GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +88.1%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER leads in this scenario (up to 88.1% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is better2
Board power 75 W lower175 W (TDP) vs 250 W (TDP)
Launch price $300 lower$399 vs $699
Where GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is better15
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 23.8% lower46 s vs 57 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 10.9% lower29 s vs 32 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 85.5% lower149 s vs 277 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 79.5% lower90 s vs 162 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 24% lower100 s vs 124 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 40.6% lower40 s vs 56 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 17.2% lower163 s vs 191 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 46.5% lower81 s vs 118 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 52.7% lower302 s vs 461 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 59.6% lower119 s vs 189 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 37.3% lower372 s vs 510 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 73.2% lower133 s vs 230 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 10.9% faster2,293 samples/min vs 2,067 samples/min
Shader units 896 more3,072 (CUDA cores) vs 2,176 (CUDA cores)
Memory bandwidth 47.9 GB/s more495.9 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 23.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER57 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER46.1 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 46A · 570100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 23.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
57 s · community measurement, sample 32 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 32 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 56.4–57.77; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
46.1 s · community measurement, sample 33 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 33 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 45.46–47.66; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 10.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER31.9 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER28.8 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 29A · 32050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 10.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
31.9 s · community measurement, sample 21 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 21 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 31.4–33.3; submissions 2021-07-27 to 2022-02-23; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
28.8 s · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 27.21–29.41; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 85.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER276.9 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER149.3 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 149A · 2770200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 85.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
276.9 s · community measurement, sample 31 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 31 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 272.42–281.42; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
149.3 s · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 148.22–154.89; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-21; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 79.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER161.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER90.2 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 90A · 1620100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 79.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
161.8 s · community measurement, sample 37 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 37 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 160.24–163.89; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
90.2 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 89.4–91.43; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 24%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER123.7 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER99.8 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 100A · 1240200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 24% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
123.7 s · community measurement, sample 116 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 116 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 121.33–125.24; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
99.8 s · community measurement, sample 121 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 121 submissions (25 outliers excluded), interquartile range 97.95–101.06; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 40.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER55.7 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER39.7 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 40A · 560100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 40.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
55.7 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 55.02–56.53; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-12; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
39.7 s · community measurement, sample 61 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 61 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 39.27–40.2; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 17.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER191.3 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER163.3 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 163A · 1910200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 17.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
191.3 s · community measurement, sample 100 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 100 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 188.53–194.19; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
163.3 s · community measurement, sample 112 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 112 submissions (21 outliers excluded), interquartile range 161.87–166.92; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 46.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER118 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER80.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 81A · 1180100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 46.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
118 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 116.65–119.66; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-12; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
80.5 s · community measurement, sample 66 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 66 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.23–81.66; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 52.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER461.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER301.9 sPosition among tested models (23, CUDA)
B · 302A · 46105001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 52.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
461.2 s · community measurement, sample 102 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 102 submissions (14 outliers excluded), interquartile range 452.8–466.95; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
301.9 s · community measurement, sample 117 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 117 submissions (17 outliers excluded), interquartile range 298.38–309.39; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 59.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER189.4 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER118.7 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 119A · 1890200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 59.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
189.4 s · community measurement, sample 34 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 34 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 186.85–192.12; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
118.7 s · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 117.98–120.42; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 37.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER510.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER371.7 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 372A · 51005001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 37.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
510.2 s · community measurement, sample 102 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 102 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 501.09–522.62; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
371.7 s · community measurement, sample 111 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 111 submissions (18 outliers excluded), interquartile range 366.17–380.44; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 73.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER230.1 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER132.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 133A · 2300200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 73.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
230.1 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 228.62–231.78; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-12; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
132.8 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (16 outliers excluded), interquartile range 132.15–134.59; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 10.9%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER2,067.3 samples/minGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER2,292.6 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,067B · 2,29305,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 10.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
