GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +84.5%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in this scenario (up to 84.5% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2070 is better1
Board power 40 W lower175 W (TDP) vs 215 W (TDP)
Where GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is better14
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 30.2% lower45 s vs 59 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 13.1% lower29 s vs 33 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 81.2% lower156 s vs 282 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 64.8% lower101 s vs 166 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 23.4% lower90 s vs 112 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 20.6% lower45 s vs 55 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 24% lower148 s vs 183 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 16.6% lower99 s vs 115 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 59.9% lower257 s vs 410 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 50% lower129 s vs 193 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 34.7% lower385 s vs 518 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 50.4% lower153 s vs 231 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 6% faster2,235 samples/min vs 2,109 samples/min
Shader units 256 more2,560 (CUDA cores) vs 2,304 (CUDA cores)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 30.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 207058.8 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.2 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 45A · 590100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 30.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
58.8 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.49–61.43; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-10; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.2 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.61–45.89; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 13.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 207033 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER29.2 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 29A · 33050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 13.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
33 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.03–33.24; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
29.2 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.79–29.82; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 81.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070282.3 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER155.8 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 156A · 2820200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 81.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
282.3 s · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 28 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 276.74–290.98; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
155.8 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 153.23–158.95; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 64.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070166.4 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER101 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 101A · 1660100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 64.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
166.4 s · community measurement, sample 61 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 61 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 160.19–171.32; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2022-01-09; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
101 s · community measurement, sample 148 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 148 submissions (17 outliers excluded), interquartile range 99.16–102.19; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 23.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070111.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER90.4 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 90A · 1120100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 23.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
111.6 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 108.46–119.84; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
90.4 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.69–91.7; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 20.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 207054.8 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 45A · 550100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 20.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
54.8 s · community measurement, sample 43 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 43 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 54.03–56.24; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-06-14; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.5 s · community measurement, sample 115 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 115 submissions (24 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.86–45.95; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 24%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070183.1 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER147.7 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 148A · 1830200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 24% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
183.1 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 178.97–197.3; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
147.7 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.41–149.78; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 16.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070115.2 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER98.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 99A · 1150100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 16.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
115.2 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 111.3–119.47; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-06-14; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
98.8 s · community measurement, sample 122 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 122 submissions (18 outliers excluded), interquartile range 97.1–100.18; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 59.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070410.2 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER256.6 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 257A · 4100200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 59.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
410.2 s · community measurement, sample 25 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 25 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 397.21–415.04; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
256.6 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 254.13–262.18; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 50%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070193.2 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER128.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 129A · 1930200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 50% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
193.2 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 189.69–197.47; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2022-01-09; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
128.8 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 126.86–131.25; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 34.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070518.5 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER384.8 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 385A · 51802505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 34.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
518.5 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 503.35–553.61; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
384.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 379–393.16; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 50.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070230.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER153.3 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 153A · 2310200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 50.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
230.6 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 225.65–237.11; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-06-14; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
153.3 s · community measurement, sample 115 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 115 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 150.54–157.53; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 6%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 20702,108.7 samples/minGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER2,234.5 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,109B · 2,23505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
