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 30A · 420100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 40.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
42.3 s · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 28 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 41.25–43.06; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
30.2 s · community measurement, sample 114 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 114 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 29.68–31.01; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 44%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080147.6 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti102.5 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 102A · 1480200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 44% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
147.6 s · community measurement, sample 21 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 21 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 144.74–149.57; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
102.5 s · community measurement, sample 36 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 36 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 100.68–104.8; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 47.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 208087.6 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti59.4 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 59A · 880100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 47.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
87.6 s · community measurement, sample 31 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 31 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 84.82–90.74; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
59.4 s · community measurement, sample 116 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 116 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 58.18–61.69; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 23.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080257.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti208.1 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 208A · 2580200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 23.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
257.8 s · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 253.99–269.8; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
208.1 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 200.44–213.46; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 27.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080124.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti98 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 98A · 1250200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 27.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
124.8 s · community measurement, sample 32 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 32 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 122.08–129.2; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
98 s · community measurement, sample 132 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 132 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 96.31–101.31; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 35.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080382 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti282 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 282A · 38202505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 35.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
382 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 376.39–389.81; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
282 s · community measurement, sample 34 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 34 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 274.18–287.61; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 21.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2080142.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 Ti116.6 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 117A · 1420200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 21.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
142.2 s · community measurement, sample 25 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 25 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 138.57–145.08; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
116.6 s · community measurement, sample 111 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 111 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 113.38–120.82; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 24.7%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 20802,281.6 samples/minGeForce RTX 2080 Ti2,845.2 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,282B · 2,84505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 24.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
2,281.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 36 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 36 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2232.27–2305.83; submissions 2025-08-02 to 2026-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2,845.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 131 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 131 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2732.17–2950.36; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-23; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (43)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.7 | 37.4 | B +32.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 51.5 | 37.7 | B +36.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 51.1 | 38.2 | B +33.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 56 | 40.1 | B +39.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 27.3 | 20.3 | B +34.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.1 | 19.3 | B +35.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.7 | 19 | B +35% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 164.6 | 153.6 | B +7.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 163.6 | 147.3 | B +11.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 163.6 | 151.1 | B +8.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 167.1 | 151.7 | B +10.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 95.3 | 81.4 | B +17.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 95 | 82.1 | B +15.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 88.3 | 67.1 | B +31.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 91.5 | 68.4 | B +33.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 93 | 71 | B +31% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 99.6 | 72.9 | B +36.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 42.2 | 31.9 | B +32.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 153.1 | 114.5 | B +33.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 152.1 | 113.4 | B +34.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 159 | 120.2 | B +32.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 165.2 | 116.5 | B +41.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 72.8 | 53.5 | B +36.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 287 | 236.4 | B +21.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 291.2 | 234.3 | B +24.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 288.2 | 236 | B +22.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 305 | 242.3 | B +25.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 129.4 | 101.6 | B +27.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 379.7 | 290 | B +30.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 373.7 | 282.3 | B +32.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 374.9 | 290.2 | B +29.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 374.1 | 277.9 | B +34.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 151 | 129.3 | B +16.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,237.5 | 2,799.5 | B +25.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,369.8 | 3,084.5 | B +30.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,340.5 | 3,235.5 | B +38.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,445 | 3,223 | B +31.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,422.1 | 3,218.9 | B +32.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,594.9 | 3,362.6 | B +29.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,549.7 | 3,343.5 | B +31.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,266.7 | 2,872.1 | B +26.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,237 | 2,903.2 | B +29.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,213 | 2,818.4 | B +27.4% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (71)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 543.8 | 521.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 529.4 | 514 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 931 | 860.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 918.1 | 866.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 50.3 | 37.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 51.5 | 38.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 53.3 | 39.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 27.6 | 19.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 27.1 | 20.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.6 | 19.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.7 | 19.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 167.7 | 153.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 171.2 | 154.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 175.2 | 159.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 96.5 | 81.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 94.5 | 82.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 94.5 | 82.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 99.3 | 84.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100 | 84.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 88.5 | 66.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 86.8 | 67.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 97.3 | 70.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 40.8 | 30.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 40.1 | 31.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 41.1 | 31.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 42.3 | 30.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 48.1 | 33.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 47.1 | 33.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 153.2 | 112.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 152.1 | 108.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 158.9 | 111.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 73.2 | 56.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 73.6 | 55.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 72.2 | 53.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 89.1 | 59.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 156 | 98.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 92.4 | 63.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 290.3 | 234.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 278.3 | 223.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 285.9 | 225.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 129.3 | 99.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 129.6 | 101.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 125.2 | 99.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 125.1 | 99.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 128.9 | 100.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 133 | 105.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 380.7 | 288.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 354.5 | 270.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 434.6 | 330 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 186.1 | 131.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 211.4 | 132.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 150.3 | 128.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 141.9 | 118.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 175.9 | 137.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 164.9 | 137.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,664.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,360.2 | 2,112.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,678.2 | 2,339.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,729.4 | 2,461.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,987.6 | 2,835.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,152.2 | 2,754.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,511.6 | 3,373.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,456.1 | 3,108.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,160.8 | 2,792.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,796.1 | 2,627.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,167.7 | 2,749.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,233.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,495.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,225.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,330 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 3,011.2 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2080 | B · GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU104-400A-A1 | TU102-300A-K1-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,944 (CUDA cores) | 4,352 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,408 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,515 MHz | 1,350 MHz | A: 165 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,710 MHz | 1,545 MHz | A: 165 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 11 GB | B: 3 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 352 bit | B: 96 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 448 GB/s | 616 GB/s | B: 168 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 215 W (TDP) | 250 W (TDP) | B: 35 W higher |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU104-400A-A1
BTU102-300A-K1-A1
differsArchitecture
ATuring
BTuring
equalShader units
A2,944 (CUDA cores)
B4,352 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,408 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,515 MHz
B1,350 MHz
A: 165 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,710 MHz
B1,545 MHz
A: 165 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B11 GB
B: 3 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A256 bit
B352 bit
B: 96 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A448 GB/s
B616 GB/s
B: 168 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A215 W (TDP)
B250 W (TDP)
B: 35 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: 11 GB GDDR6, 352-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.