GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
BNVIDIA · Ampere
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 8 GB GDDR6 / GDDR6X
- 200 W
- PSU 600 W+
December 2, 2020 · $399 at launch
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +247.2%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 247.2% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2060 is better1
Board power 40 W lower160 W (board power) vs 200 W (board power)
Where GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is better15
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 134% lower30 s vs 70 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 129.9% lower18 s vs 42 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 117.8% lower137 s vs 297 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 185.3% lower62 s vs 176 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 101% lower66 s vs 133 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 90.8% lower39 s vs 75 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 116.5% lower110 s vs 239 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 82.6% lower83 s vs 151 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 134.9% lower186 s vs 438 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 137.8% lower88 s vs 210 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 122.3% lower280 s vs 623 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 134.8% lower123 s vs 289 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 76% faster2,769 samples/min vs 1,574 samples/min
Video memory 2 GB more8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory bus 64 bit more256 bit vs 192 bit
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 134%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 206070 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti29.9 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 30A · 700100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 134% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
70 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 65.53–74.02; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
29.9 s · community measurement, sample 166 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 166 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.42–31.22; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 129.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 206042.2 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti18.4 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 18A · 42050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 129.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
42.2 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 39.94–47.39; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
18.4 s · community measurement, sample 129 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 129 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 17.36–19.16; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 117.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060297.5 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti136.6 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 137A · 2970200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 117.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
297.5 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 281.72–323.97; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
136.6 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 131.88–139.28; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 185.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060176.5 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti61.9 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 62A · 176050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 185.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
176.5 s · community measurement, sample 60 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 60 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 167.97–191.14; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
61.9 s · community measurement, sample 136 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 136 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.86–64.03; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 101%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060132.7 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti66 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 66A · 1330100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 101% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
132.7 s · community measurement, sample 51 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 51 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 125.23–140.84; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
66 s · community measurement, sample 106 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 106 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.19–67.57; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 90.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 206074.6 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti39.1 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 39A · 75020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 90.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
74.6 s · community measurement, sample 52 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 52 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 70.49–83.06; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
39.1 s · community measurement, sample 79 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 79 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 38.5–40.04; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 116.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060238.7 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti110.3 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 110A · 2390200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 116.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
238.7 s · community measurement, sample 47 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 47 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 229.05–251.72; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
110.3 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 104.92–112.64; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 82.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060150.8 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti82.6 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 83A · 151050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 82.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
150.8 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 141.23–165.87; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
82.6 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.89–84.17; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 134.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060437.6 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti186.3 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 186A · 4380200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 134.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
437.6 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 413.2–473.78; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
186.3 s · community measurement, sample 100 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 100 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 176.76–190.09; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 137.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060209.8 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti88.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 88A · 2100100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 137.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
209.8 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 200.08–232.81; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
88.2 s · community measurement, sample 85 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 85 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 85.07–89.99; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 122.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060622.7 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti280.1 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 280A · 62302505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 122.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
622.7 s · community measurement, sample 48 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 48 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 581.47–658.17; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
280.1 s · community measurement, sample 96 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 96 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 262.62–285.08; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 134.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060288.8 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti123 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 123A · 2890100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 134.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
288.8 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 273.03–315.34; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
123 s · community measurement, sample 75 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 121.11–125.74; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 76%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 20601,573.6 samples/minGeForce RTX 3060 Ti2,768.8 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 1,574B · 2,76905,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 76% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
