GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1070: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +167.3%NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 leads in this scenario (up to 167.3% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is better2
Board power 75 W lower75 W (TDP) vs 150 W (TDP)
Launch price $240 lower$139 vs $379
Where GeForce GTX 1070 is better10
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 132.9% lower90 s vs 210 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 104.4% lower318 s vs 650 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 136.5% lower217 s vs 514 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 111.4% lower360 s vs 760 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 122.1% lower604 s vs 1,342 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 150.3% faster524 samples/min vs 209 samples/min
Shader units 1,152 more1,920 (CUDA cores) vs 768 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 4 GB more8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory bus 128 bit more256 bit vs 128 bit
Memory bandwidth 144.2 GB/s more256.3 GB/s vs 112.1 GB/s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 132.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti210.1 sGeForce GTX 107090.2 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 90A · 2100100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is ahead by 132.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
210.1 s · community measurement, sample 39 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 39 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 208.16–213.28; submissions 2021-07-13 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
90.2 s · community measurement, sample 83 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 83 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.16–91.66; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 104.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti649.9 sGeForce GTX 1070317.9 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 318A · 6500200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is ahead by 104.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
649.9 s · community measurement, sample 21 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 21 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 639.11–666.02; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
317.9 s · community measurement, sample 54 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 54 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 310.1–327.85; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 136.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti513.6 sGeForce GTX 1070217.2 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 217A · 5140200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is ahead by 136.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
513.6 s · community measurement, sample 28 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 28 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 507.94–520.93; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-01-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
217.2 s · community measurement, sample 159 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 159 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 212.58–221.75; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-10-14; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 111.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti760.2 sGeForce GTX 1070359.7 sPosition among tested models (22, CUDA)
B · 360A · 7600200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is ahead by 111.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
760.2 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 746.79–768.74; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
359.7 s · community measurement, sample 157 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 157 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 350.81–370.44; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-10-14; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 122.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti1,342.2 sGeForce GTX 1070604.4 sPosition among tested models (23, CUDA)
B · 604A · 1,34205001,0001,500Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is ahead by 122.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
1,342.2 s · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1328.71–1356.78; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-01-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
604.4 s · community measurement, sample 154 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 154 submissions (14 outliers excluded), interquartile range 591.84–621.3; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-10-14; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 150.3%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti209.2 samples/minGeForce GTX 1070523.6 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 209B · 52405,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is ahead by 150.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
209.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 197.88–217.04; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-04-28; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
523.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 72 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 72 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 509.18–537.94; submissions 2025-07-25 to 2026-03-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (17)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 239.3 | 104.1 | B +129.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 240.3 | 102.9 | B +133.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 246.7 | 105.6 | B +133.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 262.2 | 112.1 | B +133.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 714.7 | 361.2 | B +97.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 724.1 | 353.4 | B +104.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 736.9 | 363.8 | B +102.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 750.3 | 365.3 | B +105.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 496.8 | 211.7 | B +134.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 504.2 | 213 | B +136.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 177.4 | 474.2 | B +167.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 224.2 | 567.2 | B +153% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 218.1 | 567.4 | B +160.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 213.5 | 567.6 | B +165.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 229.8 | 574 | B +149.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 215.3 | 522.5 | B +142.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 209 | 527.1 | B +152.1% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (91)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 2,202.7 | 988.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,980.4 | 1,012.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 244.6 | 103.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 262.1 | 105.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 246.2 | 104.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 282 | 108.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 291.2 | 107.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 281 | 109.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 291 | 108.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 740.8 | 351.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 765.4 | 329.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 713.6 | 351.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 889.8 | 396.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 927.7 | 386.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 948.2 | 412.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 499.3 | 205.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 484.7 | 208.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 493.1 | 208.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 497.5 | 211.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 528.7 | 205.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 566.2 | 204.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 613.6 | 213.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 863.8 | 401.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 830.5 | 408.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 830.1 | 401 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 807.5 | 393.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 760.2 | 362.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 773.5 | 369 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 635.9 | 239.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 905.2 | 316.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 1,414.9 | 575.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 1,228.3 | 580.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 1,252.9 | 575.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 1,278.6 | 588.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 1,271.1 | 582.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 1,168.2 | 550.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 1,443.6 | 579 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 1,483.2 | 558.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 1,577.2 | 592.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 14,116.7 | 836.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 9,729.6 | 906.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 7,575 | 878.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 8,373.1 | 807.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 9,266.8 | 800.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 7,320 | 763.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 6,327.4 | 867.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 5,837.1 | 850.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 3,441.1 | 778.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 261.7 | 705.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 226.7 | 639.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 229 | 642.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 218 | 653.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 275.9 | 619.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 218.6 | 647.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 262.3 | 631.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 279.4 | 653 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 235.7 | 610.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 238.8 | 662.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 252.3 | 606.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 273.9 | 628.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 303.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 277.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 232 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 217.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 214.1 | 534.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 182.3 | 449.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 238 | 624.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 226.7 | 567.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 223.8 | 572.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 204 | 573.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 208.3 | 540.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 211 | 548 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 179.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 194.6 | 461.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 162.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 630.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 389.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 204 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 322.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 200.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 345.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 377.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 228.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 247.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 558.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 873.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 560.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 1,202.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 752.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 818.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 848.4 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | B · GeForce GTX 1070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GP107-400-A1 | GP104-200-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 768 (CUDA cores) | 1,920 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,152 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,291 MHz | 1,506 MHz | B: 215 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,392 MHz | 1,683 MHz | B: 291 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 4 GB | 8 GB | B: 4 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | equal |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 256 bit | B: 128 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 112.1 GB/s | 256.3 GB/s | B: 144.2 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 75 W (TDP) | 150 W (TDP) | B: 75 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | equal |
Chip
GPU chip
AGP107-400-A1
BGP104-200-A1
differsArchitecture
APascal
BPascal
equalShader units
A768 (CUDA cores)
B1,920 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,152 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,291 MHz
B1,506 MHz
B: 215 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,392 MHz
B1,683 MHz
B: 291 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A4 GB
B8 GB
B: 4 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR5
BGDDR5
equalMemory bus
A128 bit
B256 bit
B: 128 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A112.1 GB/s
B256.3 GB/s
B: 144.2 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A75 W (TDP)
B150 W (TDP)
B: 75 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
BPCIe 3.0 x16
equal
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 4 GB GDDR5, 128-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: 8 GB GDDR5, 256-bit bus.
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: PCIe 3.0 x16. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: PCIe 3.0 x16.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.