NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 6 GB GDDR6
- 160 W
- PSU 500 W+
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 48 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 11% of the leader
- Release
- January 7, 2019
- Power supply
- 500 W+
- manufacturer recommendation
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
1,092.48 s
lower is better
Median of 12 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,058.51 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX)
1,892.71 s
lower is better
Median of 7 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,781.09 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
70.05 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 99 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 78.65 s | 14 of 19 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 80.72 s | 5 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 93.49 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 79.89 s | 12 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 74.58 s | 8 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 74.29 s | 8 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 75.08 s | 4 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 74.2 s | 7 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
42.22 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 81 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 37.05 s | 12 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 36.94 s | 4 of 4 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 40.87 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 35.38 s | 11 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 35.46 s | 7 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 37.18 s | 7 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 38.78 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 37.33 s | 5 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
297.5 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 68 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 327.14 s | 13 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 332.36 s | 5 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 351.03 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 310.46 s | 15 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 297.54 s | 8 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 295.37 s | 9 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 310.55 s | 6 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 322.2 s | 8 of 11 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
176.49 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 60 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 179.72 s | 10 of 10 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 175.57 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 180.13 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 160.3 s | 9 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 142.75 s | 4 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 159.5 s | 5 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 188.89 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 163.05 s | 4 of 5 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
132.72 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 51 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 136.94 s | 10 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 133.82 s | 5 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 161.95 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 139.39 s | 12 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 133.21 s | 8 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 130.95 s | 8 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 127.48 s | 4 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 127.38 s | 7 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
74.64 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 52 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 74.74 s | 9 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 66.54 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 63.68 s | 11 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 63.02 s | 6 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 63.39 s | 7 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 70.47 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 63.58 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA)
238.68 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 47 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 259.86 s | 10 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 247.06 s | 5 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 252.49 s | 12 of 22 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 258.32 s | 8 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 249.41 s | 8 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 258.24 s | 4 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 252.82 s | 7 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
150.81 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 45 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 239.03 s | 10 of 10 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 139.8 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 137.35 s | 11 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 111.03 s | 6 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 112.86 s | 7 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 135.35 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 117.59 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
437.58 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 56 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 481.78 s | 10 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 468.93 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 494.25 s | 12 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 473.21 s | 8 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 478 s | 9 of 15 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 487.96 s | 4 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 490.14 s | 8 of 10 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
209.76 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 56 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 211.51 s | 9 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 215.55 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 180.89 s | 9 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 183.18 s | 4 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 194.82 s | 6 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 226.71 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 203.41 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
622.73 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 48 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (8)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 644.76 s | 10 of 12 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 595.07 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1 | 646.78 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 587.9 s | 12 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 603.8 s | 8 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 588.77 s | 8 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 597.71 s | 4 of 5 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 603.55 s | 7 of 9 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
288.8 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 46 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 299.58 s | 8 of 8 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 263.59 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 234.22 s | 11 of 13 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 255.75 s | 5 of 6 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 265.09 s | 7 of 7 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 364.14 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 382.8 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
1,032 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (14)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 | 977 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 875 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 1,137 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 1,088 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 1,115 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 1,223 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 1,194 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 1,012 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 984 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 947 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 992 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2 | 315 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 1,079 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 548 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
1,574 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 162 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (18)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 1,426 samples/min | 39 of 48 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 1,522 samples/min | 40 of 46 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 1,487 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 1,448 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 1,523 samples/min | 44 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 1,529 samples/min | 37 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 1,525 samples/min | 35 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 1,628 samples/min | 33 of 45 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 1,613 samples/min | 34 of 47 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 1,857 samples/min | 35 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 1,831 samples/min | 30 of 41 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 1,714 samples/min | 29 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 1,760 samples/min | 24 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 1,744 samples/min | 20 of 30 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 1,763 samples/min | 9 of 9 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2 | 905 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 1,712 samples/min | 22 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 1,887 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 1,920 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,370 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,680 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 6 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR6
- Memory bus
- 192 bit
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 160 W (board power)
- Recommended PSU
- 500 W
- Interface
- PCIe 3.0
- Length (reference / Founders Edition)
- 229 mm
- Thickness (slots)
- 2
- Power connectors (reference)
- 1x 8-pin
Checked against NVIDIA’s official specifications on 2026-11-14. Fields NVIDIA does not list are left empty. The original 6 GB version (2019) is listed. A 12 GB version with 2176 CUDA cores was released later.
Specifications: NVIDIA, checked November 14, 2026. Release date: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. Manufacturer recommendation: 500 W or more. Enter your PSU wattage to check.
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Enter the maximum graphics card length for your case.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. Enter the PCIe version of the motherboard slot.