GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2070: specs and benchmark comparison
Rendering and compute
depends on the taskBenchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is better5
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 64.1% lower172 s vs 282 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 32.1% lower311 s vs 410 s
Video memory 3 GB more11 GB vs 8 GB
Memory bus 96 bit more352 bit vs 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 36.4 GB/s more484.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
Where GeForce RTX 2070 is better7
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 90.2% lower33 s vs 63 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 27.7% lower166 s vs 213 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 11.4% lower112 s vs 124 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 20.4% lower183 s vs 220 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 156.7% faster2,109 samples/min vs 821 samples/min
Board power 75 W lower175 W (TDP) vs 250 W (TDP)
Launch price $200 lower$499 vs $699
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- 4.7% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti56.2 sGeForce RTX 207058.8 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
A · 56B · 590100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 4.7% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
56.2 s · community measurement, sample 76 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 76 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 55.4–57.39; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
58.8 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.49–61.43; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-10; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 90.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti62.7 sGeForce RTX 207033 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 33A · 63050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 is ahead by 90.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
62.7 s · community measurement, sample 23 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 23 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 60.35–64.88; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-02-09; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
33 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.03–33.24; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 64.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti172 sGeForce RTX 2070282.3 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
A · 172B · 2820200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 64.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
172 s · community measurement, sample 58 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 58 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 169.09–175.74; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
282.3 s · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 28 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 276.74–290.98; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 27.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti212.6 sGeForce RTX 2070166.4 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 166A · 2130100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 is ahead by 27.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
212.6 s · community measurement, sample 23 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 23 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 203.94–221.54; submissions 2020-09-06 to 2022-01-26; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
166.4 s · community measurement, sample 61 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 61 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 160.19–171.32; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2022-01-09; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 11.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti124.3 sGeForce RTX 2070111.6 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 112A · 1240100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 is ahead by 11.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
124.3 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 122.73–126.56; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
111.6 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 108.46–119.84; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 20.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti220.4 sGeForce RTX 2070183.1 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 183A · 2200200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 is ahead by 20.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
220.4 s · community measurement, sample 41 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 41 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 218.9–224.53; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
183.1 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 178.97–197.3; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 32.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti310.6 sGeForce RTX 2070410.2 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
A · 311B · 4100200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 32.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
310.6 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 308.52–315.53; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
410.2 s · community measurement, sample 25 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 25 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 397.21–415.04; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 0.5% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti521.3 sGeForce RTX 2070518.5 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 518A · 52102505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 0.5% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
521.3 s · community measurement, sample 41 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 41 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 514.79–527.59; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
518.5 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 503.35–553.61; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-03; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 156.7%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti821.4 samples/minGeForce RTX 20702,108.7 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 821B · 2,10905,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 is ahead by 156.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
821.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 57 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 57 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 808.6–840.55; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-07; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
2,108.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 64 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 64 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1999.79–2175.31; submissions 2025-07-22 to 2026-07-07; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (37)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 63.2 | 64.9 | A +2.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 62.2 | 64.2 | A +3.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.1 | 67.6 | A +5.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 69.9 | 67.8 | B +3.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.3 | 67.8 | A +5.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 61.2 | 30.5 | B +100.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 192.2 | 312.4 | A +62.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 192.3 | 297.9 | A +54.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 194.8 | 306.1 | A +57.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 197.9 | 310.5 | A +56.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 121.3 | 119.3 | B +1.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 123.4 | 119.9 | B +2.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 124.1 | 129.7 | A +4.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 127.4 | 126.2 | B +0.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 248.4 | 212.8 | B +16.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 245.2 | 211.6 | B +15.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 236 | 226.1 | B +4.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 216.7 | 195 | B +11.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 330.5 | 457.8 | A +38.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 329.7 | 456.1 | A +38.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 337.5 | 461.6 | A +36.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 359 | 472.6 | A +31.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 491.8 | 548.4 | A +11.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 487.7 | 532.1 | A +9.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 478.1 | 560.2 | A +17.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 472.4 | 532.1 | A +12.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 821.5 | 2,072.7 | B +152.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 868 | 2,282.5 | B +163% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 883.9 | 2,245.7 | B +154.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 878.4 | 2,322.6 | B +164.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 879.8 | 2,275.9 | B +158.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 889.7 | 2,452.8 | B +175.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 889.8 | 2,450.5 | B +175.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 830.7 | 2,159.9 | B +160% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 842.2 | 2,222.6 | B +163.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 829 | 2,085.9 | B +151.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 820.8 | 2,131.7 | B +159.7% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (93)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 529.5 | 1,086.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 532.3 | 1,072.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 62.5 | 64 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 65.4 | 69.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 61.8 | 31.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 61.3 | 30 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 189.1 | 309.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 193.9 | 321.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 185 | 318.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 216.5 | 170.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 221.1 | 168.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 221.4 | 177.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.6 | 118.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 122.4 | 122.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.1 | 117.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 115.4 | 54.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 115.5 | 61.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 119.4 | 62.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 117.4 | 63.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 245.9 | 209.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 214.6 | 196.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 213.3 | 186.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 132.1 | 115.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 133.7 | 123 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 172.2 | 133.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 135.1 | 126.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 331 | 458.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 341.4 | 445.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 334.7 | 429.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 330.9 | 193.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 326.6 | 196.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 333.8 | 197.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 334.1 | 205.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 493.3 | 545.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 460.2 | 554.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 521.5 | 574.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 447.9 | 230.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 436.1 | 252.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 480.3 | 268.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 462.5 | 273.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 936.1 | 1,401.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 873.8 | 1,404.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 895.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 976.1 | 1,347.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 931.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 928.2 | 1,467.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 960.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 886.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 905.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 925.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 969.1 | 1,406.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 685.3 | 1,829.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 699.6 | 1,926.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 935.9 | 2,300.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 780.2 | 2,178.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 888.7 | 2,266 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 726.9 | 1,896.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 695.2 | 2,031.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 1,907.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 1,721.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 70.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 30.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 30.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 30.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 30.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 340.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 159.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 164.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 165 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 168.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 131.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 55.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 56.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 58.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 59.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 213.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 102.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 105.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 103.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 105.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 505.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 192.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 194.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 196.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 194.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 528.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 255.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 261.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 258.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 260.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,375.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,433.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,246.1 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | B · GeForce RTX 2070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GP102-350-K1-A1 | TU106-400A-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 3,584 (CUDA cores) | 2,304 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,481 MHz | 1,410 MHz | A: 71 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,582 MHz | 1,620 MHz | B: 38 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 11 GB | 8 GB | A: 3 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 352 bit | 256 bit | A: 96 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 484.4 GB/s | 448 GB/s | A: 36.4 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 250 W (TDP) | 175 W (TDP) | A: 75 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
AGP102-350-K1-A1
BTU106-400A-A1
differsArchitecture
APascal
BTuring
differsShader units
A3,584 (CUDA cores)
B2,304 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,481 MHz
B1,410 MHz
A: 71 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,582 MHz
B1,620 MHz
B: 38 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A11 GB
B8 GB
A: 3 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR5X
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A352 bit
B256 bit
A: 96 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A484.4 GB/s
B448 GB/s
A: 36.4 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A250 W (TDP)
B175 W (TDP)
A: 75 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: 11 GB GDDR5X, 352-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070?
It depends on the task: rendering and compute: results disagree.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.