1,573.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 162 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 162 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1437.27–1643.46; submissions 2025-07-20 to 2026-07-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2,768.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 223 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 223 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2671.51–2854.8; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (33)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 79.9 | 36.4 | B +119.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 78.6 | 31.4 | B +150.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 35.4 | 17 | B +107.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 37.1 | 17.7 | B +109.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 310.5 | 135.4 | B +129.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 327.1 | 94.2 | B +247.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 160.3 | 61.7 | B +159.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 139.4 | 67.7 | B +106% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 136.9 | 62 | B +120.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63.7 | 35.7 | B +78.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 252.5 | 105 | B +140.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 259.9 | 106.6 | B +143.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 137.4 | 78.1 | B +75.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 494.2 | 204.3 | B +141.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 481.8 | 192.7 | B +150% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 180.9 | 84.3 | B +114.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 587.9 | 282.6 | B +108% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 644.8 | 302.5 | B +113.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 234.2 | 102.3 | B +128.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,524.6 | 2,724.1 | B +78.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,522.3 | 2,644.4 | B +73.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,426.3 | 2,591.8 | B +81.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,712.1 | 3,039.9 | B +77.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,762.8 | 3,061.5 | B +73.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,743.7 | 3,010.3 | B +72.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,759.7 | 3,075.9 | B +74.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,713.7 | 3,089 | B +80.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,830.5 | 3,247.9 | B +77.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,856.7 | 3,216.7 | B +73.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,613.2 | 2,848.7 | B +76.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,627.8 | 2,908 | B +78.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,529 | 2,727.2 | B +78.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,522.9 | 2,733.8 | B +79.5% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (95)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,092.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,058.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,892.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,781.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 75.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 74.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 74.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 74.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 93.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 80.7 | 31.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 38.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 37.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 37.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 35.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 40.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 36.9 | 17.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 310.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 322.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 295.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 297.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 351 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 332.4 | 98.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 188.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 163.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 159.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 142.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 180.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 175.6 | 63.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 179.7 | 62.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 127.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 127.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 130.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 133.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 161.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 133.8 | 59.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 70.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 66.5 | 36.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 74.7 | 41 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 258.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 252.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 249.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 258.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 247.1 | 109.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 135.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 117.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 112.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 111 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 139.8 | 78.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 239 | 135 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 488 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 490.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 478 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 473.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 468.9 | 197.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 226.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 203.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 194.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 183.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 215.6 | 85.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 211.5 | 85.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 597.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 603.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 588.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 603.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 646.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 595.1 | 237.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 364.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 382.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 265.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 255.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 263.6 | 103 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 299.6 | 134.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 548 | 1,932.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,079.4 | 1,779.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 315.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 991.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 946.5 | 1,743.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 983.7 | 1,710.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,011.9 | 1,687.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,194.1 | 1,722.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,223 | 2,024.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,115.4 | 1,869 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,087.6 | 1,765.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,136.9 | 1,765.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 874.8 | 1,793.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 977.2 | 1,831.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,032.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,886.9 | 3,153.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 905 | 2,836.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,447.5 | 2,454.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,487.3 | 2,565.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,732.5 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2060 | B · GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 1,920 (CUDA cores) | 4,864 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,370 MHz | 1,410 MHz | B: 40 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,680 MHz | 1,670 MHz | A: 10 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB | B: 2 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 / GDDR6X | differs |
| Memory bus | 192 bit | 256 bit | B: 64 bit more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 160 W (board power) | 200 W (board power) | B: 40 W higher |
| Recommended PSU | 500 W | 600 W | B: 100 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 | no data | no data for B |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | 229 mm | no data | no data for B |
| Thickness (slots) | 2 | no data | no data for B |
| Power connectors (reference) | 1x 8-pin | no data | no data for B |
Chip
Architecture
ATuring
BAmpere
differsShader units
A1,920 (CUDA cores)
B4,864 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,370 MHz
B1,410 MHz
B: 40 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,680 MHz
B1,670 MHz
A: 10 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A6 GB
B8 GB
B: 2 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6 / GDDR6X
differsMemory bus
A192 bit
B256 bit
B: 64 bit more
Power and dimensions
Board power
A160 W (board power)
B200 W (board power)
B: 40 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A500 W
B600 W
B: 100 W higherInterface
APCIe 3.0
Bno data
no data for BLength (reference / Founders Edition)
A229 mm
Bno data
no data for BPartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A2
Bno data
no data for BPower connectors (reference)
A1x 8-pin
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060: 6 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: 8 GB GDDR6 / GDDR6X, 256-bit bus.
What power supply does the manufacturer recommend?
For NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, 500 W or more; for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, 600 W or more. This is a recommendation for a typical system; also check the power connectors of the specific card model.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Tichecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.