GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 2060: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +123.6%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 leads in this scenario (up to 123.6% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce RTX 2060 is better9
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 16.5% lower70 s vs 82 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 117.7% lower35 s vs 77 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 93.3% lower160 s vs 310 s
Blender Benchmark 2.92 41.9% lower137 s vs 194 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 14.2% lower252 s vs 288 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 14.2% lower494 s vs 564 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 17.5% lower588 s vs 691 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 108.8% faster1,574 samples/min vs 754 samples/min
Shader units 512 more1,920 (CUDA cores) vs 1,408 (CUDA cores)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 16.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER81.6 sGeForce RTX 206070 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 70A · 820100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is ahead by 16.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
81.6 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.4–87.83; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
70 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 65.53–74.02; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 117.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER77 sGeForce RTX 206035.4 sPosition among tested models (17, OptiX)
B · 35A · 77050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is ahead by 117.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
77 s · community measurement, sample 43 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 43 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 76.1–78.57; submissions 2020-09-04 to 2021-01-16; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
35.4 s · community measurement, sample 170 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 170 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 34.18–38.26; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2022-01-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 3.7% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER308.4 sGeForce RTX 2060297.5 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 297A · 3080200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 3.7% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
308.4 s · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 305.17–310.96; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
297.5 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 281.72–323.97; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 93.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER309.9 sGeForce RTX 2060160.3 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 160A · 3100100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is ahead by 93.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
309.9 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 305.49–311.77; submissions 2020-09-05 to 2021-01-16; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
160.3 s · community measurement, sample 127 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 127 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 132.46–176.11; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2022-01-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 41.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.92
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER194.3 sGeForce RTX 2060136.9 sPosition among tested models (13, CUDA)
B · 137A · 1940100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is ahead by 41.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
194.3 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 179.96–203.49; submissions 2021-03-21 to 2021-07-23; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
136.9 s · community measurement, sample 57 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 57 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 133.09–150.94; submissions 2021-03-14 to 2021-12-29; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 14.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER288.3 sGeForce RTX 2060252.5 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 252A · 2880200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is ahead by 14.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
288.3 s · community measurement, sample 91 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 91 submissions (19 outliers excluded), interquartile range 284.81–290.84; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
252.5 s · community measurement, sample 219 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 219 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 242.91–271.44; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 14.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER564.4 sGeForce RTX 2060494.2 sPosition among tested models (23, CUDA)
B · 494A · 56405001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is ahead by 14.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
564.4 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 555.7–572.24; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-30; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
494.2 s · community measurement, sample 215 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 215 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 426.04–538.06; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 17.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER690.9 sGeForce RTX 2060587.9 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 588A · 69105001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is ahead by 17.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
690.9 s · community measurement, sample 91 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 91 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 679.94–700.55; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-05-10; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
587.9 s · community measurement, sample 206 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 206 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 527.27–641.21; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-02-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 108.8%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER753.8 samples/minGeForce RTX 20601,573.6 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 754B · 1,57405,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is ahead by 108.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
753.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 102 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 102 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 722.53–764.51; submissions 2025-07-20 to 2026-04-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
1,573.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 162 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 162 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1437.27–1643.46; submissions 2025-07-20 to 2026-07-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (31)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 89.6 | 74.3 | B +20.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 90.6 | 74.6 | B +21.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 94.8 | 79.9 | B +18.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 93.6 | 80.7 | B +15.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 95.3 | 78.6 | B +21.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 322.1 | 295.4 | B +9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 331.8 | 297.5 | B +11.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 331.9 | 310.5 | B +6.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 351.8 | 327.1 | B +7.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 171.9 | 130.9 | B +31.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 177.3 | 133.2 | B +33.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 180.5 | 139.4 | B +29.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 287.8 | 249.4 | B +15.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 302.8 | 258.3 | B +17.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 546.3 | 478 | B +14.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 543.6 | 473.2 | B +14.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 696.3 | 588.8 | B +18.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 714.8 | 603.8 | B +18.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 754.8 | 1,524.6 | B +102% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 700.4 | 1,522.3 | B +117.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 679.1 | 1,426.3 | B +110% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 825.9 | 1,712.1 | B +107.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 809.1 | 1,743.7 | B +115.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 820.6 | 1,759.7 | B +114.