GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison

ANVIDIA · Turing

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

6 GB GDDR6
160 W
PSU 500 W+

January 7, 2019

BNVIDIA · Turing

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

11 GB GDDR6
250 W

September 20, 2018 · $999 at launch

Short verdict

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI

← GeForce RTX 2060GeForce RTX 2080 Ti →

Rendering and compute
B +143%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 143% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where GeForce RTX 2060 is better0

No advantages found in our data.

Where GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is better16

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 106.6% lower34 s vs 70 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 91.1% lower22 s vs 42 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 116.6% lower137 s vs 297 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 104.6% lower86 s vs 176 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 105.3% lower65 s vs 133 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 123% lower33 s vs 75 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 132.9% lower102 s vs 239 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 137.7% lower63 s vs 151 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 110.3% lower208 s vs 438 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 99.7% lower105 s vs 210 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 120.8% lower282 s vs 623 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 109.4% lower138 s vs 289 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 80.8% faster2,845 samples/min vs 1,574 samples/min
Shader units 2,432 more4,352 (CUDA cores) vs 1,920 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 5 GB more11 GB vs 6 GB
Memory bus 160 bit more352 bit vs 192 bit

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 106.6%
GeForce RTX 206070 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti33.9 s
Position among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 34A · 70
0100200300
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 106.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
70 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 65.53–74.02; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
33.9 s · community measurement, sample 53 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 53 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 33.42–34.68; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 91.1%
GeForce RTX 206042.2 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti22.1 s
Position among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 22A · 42
050100150
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 91.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
42.2 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 39.94–47.39; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
22.1 s · community measurement, sample 39 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 20.82–22.62; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 116.6%
GeForce RTX 2060297.5 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti137.4 s
Position among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 137A · 297
0200400600800
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 116.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
297.5 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 281.72–323.97; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
137.4 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 133.31–141.35; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 104.6%
GeForce RTX 2060176.5 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti86.2 s
Position among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 86A · 176
050100150200
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 104.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
176.5 s · community measurement, sample 60 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 60 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 167.97–191.14; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
86.2 s · community measurement, sample 31 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 31 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 83.91–91.02; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 105.3%
GeForce RTX 2060132.7 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti64.6 s
Position among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 65A · 133
0100200300
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 105.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
132.7 s · community measurement, sample 51 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 51 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 125.23–140.84; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
64.6 s · community measurement, sample 37 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 37 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.21–66.02; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 123%
GeForce RTX 206074.6 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti33.5 s
Position among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 33A · 75
020406080
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 123% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
74.6 s · community measurement, sample 52 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 52 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 70.49–83.06; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
33.5 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.62–35.12; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 132.9%
GeForce RTX 2060238.7 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti102.5 s
Position among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 102A · 239
0200400600
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 132.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
238.7 s · community measurement, sample 47 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 47 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 229.05–251.72; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
102.5 s · community measurement, sample 36 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 36 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 100.68–104.8; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 137.7%
GeForce RTX 2060150.8 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti63.5 s
Position among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 63A · 151
050100150200
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 137.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
150.8 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 141.23–165.87; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
63.5 s · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 62.26–67.16; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 110.3%
GeForce RTX 2060437.6 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti208.1 s
Position among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 208A · 438
0200400600800
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 110.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
437.6 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 413.2–473.78; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
208.1 s · community measurement, sample 40 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 40 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 200.44–213.46; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 99.7%
GeForce RTX 2060209.8 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti105.1 s
Position among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 105A · 210
0100200300
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 99.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
209.8 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 200.08–232.81; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
105.1 s · community measurement, sample 38 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 38 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 102.5–110.4; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 120.8%
GeForce RTX 2060622.7 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti282 s
Position among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 282A · 623
02505007501,000
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 120.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
622.7 s · community measurement, sample 48 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 48 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 581.47–658.17; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
282 s · community measurement, sample 34 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 34 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 274.18–287.61; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-20; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
B ahead by 109.4%
GeForce RTX 2060288.8 s
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti137.9 s
Position among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 138A · 289
0100200300
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 109.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
288.8 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 273.03–315.34; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
137.9 s · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 28 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 132.73–144.53; submissions 2021-07-18 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
B ahead by 80.8%
GeForce RTX 20601,573.6 samples/min
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti2,845.2 samples/min
Position among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 1,574B · 2,845
05,00010,00015,000
Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is ahead by 80.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
1,573.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 162 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 162 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1437.27–1643.46; submissions 2025-07-20 to 2026-07-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2,845.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 131 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 131 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2732.17–2950.36; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-23; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (78)

