NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 4 GB GDDR5
- 75 W
- PSU 300 W+
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 62 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 3% of the leader
- Launch price
- $149
- MSRP, US
- Release
- April 23, 2019
- Power supply
- 300 W+
- manufacturer recommendation
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81a
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
1,732.32 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
134.44 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 76 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 156.28 s | 19 of 19 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 157.64 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 156.12 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 158.29 s | 23 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 153.25 s | 18 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 149.07 s | 19 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 147.68 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 147.47 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
130.31 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 23 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 133.85 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 127.36 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 126.16 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 137.33 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
493.72 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 46 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 571.99 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 549.22 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 571.12 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 540.81 s | 23 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 536.14 s | 17 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 516.21 s | 16 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 538.88 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
517.53 s
lower is better
Median of 9 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 472.87 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 486.69 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 499.38 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
282.19 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 31 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 307.37 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 289.14 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 294.84 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 301.95 s | 21 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 294.83 s | 15 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 283.13 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 324.15 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 277.47 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
271.64 s
lower is better
Median of 10 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 258.83 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 240.22 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 253.82 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA)
437.76 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 29 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 502.7 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 457.75 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 472.78 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 485.12 s | 21 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 499.53 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 472.32 s | 15 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 482.95 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
336.27 s
lower is better
Median of 8 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 389.51 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 297.96 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 319.94 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
796.06 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 22 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 911 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 891.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 915.67 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 942.62 s | 22 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 905.81 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 894.56 s | 15 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 867.53 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 924.46 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
753.57 s
lower is better
Median of 8 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 750.64 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 702.56 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 722.43 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA)
1,426.62 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 16GeForce GTX 1660 Ti709
- 17GeForce GTX 1660782
- 18GeForce GTX 1070800
- 19GeForce GTX 980 Ti1,018
- 20GeForce GTX 16501,427
Median of 49 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 1,565.51 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 1,639.99 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 1,885.34 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 1,215.79 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 1,376.72 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 1,373.03 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,360.83 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
1,437.14 s
lower is better
Median of 7 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 1,068 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 1,073.46 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
457 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 21 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (12)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 | 499 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 513 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 501 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 439 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 523 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 529 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 420 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 490 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 497 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 531 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 455 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 468 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
424 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 143 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (17)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 364 samples/min | 46 of 48 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 392 samples/min | 46 of 46 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 356 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 417 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 428 samples/min | 55 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 443 samples/min | 48 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 439 samples/min | 46 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 429 samples/min | 44 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 429 samples/min | 46 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 477 samples/min | 47 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 470 samples/min | 40 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 430 samples/min | 41 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 433 samples/min | 35 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 449 samples/min | 29 of 30 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 489 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 475 samples/min | 34 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 509 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 896 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,485 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,665 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 4 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR5
- Memory bus
- 128 bit
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 75 W (board power)
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Interface
- PCIe 3.0
- Length (reference / Founders Edition)
- 130 mm
- Thickness (slots)
- 2
- Power connectors (reference)
- 1x 6-pin
Checked against NVIDIA’s official specifications on 2026-11-14. Fields NVIDIA does not list are left empty. The original GDDR5 version is listed. GDDR6 version: base clock 1410 MHz, boost 1590 MHz.
Specifications: NVIDIA, checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. Manufacturer recommendation: 300 W or more. Enter your PSU wattage to check.
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Enter the maximum graphics card length for your case.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. Enter the PCIe version of the motherboard slot.