2,067.3 samples/min · community measurement, sample 102 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 102 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2005.87–2124.27; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-03-07; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
2,292.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2221.12–2330.97; submissions 2025-07-24 to 2026-09-26; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (37)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 63.6 | 50.6 | B +25.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 65.7 | 50.7 | B +29.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 66.3 | 55.6 | B +19.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.6 | 25.4 | B +20.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 29.6 | 25.2 | B +17.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.6 | 25.1 | B +22% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 292.8 | 158.6 | B +84.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 299.2 | 159.1 | B +88.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 300.7 | 163.3 | B +84.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 159.9 | 90.8 | B +76.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 158.6 | 90.1 | B +76% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.7 | 90.8 | B +31.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 126 | 92.8 | B +35.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 58.1 | 39.6 | B +46.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 56.5 | 38.8 | B +45.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 210.8 | 149.5 | B +41% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 220.1 | 156.7 | B +40.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 106 | 67.7 | B +56.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 101.9 | 67 | B +52.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 450.2 | 284.6 | B +58.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 449.2 | 283.5 | B +58.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 190.3 | 123.3 | B +54.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 183.7 | 120.5 | B +52.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 522.2 | 372 | B +40.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 538.5 | 376.7 | B +43% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 250.5 | 141.5 | B +77.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 245.2 | 140.8 | B +74.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,099.4 | 2,234.5 | B +6.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,307.1 | 2,431.9 | B +5.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,288.4 | 2,485.1 | B +8.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,315.7 | 2,462.5 | B +6.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,378.7 | 2,644.5 | B +11.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,450.3 | 2,634.8 | B +7.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,138.1 | 2,282.1 | B +6.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,158.4 | 2,327.6 | B +7.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,049 | 2,253.2 | B +10% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,113.6 | 2,571.2 | B +21.6% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (88)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,076.9 | 518.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,070.2 | 522.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,716.3 | 917.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,792.2 | 885.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 63.1 | 50.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 61.9 | 49.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 71.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 66 | 51.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 69.1 | 53.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.5 | 28.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.2 | 25.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 31.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.7 | 25.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 31.4 | 26.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 298.5 | 160.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 299.4 | 163.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 350.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 305.3 | 165.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 320.8 | 166.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 167.9 | 96.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 161.7 | 91.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 169.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 166.7 | 91.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 171.4 | 94 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 170.5 | 95.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 115.3 | 87 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 115.4 | 88 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 143.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 113 | 89.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 120.2 | 96.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 109.5 | 90.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 57.1 | 40.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 56 | 38.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 57.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 55.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63.3 | 44.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 60.8 | 44.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 207.7 | 149.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 209.1 | 150.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 222.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 179.3 | 150.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 188.6 | 155.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 180.7 | 147.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 103.4 | 71.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 110.8 | 68.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 123.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 119.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 206.2 | 139.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 124.3 | 86 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 439.5 | 282.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 446.9 | 283.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 543.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 417 | 277.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 430.7 | 279 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 394 | 253.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 192.4 | 129.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 189.9 | 119.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 193.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 193.2 | 120.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 195.3 | 122.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 196.7 | 127.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 520.3 | 378.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 528.8 | 380.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 604.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 481.9 | 356.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 566.8 | 432 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 503.2 | 385.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 260.1 | 409.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 260.2 | 194.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 244 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 232.2 | 134.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 276.1 | 165 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 264.5 | 159.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,408 | 1,631.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,445.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,328.5 | 1,769.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,442.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,380.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,993.1 | 2,171.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,928.2 | 2,202.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,487.8 | 2,537.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,259.4 | 2,425.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,180.5 | 2,430.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,879.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,883.9 | 2,168.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,755.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,646.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,667.7 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | B · GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU106-410-A1 | TU104-450-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,176 (CUDA cores) | 3,072 (CUDA cores) | B: 896 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,470 MHz | 1,650 MHz | B: 180 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,650 MHz | 1,815 MHz | B: 165 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 448 GB/s | 495.9 GB/s | B: 47.9 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 175 W (TDP) | 250 W (TDP) | B: 75 W higher |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU106-410-A1
BTU104-450-A1
differsArchitecture
ATuring
BTuring
equalShader units
A2,176 (CUDA cores)
B3,072 (CUDA cores)
B: 896 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,470 MHz
B1,650 MHz
B: 180 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,650 MHz
B1,815 MHz
B: 165 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A448 GB/s
B495.9 GB/s
B: 47.9 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A175 W (TDP)
B250 W (TDP)
B: 75 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.