Benchmark	A	B	Difference
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)	75.1	37.5	B +100.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA)	74.2	37.4	B +98.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)	74.3	37.7	B +97.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)	74.6	38.2	B +95.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)	79.9	40.1	B +99%
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)	80.7	38.8	B +108.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)	78.6	39.1	B +101%
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)	37.3	20.4	B +83.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)	37.2	20.3	B +83.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)	35.5	19.3	B +83.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)	35.4	19	B +86.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)	37.1	19.8	B +87.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA)	310.6	153.5	B +102.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA)	322.2	153.6	B +109.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA)	295.4	147.3	B +100.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA)	297.5	151.1	B +96.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA)	310.5	151.7	B +104.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA)	332.4	154.7	B +114.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA)	327.1	159.2	B +105.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX)	163.1	82.6	B +97.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX)	159.5	81.4	B +95.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX)	142.7	82.5	B +73.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX)	160.3	82.1	B +95.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX)	179.7	84.2	B +113.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)	127.5	66.4	B +92%
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)	127.4	67.1	B +89.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)	130.9	68.4	B +91.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)	133.2	71	B +87.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)	139.4	72.9	B +91.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)	133.8	67.6	B +98%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)	136.9	70.9	B +93.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)	63.4	31.9	B +98.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)	63	31.4	B +100.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)	63.7	30.2	B +110.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)	74.7	33.1	B +125.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA)	258.2	112.9	B +128.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA)	252.8	114.5	B +120.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA)	249.4	113.4	B +119.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA)	258.3	120.2	B +114.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA)	252.5	116.5	B +116.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA)	247.1	108.6	B +127.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA)	259.9	111.1	B +133.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX)	112.9	53.5	B +110.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX)	111	53.1	B +109.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX)	137.4	59.4	B +131.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX)	239	98.4	B +143%
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)	488	234.9	B +107.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)	490.1	236.4	B +107.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)	478	234.3	B +104%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)	473.2	236	B +100.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)	494.2	242.3	B +104%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)	481.8	225.1	B +114%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)	194.8	101.6	B +91.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)	183.2	99.5	B +84%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)	180.9	98	B +84.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)	211.5	100.2	B +111%
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA)	597.7	288.3	B +107.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA)	603.5	290	B +108.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA)	588.8	282.3	B +108.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA)	603.8	290.2	B +108.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA)	587.9	277.9	B +111.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA)	644.8	330	B +95.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX)	265.1	129.3	B +104.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX)	255.7	128.9	B +98.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX)	234.2	116.6	B +100.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX)	299.6	137.1	B +118.6%
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,524.6	2,799.5	B +83.6%
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,522.3	2,835.9	B +86.3%
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,712.1	3,084.5	B +80.2%
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,743.7	3,235.5	B +85.6%
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,759.7	3,223	B +83.2%
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,713.7	3,218.9	B +87.8%
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,830.5	3,362.6	B +83.7%
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,856.7	3,343.5	B +80.1%
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,613.2	2,872.1	B +78%
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,627.8	2,903.2	B +78.4%
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,529	2,818.4	B +84.3%
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,522.9	2,792.6	B +83.4%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (49)

