GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 970: specs and benchmark comparison
Rendering and compute
depends on the taskBenchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1650 is better2
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 66.4% faster424 samples/min vs 255 samples/min
Launch price $180 lower$149 vs $329
Where GeForce GTX 970 is better3
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 17.5% lower114 s vs 134 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 12.1% lower482 s vs 541 s
Memory bus 128 bit more256 bit vs 128 bit
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 17.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1650134.4 sGeForce GTX 970114.4 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 114A · 1340100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 is ahead by 17.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
134.4 s · community measurement, sample 76 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 76 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 131.03–137.76; submissions 2021-07-13 to 2022-02-12; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
114.4 s · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 110.31–115.83; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 12.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1650540.8 sGeForce GTX 970482.4 sPosition among tested models (25, CUDA)
B · 482A · 5410200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 is ahead by 12.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
540.8 s · community measurement, sample 63 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 63 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 528.23–552.69; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-08-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
482.4 s · community measurement, sample 23 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 23 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 477.87–497.56; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 66.4%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650424 samples/minGeForce GTX 970254.8 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
B · 255A · 42405,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is ahead by 66.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
424 samples/min · community measurement, sample 143 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 143 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 388.63–450.69; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-10-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
254.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 22 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 22 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 247.96–284.19; submissions 2025-07-22 to 2026-07-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (5)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 149.1 | 141.2 | B +5.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 153.3 | 152.5 | B +0.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 158.3 | 149 | B +6.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 516.2 | 473.5 | B +9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 428.4 | 250.9 | A +70.7% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (104)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,732.3 | 1,839.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 147.7 | 146.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 147.5 | 144.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 156.1 | 149.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 157.6 | 165.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 156.3 | 179.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 130.3 | 166.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 137.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 126.2 | 167.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 127.4 | 162.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 133.9 | 157.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 538.9 | 480 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 536.1 | 482.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 571.1 | 487.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 549.2 | 458.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 572 | 475.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 493.7 | 402.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 499.4 | 673.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 486.7 | 617.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 472.9 | 667.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 517.5 | 605.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 324.2 | 314.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 277.5 | 312.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 283.1 | 309.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 294.8 | 310.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 302 | 303.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 294.8 | 303.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 289.1 | 343.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 307.4 | 365.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 282.2 | 365 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 253.8 | 452.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 240.2 | 348 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 258.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 271.6 | 392.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 483 | 673.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 472.3 | 645.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 499.5 | 862.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 485.1 | 558.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 472.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 457.8 | 516.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 502.7 | 714.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 437.8 | 619.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 319.9 | 535.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 298 | 443.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 389.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 336.3 | 419.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 867.5 | 773.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 924.5 | 782.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 894.6 | 761.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 905.8 | 803.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 942.6 | 784 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 915.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 891.3 | 830 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 911 | 927.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 796.1 | 689.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 722.4 | 1,050.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 702.6 | 939.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 750.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 753.6 | 903.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,360.8 | 5,776.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,373 | 3,504.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,376.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,426.6 | 9,949 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,215.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,885.3 | 9,881.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,640 | 3,277.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,565.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 1,073.5 | 3,604.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 1,068 | 2,482 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 1,437.1 | 2,414.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 467.7 | 363.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 457.1 | 342 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 454.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 530.9 | 335.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 497.2 | 333.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 489.7 | 320 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 419.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 528.8 | 447.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 522.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 439.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 501.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 513.4 | 310.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 498.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 438.5 | 268.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 391.6 | 218.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 364.1 | 244 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 508.8 | 333.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 474.7 | 302.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 488.5 | 286.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 448.8 | 306.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 433.3 | 276 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 429.7 | 277.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 470 | 327.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 476.8 | 301.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 428.9 | 288.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 429.3 | 258.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 442.7 | 247.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 417 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 356.4 | 249 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | — | 1,843.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 475.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 666.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 3,321.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 251.5 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1650 | B · GeForce GTX 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | no data | GM204-200-A1 | no data for A |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 896 (CUDA cores) | 1,664 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,485 MHz | 1,050 MHz | A: 435 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,665 MHz | 1,178 MHz | A: 487 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 4 GB | 4 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | equal |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 256 bit | B: 128 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | no data | 224.4 GB/s | no data for A |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 75 W (board power) | 148 W (TDP) | not directly comparable |
| Recommended PSU | 300 W | no data | no data for B |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 | no data | no data for B |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | 130 mm | no data | no data for B |
| Thickness (slots) | 2 | no data | no data for B |
| Power connectors (reference) | 1x 6-pin | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
Ano data
BGM204-200-A1
no data for AArchitecture
ATuring
BMaxwell
differsShader units
A896 (CUDA cores)
B1,664 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,485 MHz
B1,050 MHz
A: 435 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,665 MHz
B1,178 MHz
A: 487 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A4 GB
B4 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR5
BGDDR5
equalMemory bus
A128 bit
B256 bit
B: 128 bit moreMemory bandwidth
Ano data
B224.4 GB/s
no data for AExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A75 W (board power)
B148 W (TDP)
not directly comparableTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A300 W
Bno data
no data for BInterface
APCIe 3.0
Bno data
no data for BLength (reference / Founders Edition)
A130 mm
Bno data
no data for BPartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A2
Bno data
no data for BPower connectors (reference)
A1x 6-pin
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650: 4 GB GDDR5, 128-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970: 4 GB GDDR5, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970?
It depends on the task: rendering and compute: results disagree.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650checked November 7, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.