GeForce RTX 3050 vs GeForce RTX 3060: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +76.7%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 leads in this scenario (up to 76.7% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3050 is better1
Board power 40 W lower130 W (board power) vs 170 W (board power)
Where GeForce RTX 3060 is better4
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 60% faster2,160 samples/min vs 1,350 samples/min
Shader units 1,024 more3,584 (CUDA cores) vs 2,560 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 4 GB more12 GB vs 8 GB
Memory bus 64 bit more192 bit vs 128 bit
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 60%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 30501,350.2 samples/minGeForce RTX 30602,159.8 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 1,350B · 2,16005,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 is ahead by 60% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
1,350.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 142 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 142 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1198.64–1450.25; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-07-20; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
2,159.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 583 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 583 submissions (49 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2094.29–2210.76; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-11-03; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (13)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,379.4 | 2,155.1 | B +56.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,223.8 | 1,997.7 | B +63.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,127.9 | 1,992.7 | B +76.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,616.5 | 2,411.8 | B +49.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,584.8 | 2,395.8 | B +51.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,587.8 | 2,445.1 | B +54% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,600.7 | 2,432.7 | B +52% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,714.1 | 2,523.8 | B +47.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,656 | 2,537.8 | B +53.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,497.2 | 2,241.3 | B +49.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,428.1 | 2,231.9 | B +56.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,387.3 | 2,148.8 | B +54.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,382.6 | 2,157.9 | B +56.1% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (48)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 66.7 | 43.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 40.3 | 24.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 310.2 | 203.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 134.6 | 86.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 142.4 | 89.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 80.1 | 52.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 227.1 | 155.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 159.1 | 110.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 411 | 264.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 187.8 | 118.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 600.1 | 381.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 251.4 | 169 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 909.7 | 1,331.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 823.9 | 1,370.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 851.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 789.8 | 1,369.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 803.4 | 1,353.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,629.3 | 2,515 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,594.9 | 2,386.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,198.1 | 1,956.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,185.7 | 2,064 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 52.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 47.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 23.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 150.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 141.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 85.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 92.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 86.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 52.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 157.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 155.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 111.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 280.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 285.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 115.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 373.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 414.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 169.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,318.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,343 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,350.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,408 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,512.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,354.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,205.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,260.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,152.8 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3050 | B · GeForce RTX 3060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | 3,584 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,024 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,550 MHz | 1,320 MHz | A: 230 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,780 MHz | 1,780 MHz | equal |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB | B: 4 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 192 bit | B: 64 bit more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 130 W (board power) | 170 W (board power) | B: 40 W higher |
| Recommended PSU | 550 W | 550 W | equal |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 | equal |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAmpere
equalShader units
A2,560 (CUDA cores)
B3,584 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,024 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,550 MHz
B1,320 MHz
A: 230 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,780 MHz
B1,780 MHz
equalClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B12 GB
B: 4 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A128 bit
B192 bit
B: 64 bit more
Power and dimensions
Board power
A130 W (board power)
B170 W (board power)
B: 40 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A550 W
B550 W
equalInterface
APCIe 4.0
BPCIe 4.0
equal
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050: 8 GB GDDR6, 128-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060: 12 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus.
What power supply does the manufacturer recommend?
For NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, 550 W or more; for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060, 550 W or more. This is a recommendation for a typical system; also check the power connectors of the specific card model.
Which PCIe interface do the cards use?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050: PCIe 4.0. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060: PCIe 4.0.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
- ModelNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- ModelNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- ComparisonGeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3050
- ComparisonGeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce RTX 5060
- ComparisonGeForce GTX 1660 vs GeForce RTX 3050
- ComparisonGeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce RTX 4060
- ComparisonGeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce RTX 3070
- ComparisonGeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3060
- ComparisonGeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce RTX 5050
- ComparisonGeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon RX 6600
- ComparisonGeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3050
- ComparisonGeForce RTX 3050 vs Radeon RX 6600
- ComparisonGeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce RTX 3050
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060checked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.