Benchmark	A	B	Difference
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)	1,092.5	521.2	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)	1,058.5	514	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX)	1,892.7	860.1	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX)	1,781.1	866.3	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)	93.5	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)	38.8	19.5	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)	40.9	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)	36.9	19.3	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA)	351	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX)	188.9	81.1	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX)	180.1	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX)	175.6	84.5	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)	161.9	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)	70.5	30.4	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)	63.6	31.2	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)	66.5	30.5	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX)	135.3	56.1	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX)	117.6	55.4	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX)	139.8	59.2	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)	468.9	223.3	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)	226.7	99.5	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)	203.4	101.3	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)	215.6	99.5	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA)	646.8	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA)	595.1	270.2	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX)	364.1	131.2	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX)	382.8	132.5	reference
Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX)	263.6	118.1	reference
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	548	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	1,079.4	2,112.4	reference
Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	315.1	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	991.6	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	946.5	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	983.7	2,233.4	reference
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	1,011.9	2,339.9	reference
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	1,194.1	2,461.2	reference
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	1,223	2,495.4	reference
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	1,115.4	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	1,087.6	2,225.7	reference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	1,136.9	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	874.8	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	977.2	2,330	reference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)	1,032.5	—	no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,426.3	2,754.3	reference
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,886.9	3,373.2	reference
Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	905	3,011.2	reference
Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,762.8	3,108.3	reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,447.5	2,627.7	reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)	1,487.3	2,749.3	reference

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Specification	A · GeForce RTX 2060	B · GeForce RTX 2080 Ti	Difference
Chip
GPU chip	no data	TU102-300A-K1-A1	no data for A
Architecture	Turing	Turing	equal
Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.	1,920 (CUDA cores)	4,352 (CUDA cores)	B: 2,432 more
Clocks
Base clock	1,370 MHz	1,350 MHz	A: 20 MHz more
Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.	1,680 MHz	1,545 MHz	A: 135 MHz more
Memory
Video memory	6 GB	11 GB	B: 5 GB more
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6	equal
Memory bus	192 bit	352 bit	B: 160 bit more
Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.	no data	616 GB/s	no data for A
Power and dimensions
Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.	160 W (board power)	250 W (TDP)	not directly comparable
Recommended PSU	500 W	no data	no data for B
Interface	PCIe 3.0	no data	no data for B
Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.	229 mm	no data	no data for B
Thickness (slots)	2	no data	no data for B
Power connectors (reference)	1x 8-pin	no data	no data for B

Chip

GPU chip
Ano data
BTU102-300A-K1-A1
no data for A
Architecture
ATuring
BTuring
equal
Shader units
A1,920 (CUDA cores)
B4,352 (CUDA cores)
B: 2,432 more
Shader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.

Clocks

Base clock
A1,370 MHz
B1,350 MHz
A: 20 MHz more
Boost clock
A1,680 MHz
B1,545 MHz
A: 135 MHz more
Clocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.

Memory

Video memory
A6 GB
B11 GB
B: 5 GB more
Memory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equal
Memory bus
A192 bit
B352 bit
B: 160 bit more
Memory bandwidth
Ano data
B616 GB/s
no data for A
Excludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.

Power and dimensions

Board power
A160 W (board power)
B250 W (TDP)
not directly comparable
TGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A500 W
Bno data
no data for B
Interface
APCIe 3.0
Bno data
no data for B
Length (reference / Founders Edition)
A229 mm
Bno data
no data for B
Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A2
Bno data
no data for B
Power connectors (reference)
A1x 8-pin
Bno data
no data for B

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti have?

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060: 6 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: 11 GB GDDR6, 352-bit bus.

Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (3)

NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060checked November 7, 2026
Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

Telegram VK

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Short verdict

Rendering and compute

Advantages

AWhere GeForce RTX 2060 is better0

BWhere GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is better16

Benchmarks

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 2.93.1

Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

Specifications

Chip

Clocks

Memory

Power and dimensions

Compare with AI

Questions and answers

How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti have?

Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?

See also

Where GeForce RTX 2060 is better0

Where GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is better16