NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 8 GB GDDR6
- 215 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 42 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 15% of the leader
- Launch price
- $699
- MSRP, US
- Release
- September 20, 2018
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
543.85 s
lower is better
Median of 14 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 529.44 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX)
930.98 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 918.07 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
46.02 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 40 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 53.25 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 51.54 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 55.97 s | 8 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 51.08 s | 4 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 51.49 s | 4 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 50.29 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 49.66 s | 3 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
29.86 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 20 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 26.67 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 25.63 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 25.66 s | 7 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 26.12 s | 4 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 27.27 s | 4 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 27.58 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 27.07 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
154.09 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 29 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 175.21 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 171.21 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 167.13 s | 7 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 163.64 s | 3 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 163.59 s | 3 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 167.71 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 164.61 s | 3 of 11 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
98.52 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 21 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 100 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 99.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 94.98 s | 7 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 94.46 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 95.31 s | 3 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 96.53 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 94.47 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
90.68 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 22 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 97.33 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 86.83 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 99.58 s | 7 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 93.02 s | 3 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 91.51 s | 4 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 88.45 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 88.26 s | 4 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
42.33 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 28 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 47.1 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 48.1 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 42.29 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 41.14 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 42.15 s | 3 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 40.83 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 40.14 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA)
147.63 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 21 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 158.87 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 152.05 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 165.23 s | 8 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 158.97 s | 3 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 152.09 s | 3 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 153.23 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 153.09 s | 3 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
87.56 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 31 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 92.44 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 156.03 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 89.08 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 72.15 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 72.81 s | 3 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 73.17 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 73.62 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
257.84 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 24 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 285.89 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 278.33 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 305.03 s | 7 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 288.22 s | 3 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 291.17 s | 4 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 290.3 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 287.01 s | 3 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
124.77 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 32 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 132.98 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 128.89 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 125.1 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 125.21 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 129.37 s | 3 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 129.31 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 129.63 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
382.01 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 20 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 434.56 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 354.5 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 374.1 s | 7 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 374.86 s | 2 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 373.73 s | 3 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 380.69 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 379.73 s | 2 of 9 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
142.22 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 25 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 164.93 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 175.93 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 141.87 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 150.26 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 151.01 s | 3 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 186.13 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 211.37 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
1,729 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 1,678 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 1,360 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 1,665 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
2,282 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 36 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (17)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 2,152 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 1,988 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 2,168 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 1,796 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 2,161 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 2,213 samples/min | 33 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 2,237 samples/min | 28 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 2,237 samples/min | 29 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 2,267 samples/min | 30 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 2,550 samples/min | 30 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 2,595 samples/min | 26 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 2,422 samples/min | 24 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 2,445 samples/min | 21 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 2,341 samples/min | 17 of 30 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 2,456 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 2,370 samples/min | 17 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 2,512 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- TU104-400A-A1
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 2,944 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,515 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,710 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 8 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR6
- Memory bus
- 256 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 448 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 215 W (TDP)
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. The card’s PCIe version is unknown.