GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +90.9%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in this scenario (up to 90.9% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2060 is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is better16
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 55% lower45 s vs 70 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 44.8% lower29 s vs 42 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 90.9% lower156 s vs 297 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 68.9% lower105 s vs 176 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 46.8% lower90 s vs 133 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 46.9% lower51 s vs 75 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 61.6% lower148 s vs 239 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 44.8% lower104 s vs 151 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 70.5% lower257 s vs 438 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 54.8% lower135 s vs 210 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 61.8% lower385 s vs 623 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 57.1% lower184 s vs 289 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 42% faster2,235 samples/min vs 1,574 samples/min
Shader units 640 more2,560 (CUDA cores) vs 1,920 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 2 GB more8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory bus 64 bit more256 bit vs 192 bit
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 55%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 206070 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.2 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 45A · 700100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 55% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
70 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 65.53–74.02; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.2 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.61–45.89; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 44.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 206042.2 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER29.2 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 29A · 42050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 44.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
42.2 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 39.94–47.39; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
29.2 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.79–29.82; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 90.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060297.5 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER155.8 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 156A · 2970200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 90.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
297.5 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 281.72–323.97; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
155.8 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 153.23–158.95; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 68.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060176.5 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER104.5 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 105A · 176050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 68.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
176.5 s · community measurement, sample 60 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 60 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 167.97–191.14; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
104.5 s · community measurement, sample 38 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 38 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 102.59–107.68; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 46.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060132.7 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER90.4 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 90A · 1330100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 46.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
132.7 s · community measurement, sample 51 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 51 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 125.23–140.84; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
90.4 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.69–91.7; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 46.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 206074.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER50.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 51A · 75020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 46.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
74.6 s · community measurement, sample 52 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 52 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 70.49–83.06; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
50.8 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 49.98–51.74; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 61.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060238.7 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER147.7 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 148A · 2390200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 61.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
238.7 s · community measurement, sample 47 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 47 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 229.05–251.72; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
147.7 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.41–149.78; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 44.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060150.8 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER104.1 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 104A · 151050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 44.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
150.8 s · community measurement, sample 45 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 45 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 141.23–165.87; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
104.1 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 103.53–106.27; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-20; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 70.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060437.6 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER256.6 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 257A · 4380200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 70.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
437.6 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 413.2–473.78; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
256.6 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 254.13–262.18; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 54.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060209.8 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER135.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 135A · 2100100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 54.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
209.8 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 200.08–232.81; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
135.5 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 134.34–137.84; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 61.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060622.7 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER384.8 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 385A · 62302505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 61.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
622.7 s · community measurement, sample 48 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 48 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 581.47–658.17; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
384.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 379–393.16; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 57.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2060288.8 sGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER183.9 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 184A · 2890100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 57.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
288.8 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 273.03–315.34; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-22; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
183.9 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 180.06–189.97; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 42%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 20601,573.6 samples/minGeForce RTX 2070 SUPER2,234.5 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 1,574B · 2,23505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 42% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
