GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +92.4%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER leads in this scenario (up to 92.4% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2070 is better2
Board power 75 W lower175 W (TDP) vs 250 W (TDP)
Launch price $200 lower$499 vs $699
Where GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is better15
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 27.7% lower46 s vs 59 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 14.6% lower29 s vs 33 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 89.1% lower149 s vs 282 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 84.6% lower90 s vs 166 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 26.5% lower100 s vs 126 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 38.2% lower40 s vs 55 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 19.4% lower163 s vs 195 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 43.1% lower81 s vs 115 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 56.5% lower302 s vs 473 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 62.8% lower119 s vs 193 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 43.1% lower372 s vs 532 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 73.6% lower133 s vs 231 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 8.7% faster2,293 samples/min vs 2,109 samples/min
Shader units 768 more3,072 (CUDA cores) vs 2,304 (CUDA cores)
Memory bandwidth 47.9 GB/s more495.9 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 27.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 207058.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER46.1 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 46A · 590100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 27.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
58.8 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.49–61.43; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-10; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
46.1 s · community measurement, sample 33 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 33 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 45.46–47.66; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 14.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 207033 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER28.8 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 29A · 33050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 14.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
33 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.03–33.24; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
28.8 s · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 27.21–29.41; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 89.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070282.3 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER149.3 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 149A · 2820200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 89.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
282.3 s · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 28 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 276.74–290.98; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
149.3 s · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 148.22–154.89; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-21; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 84.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070166.4 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER90.2 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 90A · 1660100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 84.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
166.4 s · community measurement, sample 61 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 61 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 160.19–171.32; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2022-01-09; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
90.2 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 89.4–91.43; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 26.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070126.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER99.8 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 100A · 1260200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 26.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
126.2 s · community measurement, sample 126 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 126 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 123.54–129.3; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-09-12; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
99.8 s · community measurement, sample 121 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 121 submissions (25 outliers excluded), interquartile range 97.95–101.06; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 38.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 207054.8 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER39.7 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 40A · 550100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 38.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
54.8 s · community measurement, sample 43 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 43 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 54.03–56.24; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-06-14; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
39.7 s · community measurement, sample 61 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 61 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 39.27–40.2; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 19.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070195 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER163.3 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 163A · 1950200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 19.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
195 s · community measurement, sample 117 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 117 submissions (14 outliers excluded), interquartile range 191.09–199.46; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-09-12; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
163.3 s · community measurement, sample 112 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 112 submissions (21 outliers excluded), interquartile range 161.87–166.92; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 43.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070115.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER80.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 81A · 1150100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 43.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
115.2 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 111.3–119.47; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-06-14; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
80.5 s · community measurement, sample 66 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 66 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.23–81.66; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 56.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070472.6 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER301.9 sPosition among tested models (23, CUDA)
B · 302A · 47305001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 56.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
472.6 s · community measurement, sample 127 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 127 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 460.59–488.31; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2022-01-09; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
301.9 s · community measurement, sample 117 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 117 submissions (17 outliers excluded), interquartile range 298.38–309.39; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 62.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070193.2 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER118.7 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 119A · 1930200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 62.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
193.2 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 189.69–197.47; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2022-01-09; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
118.7 s · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 117.98–120.42; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 43.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070532.1 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER371.7 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 372A · 53205001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 43.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
532.1 s · community measurement, sample 120 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 120 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 512.02–553.12; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-09-12; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
371.7 s · community measurement, sample 111 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 111 submissions (18 outliers excluded), interquartile range 366.17–380.44; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 73.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070230.6 sGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER132.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 133A · 2310200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 73.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
230.6 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 225.65–237.11; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-06-14; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