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 779.4 | 1,713.7 | B +119.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 818.7 | 1,830.5 | B +123.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 831.8 | 1,856.7 | B +123.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 751.9 | 1,613.2 | B +114.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 768.9 | 1,627.8 | B +111.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 750.8 | 1,529 | B +103.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 735.9 | 1,522.9 | B +106.9% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (101)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,123.5 | 1,092.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,096.4 | 1,058.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 88.6 | 75.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 88.3 | 74.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 77.4 | 36.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 76.9 | 37.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 79.7 | 42.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 333.9 | 310.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 336.8 | 322.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 330.7 | 351 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 336.4 | 332.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 307 | 175.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 315.3 | 179.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 311.6 | 176.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 153.9 | 127.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 165.4 | 127.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 167.5 | 133.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 176 | 132.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 154.1 | 63.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 153.7 | 66.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 173.8 | 74.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 152.6 | 74.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 287.5 | 258.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 287.3 | 252.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 271.1 | 247.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 293 | 259.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 280.1 | 238.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 191.4 | 137.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 192.1 | 139.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 192.9 | 150.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 546.3 | 488 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 543 | 490.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 527.6 | 468.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 555.9 | 481.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 499.7 | 437.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 439.1 | 180.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 443.9 | 215.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 431.2 | 209.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 704.3 | 597.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 702 | 603.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 686.4 | 595.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 845.4 | 644.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 757 | 622.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 604.1 | 234.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 605.4 | 263.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 1,041 | 288.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 847.7 | 548 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 858.5 | 1,079.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 851 | 991.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 884.3 | 946.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 895.9 | 983.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 823.1 | 1,011.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 945.9 | 1,223 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 650.6 | 1,115.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 834.7 | 1,087.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 847.8 | 1,136.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 864.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 850.6 | 1,886.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 807 | 905 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 843.2 | 1,762.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 616.7 | 1,447.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 692 | 1,487.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 1,892.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 1,781.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 93.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 38.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 37.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 37.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 35.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 40.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 188.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 163.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 159.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 142.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 180.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 161.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 70.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 63.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 63.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 63 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 135.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 117.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 112.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 111 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 239 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 226.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 203.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 194.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 183.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 211.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 646.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 364.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 382.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 265.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 255.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 299.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 315.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,194.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 874.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 977.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,032.5 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | B · GeForce RTX 2060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU116-300-A1 | no data | no data for B |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 1,408 (CUDA cores) | 1,920 (CUDA cores) | B: 512 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,530 MHz | 1,370 MHz | A: 160 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,785 MHz | 1,680 MHz | A: 105 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 192 bit | 192 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 336 GB/s | no data | no data for B |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 125 W (TDP) | 160 W (board power) | not directly comparable |
| Recommended PSU | no data | 500 W | no data for A |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 | no data for A |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | no data | 229 mm | no data for A |
| Thickness (slots) | no data | 2 | no data for A |
| Power connectors (reference) | no data | 1x 8-pin | no data for A |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU116-300-A1
Bno data
no data for BArchitecture
ATuring
BTuring
equalShader units
A1,408 (CUDA cores)
B1,920 (CUDA cores)
B: 512 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,530 MHz
B1,370 MHz
A: 160 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,785 MHz
B1,680 MHz
A: 105 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A6 GB
B6 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A192 bit
B192 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A336 GB/s
Bno data
no data for BExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A125 W (TDP)
B160 W (board power)
not directly comparableTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
Ano data
B500 W
no data for AInterface
Ano data
BPCIe 3.0
no data for ALength (reference / Founders Edition)
Ano data
B229 mm
no data for APartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
Ano data
B2
no data for APower connectors (reference)
Ano data
B1x 8-pin
no data for A
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: 6 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060: 6 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060checked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.