1,573.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 162 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 162 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1437.27–1643.46; submissions 2025-07-20 to 2026-07-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2,234.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2150.53–2296.29; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-11-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (75)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 75.1 | 49.3 | B +52.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 74.2 | 49.1 | B +51% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 74.3 | 49.9 | B +48.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 74.6 | 50.5 | B +47.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 79.9 | 54.4 | B +46.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 78.6 | 52.2 | B +50.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 37.3 | 27.1 | B +37.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 37.2 | 26.7 | B +39.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 35.5 | 25.8 | B +37.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 35.4 | 25.8 | B +37.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 37.1 | 26.5 | B +39.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 310.6 | 168.4 | B +84.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 322.2 | 169.4 | B +90.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 295.4 | 165.2 | B +78.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 297.5 | 168 | B +77.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 310.5 | 171.7 | B +80.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 327.1 | 177.3 | B +84.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 163.1 | 101.2 | B +61.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 159.5 | 100.4 | B +58.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 142.7 | 100 | B +42.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 160.3 | 101 | B +58.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 179.7 | 103 | B +74.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 127.5 | 88 | B +44.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 127.4 | 88.1 | B +44.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 130.9 | 90.9 | B +44% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 133.2 | 93.7 | B +42.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 139.4 | 99 | B +40.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 136.9 | 96.4 | B +42.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63.4 | 44.6 | B +42.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63 | 43.7 | B +44.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63.7 | 45.5 | B +40.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 74.7 | 51.5 | B +45% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 258.2 | 153.5 | B +68.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 252.8 | 154 | B +64.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 249.4 | 153.3 | B +62.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 258.3 | 161.1 | B +60.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 252.5 | 165.1 | B +52.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 259.9 | 157.8 | B +64.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 112.9 | 80.7 | B +39.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 111 | 79.6 | B +39.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 137.4 | 98.8 | B +39% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 239 | 172.6 | B +38.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 488 | 287.5 | B +69.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 490.1 | 288.2 | B +70.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 478 | 290.1 | B +64.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 473.2 | 290.6 | B +62.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 494.2 | 305.5 | B +61.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 481.8 | 285.3 | B +68.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 194.8 | 131.7 | B +47.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 183.2 | 128.7 | B +42.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 180.9 | 128.8 | B +40.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 211.5 | 130.6 | B +61.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 597.7 | 382.7 | B +56.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 603.5 | 383.5 | B +57.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 588.8 | 377.2 | B +56.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 603.8 | 383.5 | B +57.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 587.9 | 376.9 | B +56% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 644.8 | 434.6 | B +48.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 265.1 | 161.2 | B +64.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 255.7 | 160.2 | B +59.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 234.2 | 153.3 | B +52.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 299.6 | 192 | B +56% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,524.6 | 2,189.4 | B +43.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,522.3 | 2,143.1 | B +40.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,426.3 | 2,079.7 | B +45.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,712.1 | 2,427.4 | B +41.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,743.7 | 2,447.3 | B +40.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,759.7 | 2,467.7 | B +40.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,713.7 | 2,394.9 | B +39.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,830.5 | 2,619 | B +43.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,856.7 | 2,604.6 | B +40.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,613.2 | 2,374.9 | B +47.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,627.8 | 2,262.8 | B +39% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,529 | 2,228.4 | B +45.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,522.9 | 2,225.8 | B +46.1% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (53)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,092.5 | 574.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,058.5 | 559.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,892.7 | 970.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 1,781.1 | 979.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 93.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 80.7 | 51.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 38.8 | 26.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 40.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 36.9 | 26.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 351 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 332.4 | 172.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 188.9 | 101.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 180.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 175.6 | 100.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 161.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 133.8 | 91.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 70.5 | 43.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 63.6 | 43.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 66.5 | 45.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 247.1 | 154.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 135.3 | 82 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 117.6 | 83.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 139.8 | 98.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 468.9 | 283.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 226.7 | 130.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 203.4 | 132.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 215.6 | 129.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 646.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 595.1 | 360.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 364.1 | 167.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 382.8 | 166.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 263.6 | 152 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 548 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,079.4 | 1,556.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 315.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 991.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 946.5 | 1,531.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 983.7 | 1,580.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,011.9 | 1,546.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,194.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,223 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,115.4 | 1,562.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,087.6 | 1,569.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,136.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 874.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 977.2 | 1,460.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,032.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,886.9 | 2,522.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 905 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,762.8 | 2,413.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,447.5 | 2,072.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,487.3 | 2,123.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,338.4 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2060 | B · GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | no data | TU104-410-A1 | no data for A |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 1,920 (CUDA cores) | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | B: 640 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,370 MHz | 1,605 MHz | B: 235 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,680 MHz | 1,770 MHz | B: 90 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB | B: 2 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 192 bit | 256 bit | B: 64 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | no data | 448 GB/s | no data for A |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 160 W (board power) | 215 W (TDP) | not directly comparable |
| Recommended PSU | 500 W | no data | no data for B |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 | no data | no data for B |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | 229 mm | no data | no data for B |
| Thickness (slots) | 2 | no data | no data for B |
| Power connectors (reference) | 1x 8-pin | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
Ano data
BTU104-410-A1
no data for AArchitecture
ATuring
BTuring
equalShader units
A1,920 (CUDA cores)
B2,560 (CUDA cores)
B: 640 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,370 MHz
B1,605 MHz
B: 235 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,680 MHz
B1,770 MHz
B: 90 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A6 GB
B8 GB
B: 2 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A192 bit
B256 bit
B: 64 bit moreMemory bandwidth
Ano data
B448 GB/s
no data for AExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A160 W (board power)
B215 W (TDP)
not directly comparableTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A500 W
Bno data
no data for BInterface
APCIe 3.0
Bno data
no data for BLength (reference / Founders Edition)
A229 mm
Bno data
no data for BPartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A2
Bno data
no data for BPower connectors (reference)
A1x 8-pin
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060: 6 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060checked November 7, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.