132.8 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (16 outliers excluded), interquartile range 132.15–134.59; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-31; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 8.7%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 20702,108.7 samples/minGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER2,292.6 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,109B · 2,29305,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is ahead by 8.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
2,108.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 64 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 64 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1999.79–2175.31; submissions 2025-07-22 to 2026-07-07; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
2,292.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2221.12–2330.97; submissions 2025-07-24 to 2026-09-26; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (46)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.9 | 49.9 | B +30.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.2 | 50.6 | B +27% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 67.6 | 50.7 | B +33.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 67.8 | 55.6 | B +22% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 67.8 | 53.2 | B +27.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.5 | 25.4 | B +19.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.8 | 25.4 | B +21% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.6 | 25.2 | B +21.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.5 | 25.1 | B +21.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 312.4 | 163.2 | B +91.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 297.9 | 158.6 | B +87.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 306.1 | 159.1 | B +92.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 310.5 | 163.3 | B +90.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 164.5 | 91.2 | B +80.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 165 | 90.8 | B +81.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 168.2 | 90.1 | B +86.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.3 | 88 | B +35.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.9 | 90.8 | B +32.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 129.7 | 92.8 | B +39.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 58.2 | 39.6 | B +47% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 59.1 | 38.8 | B +52.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 212.8 | 150.6 | B +41.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 211.6 | 149.5 | B +41.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 226.1 | 156.7 | B +44.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 103.5 | 67.7 | B +53% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 105.7 | 67 | B +57.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 457.8 | 283.9 | B +61.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 456.1 | 284.6 | B +60.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 461.6 | 283.5 | B +62.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 196.2 | 123.3 | B +59.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 194.8 | 120.5 | B +61.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 548.4 | 380.6 | B +44.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 532.1 | 372 | B +43% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 560.2 | 376.7 | B +48.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 258.5 | 141.5 | B +82.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 260.1 | 140.8 | B +84.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,072.7 | 2,234.5 | B +7.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,282.5 | 2,431.9 | B +6.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,322.6 | 2,485.1 | B +7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,275.9 | 2,462.5 | B +8.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,452.8 | 2,644.5 | B +7.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,450.5 | 2,634.8 | B +7.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,159.9 | 2,282.1 | B +5.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,222.6 | 2,327.6 | B +4.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,085.9 | 2,253.2 | B +8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,131.7 | 2,571.2 | B +20.6% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (75)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,086.1 | 518.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,072.6 | 522.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,907.1 | 917.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,721.5 | 885.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64 | 50.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 70.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 69.8 | 51.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.9 | 28.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 31.6 | 25.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30 | 26.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 309.9 | 160.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 340.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 321.4 | 165.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 318.4 | 166.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 159.4 | 96.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 170.4 | 91.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 168.1 | 94 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 177.3 | 95.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 118.1 | 87 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 131.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 122.6 | 89.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 117.9 | 96.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 111.6 | 90.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 55.1 | 40.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 56.3 | 38.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 61.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 62.1 | 44.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63.4 | 44.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 209.7 | 149.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 213.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 196.1 | 150.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 186.9 | 155.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 183.1 | 147.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 102.4 | 71.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 105.6 | 68.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 123 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 133.3 | 139.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 126.5 | 86 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 458.6 | 282.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 505.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 445.3 | 277.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 429.3 | 279 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 410.2 | 253.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 192.5 | 129.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 194.8 | 119.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 196.3 | 120.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 197.3 | 122.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 205.1 | 127.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 545.7 | 378.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 528.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 554.3 | 356.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 574.2 | 432 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 518.5 | 385.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 255.7 | 409.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 261.9 | 194.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 252.2 | 134.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 268.9 | 165 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 273.2 | 159.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,401.3 | 1,755.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,404.9 | 1,631.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,347.9 | 1,646.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,375.7 | 1,667.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,467.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,433.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,406.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,246.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,829.9 | 2,171.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,926.6 | 2,202.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,300.4 | 2,537.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,178.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,266 | 2,425.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,245.7 | 2,430.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,896.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,031.8 | 2,168.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,769.3 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2070 | B · GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU106-400A-A1 | TU104-450-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,304 (CUDA cores) | 3,072 (CUDA cores) | B: 768 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,410 MHz | 1,650 MHz | B: 240 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,620 MHz | 1,815 MHz | B: 195 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 448 GB/s | 495.9 GB/s | B: 47.9 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 175 W (TDP) | 250 W (TDP) | B: 75 W higher |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU106-400A-A1
BTU104-450-A1
differsArchitecture
ATuring
BTuring
equalShader units
A2,304 (CUDA cores)
B3,072 (CUDA cores)
B: 768 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,410 MHz
B1,650 MHz
B: 240 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,620 MHz
B1,815 MHz
B: 195 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A448 GB/s
B495.9 GB/s
B: 47.9 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A175 W (TDP)
B250 W (TDP)
B: 75 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.