NVIDIA · Pascal
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 4 GB GDDR5
- 75 W
- Render rank (OptiX)
- 66 of 67
- among models tested in Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 · 1% of the leader
- Launch price
- $139
- MSRP, US
- Release
- October 25, 2016
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
2,202.67 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,980.42 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
210.13 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 27GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER126
- 28GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB131
- 29GeForce GTX 1650134
- 30GeForce GTX 1050 Ti210
- 31GeForce GTX 1050269
Median of 39 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 246.17 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 262.14 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 262.17 s | 26 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 246.71 s | 19 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 240.27 s | 21 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 244.56 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 239.25 s | 12 of 12 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
290.97 s
lower is better
Median of 6 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 280.98 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 291.24 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 281.98 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
649.92 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
Median of 21 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 713.57 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 765.37 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 750.33 s | 25 of 25 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 736.93 s | 18 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 724.14 s | 17 of 17 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 740.85 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 714.75 s | 11 of 11 |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
948.25 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 927.73 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 889.82 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
513.59 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 18GeForce GTX 1660201
- 19GeForce GTX 1070217
- 20GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER280
- 21GeForce GTX 1650302
- 22GeForce GTX 1050 Ti514
Median of 28 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (6)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 497.53 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 493.08 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 504.25 s | 16 of 16 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 496.84 s | 14 of 14 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 499.26 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 484.68 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
613.62 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 566.22 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 528.71 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA)
760.23 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 18GeForce GTX 1070360
- 19GeForce GTX 980 Ti368
- 20GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER436
- 21GeForce GTX 1650485
- 22GeForce GTX 1050 Ti760
Median of 26 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (6)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 773.52 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 760.17 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 807.5 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 830.07 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 863.82 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 830.49 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.92
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
905.23 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 635.89 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
1,342.16 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 19GeForce GTX 1070604
- 20GeForce GTX 1660607
- 21GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER859
- 22GeForce GTX 1650943
- 23GeForce GTX 1050 Ti1,342
Median of 24 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (6)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 1,168.18 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 1,271.08 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 1,278.62 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 1,252.92 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 1,414.9 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 1,228.31 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
1,577.22 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 1,483.23 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 1,443.58 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
5,837.08 s
lower is better
Median of 7 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 6,327.45 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 7,319.95 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 9,266.83 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 8,373.13 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 7,575 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 14,116.7 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 9,729.62 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
3,441.11 s
lower is better
Median of 3 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
217 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (15)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 232 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 | 278 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 303 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 274 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 252 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 239 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 236 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 279 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 262 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 219 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 276 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 218 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 229 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 227 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 262 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
209 samples/min
higher is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 63GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB361
- 64GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB274
- 65GeForce GTX 970255
- 66GeForce GTX 1050 Ti209
- 67GeForce GTX 1050174
Median of 70 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (17)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 177 samples/min | 48 of 48 |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 182 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 195 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 180 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 209 samples/min | 58 of 59 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 215 samples/min | 50 of 50 |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 214 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 211 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 208 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 230 samples/min | 49 of 49 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 204 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 213 samples/min | 43 of 43 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 218 samples/min | 37 of 37 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 224 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 227 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 224 samples/min | 38 of 38 |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 238 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- GP107-400-A1
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Shader units
- 768 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,291 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,392 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 4 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR5
- Memory bus
- 128 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 112.1 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 75 W (TDP)
- Interface
- PCIe 3.0 x16
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. Enter the PCIe version of the motherboard slot.