2,108.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 64 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 64 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1999.79–2175.31; submissions 2025-07-22 to 2026-07-07; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2,234.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2150.53–2296.29; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-11-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (51)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.9 | 49.1 | B +32.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.2 | 49.9 | B +28.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 67.6 | 50.5 | B +34% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 67.8 | 54.4 | B +24.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 67.8 | 52.2 | B +29.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.5 | 27.1 | B +12.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.8 | 26.7 | B +15.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.6 | 25.8 | B +18.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.5 | 25.8 | B +18.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 312.4 | 169.4 | B +84.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 297.9 | 165.2 | B +80.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 306.1 | 168 | B +82.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 310.5 | 171.7 | B +80.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 164.5 | 101.2 | B +62.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 165 | 100.4 | B +64.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 168.2 | 100 | B +68.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.3 | 88.1 | B +35.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.9 | 90.9 | B +31.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 129.7 | 93.7 | B +38.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 126.2 | 99 | B +27.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 58.2 | 44.6 | B +30.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 59.1 | 43.7 | B +35.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 212.8 | 154 | B +38.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 211.6 | 153.3 | B +38% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 226.1 | 161.1 | B +40.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 195 | 165.1 | B +18.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 103.5 | 80.7 | B +28.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 105.7 | 79.6 | B +32.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 457.8 | 288.2 | B +58.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 456.1 | 290.1 | B +57.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 461.6 | 290.6 | B +58.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 472.6 | 305.5 | B +54.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 196.2 | 131.7 | B +48.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 194.8 | 128.7 | B +51.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 548.4 | 383.5 | B +43% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 532.1 | 377.2 | B +41% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 560.2 | 383.5 | B +46.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 532.1 | 376.9 | B +41.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 258.5 | 161.2 | B +60.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 260.1 | 160.2 | B +62.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,072.7 | 2,189.4 | B +5.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,282.5 | 2,427.4 | B +6.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,245.7 | 2,447.3 | B +9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,322.6 | 2,467.7 | B +6.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,275.9 | 2,394.9 | B +5.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,452.8 | 2,619 | B +6.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,450.5 | 2,604.6 | B +6.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,159.9 | 2,374.9 | B +10% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,222.6 | 2,262.8 | B +1.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,085.9 | 2,228.4 | B +6.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,131.7 | 2,225.8 | B +4.4% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (72)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,086.1 | 574.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,072.6 | 559.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,907.1 | 970.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,721.5 | 979.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64 | 49.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 70.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 69.8 | 51.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30.9 | 26.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 31.6 | 26.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 30 | 26.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 309.9 | 168.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 340.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 321.4 | 172.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 318.4 | 177.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 159.4 | 101.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 170.4 | 100.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 168.1 | 103 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 177.3 | 104.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 118.1 | 88 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 131.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 122.6 | 91.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 117.9 | 96.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 55.1 | 43.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 56.3 | 43.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 61.8 | 45.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 62.1 | 51.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63.4 | 50.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 209.7 | 153.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 213.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 196.1 | 154.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 186.9 | 157.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 102.4 | 82 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 105.6 | 83.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 123 | 98.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 133.3 | 172.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 126.5 | 104.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 458.6 | 287.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 505.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 445.3 | 283.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 429.3 | 285.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 192.5 | 130.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 194.8 | 132.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 196.3 | 129.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 197.3 | 130.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 205.1 | 135.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 545.7 | 382.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 528.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 554.3 | 360.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 574.2 | 434.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 255.7 | 167.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 261.9 | 166.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 252.2 | 152 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 268.9 | 192 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 273.2 | 183.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,401.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,404.9 | 1,556.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,347.9 | 1,531.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,375.7 | 1,546.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,467.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,433.1 | 1,562.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,406.2 | 1,460.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,246.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,829.9 | 2,143.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,926.6 | 2,079.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,300.4 | 2,522.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,178.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,266 | 2,413.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,896.1 | 2,072.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,031.8 | 2,123.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,580.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,569.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,338.4 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2070 | B · GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU106-400A-A1 | TU104-410-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,304 (CUDA cores) | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | B: 256 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,410 MHz | 1,605 MHz | B: 195 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,620 MHz | 1,770 MHz | B: 150 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s | equal |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 175 W (TDP) | 215 W (TDP) | B: 40 W higher |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU106-400A-A1
BTU104-410-A1
differsArchitecture
ATuring
BTuring
equalShader units
A2,304 (CUDA cores)
B2,560 (CUDA cores)
B: 256 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,410 MHz
B1,605 MHz
B: 195 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,620 MHz
B1,770 MHz
B: 150 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A448 GB/s
B448 GB/s
equalExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A175 W (TDP)
B215 W (TDP)
B: 40 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.