NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 6 GB GDDR6
- 125 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 54 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 5% of the leader
- Launch price
- $229
- MSRP, US
- Release
- October 29, 2019
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
1,123.52 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,096.36 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
81.58 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 21GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU78
- 22GeForce GTX 108081
- 23GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER82
- 24GeForce GTX 1660 Ti84
- 25GeForce GTX 107090
Median of 46 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 95.3 s | 16 of 19 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 93.55 s | 7 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 94.8 s | 14 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 90.59 s | 10 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 89.55 s | 12 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 88.57 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 88.31 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
77.02 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 12GeForce GTX 1080 Ti61
- 13GeForce GTX 1660 Ti74
- 14GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER77
- 15GeForce GTX 108087
- 16GeForce GTX 1070108
Median of 43 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 79.65 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 76.88 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 77.35 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
308.42 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 19GeForce RTX 2060297
- 20GeForce GTX 1660 Ti300
- 21GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER308
- 22GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU317
- 23GeForce GTX 1070318
Median of 22 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 351.79 s | 16 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 336.4 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 330.69 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 331.86 s | 16 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 331.77 s | 13 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 322.06 s | 11 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 333.94 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 336.78 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
309.88 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 11GeForce RTX 2070166
- 12GeForce GTX 1080 Ti213
- 13GeForce GTX 1080304
- 14GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER310
- 15GeForce GTX 1070397
Median of 20 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 311.63 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 315.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 307.01 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.92
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
194.29 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 9GeForce GTX 1080 Ti119
- 10GeForce RTX 2060137
- 11GeForce GTX 1080177
- 12GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER194
- 13GeForce GTX 1070208
Median of 20 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 175.97 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 167.55 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 180.53 s | 13 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 177.25 s | 10 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 171.93 s | 9 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 153.92 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 165.4 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
152.63 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 173.78 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 153.67 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 154.13 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA)
288.29 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 11GeForce GTX 1080 Ti217
- 12GeForce RTX 2060252
- 13GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER288
- 14GeForce GTX 1070 Ti296
- 15GeForce GTX 1660 Ti298
Median of 91 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 280.11 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 292.98 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 271.12 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 302.84 s | 10 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 287.84 s | 10 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 287.53 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 287.32 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
192.86 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 192.07 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 191.4 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
564.37 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 15GeForce GTX 1080525
- 16GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q549
- 17GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER564
- 18GeForce GTX 1660 Ti578
- 19GeForce GTX 1070604
Median of 99 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 499.71 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 555.86 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 527.63 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 543.62 s | 11 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 546.26 s | 12 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 546.29 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 542.98 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
431.21 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 443.92 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 439.14 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA)
690.89 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 11GeForce RTX 2070532
- 12GeForce RTX 2060588
- 13GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER691
- 14GeForce GTX 1070 Ti693
- 15GeForce GTX 1080704
Median of 91 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 756.98 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 845.37 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 686.4 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 714.8 s | 11 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 696.33 s | 9 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 704.29 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 701.99 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
1,041.03 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 605.44 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 604.11 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
865 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (10)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 848 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 835 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 651 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 946 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 823 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 896 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 884 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 851 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 859 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 848 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
754 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 102 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (18)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 679 samples/min | 44 of 48 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 700 samples/min | 45 of 46 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 692 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 617 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 736 samples/min | 51 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 751 samples/min | 44 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 755 samples/min | 42 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 769 samples/min | 40 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 752 samples/min | 41 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 832 samples/min | 42 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 819 samples/min | 36 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 779 samples/min | 35 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 821 samples/min | 30 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 809 samples/min | 26 of 30 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 843 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2 | 807 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 826 samples/min | 27 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 851 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- TU116-300-A1
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 1,408 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,530 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,785 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 6 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR6
- Memory bus
- 192 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 336 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 125 W (TDP)
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. The card’s PCIe version is unknown.