NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 8 GB GDDR6
- 175 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 46 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 14% of the leader
- Launch price
- $499
- MSRP, US
- Release
- October 17, 2018
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
1,086.05 s
lower is better
Median of 9 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,072.61 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX)
1,907.14 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,721.51 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
58.84 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 42 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 67.79 s | 13 of 19 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 69.77 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 70.1 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 67.79 s | 10 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 67.6 s | 7 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 64.19 s | 7 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 64.01 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 64.95 s | 6 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
32.97 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 20 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 30.04 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 31.61 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 30.49 s | 9 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 30.58 s | 6 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 30.8 s | 6 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 30.91 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 30.49 s | 4 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
282.28 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 28 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 318.39 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 321.39 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 340.26 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 310.46 s | 14 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 306.08 s | 11 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 297.91 s | 10 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 309.88 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 312.44 s | 7 of 11 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
166.4 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 61 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 177.3 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 168.1 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 170.43 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 168.2 s | 6 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 164.97 s | 7 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 159.41 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 164.52 s | 5 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
111.59 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 27 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 117.94 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 122.55 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 131.08 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 126.23 s | 10 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 129.74 s | 7 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 119.95 s | 6 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 118.08 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 119.32 s | 5 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
54.82 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 43 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 63.45 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 62.09 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 61.75 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 59.06 s | 5 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 58.22 s | 6 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 55.15 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 56.32 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA)
183.12 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 27 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 186.89 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 196.06 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 213.31 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 194.99 s | 10 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 226.13 s | 6 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 211.58 s | 6 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 209.67 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 212.84 s | 5 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
115.2 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 45 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 126.47 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 133.35 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 122.96 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 105.7 s | 5 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 103.51 s | 5 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 102.44 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 105.62 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
410.19 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 25 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 429.31 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 445.25 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 505.88 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 472.57 s | 11 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 461.62 s | 7 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 456.1 s | 7 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 458.62 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 457.75 s | 6 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
193.15 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 45 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 205.13 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 197.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 196.35 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 194.84 s | 6 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 196.15 s | 7 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 192.46 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 194.85 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
518.47 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 27 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 574.23 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 554.29 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 528.79 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 532.06 s | 11 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 560.19 s | 7 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 532.06 s | 7 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 545.73 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 548.45 s | 6 of 9 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
230.58 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 42 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 273.25 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 268.88 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 252.25 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 260.12 s | 6 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 258.55 s | 6 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 255.72 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 261.9 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
1,246 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 | 1,406 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 1,433 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 1,467 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 1,376 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 1,348 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 1,405 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 1,401 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
2,109 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 64 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (18)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 1,927 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 1,830 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 2,032 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 1,896 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 2,132 samples/min | 42 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 2,086 samples/min | 35 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 2,073 samples/min | 34 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 2,223 samples/min | 31 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 2,160 samples/min | 32 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 2,451 samples/min | 32 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 2,453 samples/min | 28 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 2,276 samples/min | 27 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 2,323 samples/min | 22 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 2,246 samples/min | 18 of 30 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 2,266 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2 | 2,179 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 2,282 samples/min | 19 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 2,300 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- TU106-400A-A1
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 2,304 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,410 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,620 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 8 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR6
- Memory bus
- 256 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 448 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 175 W (TDP)
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. The card’s PCIe version is unknown.