Graphics card rankings
Each table is one benchmark at one version. There is no overall score: different benchmarks measure different things.
Rendering and compute
Blender Benchmark 2.82
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · lower is better
| # | Model | Chart | s | Of leader | At launch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 234 | 100% | $999 | |
| 2 | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 285 | 82% | $699 | |
| 3 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 290 | 81% | $499 | |
| 4 | GeForce RTX 2080 | 291 | 80% | $699 | |
| 5 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 330 | 71% | $699 | |
| 6 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 450 | 52% | $399 | |
| 7 | GeForce RTX 2070 | 456 | 51% | $499 | |
| 8 | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 474 | 49% | $399 | |
| 9 | GeForce RTX 2060 | 478 | 49% | — | |
| 10 | GeForce GTX 1080 | 483 | 48% | — | |
| 11 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 544 | 43% | $279 | |
| 12 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 546 | 43% | $229 | |
| 13 | GeForce GTX 1070 | 575 | 41% | $379 | |
| 14 | GeForce GTX 1660 | 583 | 40% | $219 | |
| 15 | GeForce GTX 1650 | 895 | 26% | $149 |
No ranking data yet for: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
How the difference is calculated is explained in the methodology.