GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
In the available comparable benchmarks the difference is below the noticeable threshold, so no significant advantage was found.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
≈ parityThe difference in available benchmarks is below the noticeable threshold, so there is no significant advantage.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is better2
Video memory 2 GB more6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory bus 64 bit more192 bit vs 128 bit
Where GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- 3.7% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB130.9 sGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER126.2 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 126A · 1310100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 3.7% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
130.9 s · community measurement, sample 38 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 38 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 130.03–131.67; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
126.2 s · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 124.97–128.98; submissions 2021-07-17 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Reference results (93)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 150.8 | 139.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 156.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 154.3 | 153 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 158.8 | 99.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 163.9 | 100.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 519.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 528 | 458.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 473.5 | 403.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 583.9 | 359.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 613.1 | 367.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 305.7 | 288.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 304.2 | 255.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 318.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 321.2 | 181.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 530.6 | 418.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 529.8 | 386.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 479.8 | 239.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 368 | 217.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 866.6 | 830.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 797.5 | 703.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 895.1 | 545.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,599.7 | 1,510.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,242.1 | 2,780.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 1,279.1 | 890.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 382.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 454 | 560 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 456.1 | 622.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 429.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 471.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 366.4 | 556.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 360.7 | 554.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 283.7 | 478.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 316.2 | 462.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 445.9 | 645.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 392.8 | 580.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 388.5 | 542.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 383.3 | 560.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 392.5 | 562.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 388.2 | 452.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 391.2 | 603.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 390.9 | 577.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 370.1 | 526.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 368.4 | 564.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 359.7 | 540 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 360.5 | 540.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 294.6 | 472.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 308.2 | 521.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | — | 1,216.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 137.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 142 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 141.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 155.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 151.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 96.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 94.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 638.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 453.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 438 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 432.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 457.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 456.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 340.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 430.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 243.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 256.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 260.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 279.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 263.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 180.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 704.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 391.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 391.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 418.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 436.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 405.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 218.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 1,367.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 782.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 791.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 795.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 859.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 803.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 528.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 546.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 2,390.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 1,927.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 2,197.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 1,909.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 1,483 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 759.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 516.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 550.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 604.7 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | B · GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | no data | TU116-250-KA-A1 | no data for A |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 1,280 (CUDA cores) | 1,280 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,506 MHz | 1,530 MHz | B: 24 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,708 MHz | 1,725 MHz | B: 17 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 6 GB | 4 GB | A: 2 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 192 bit | 128 bit | A: 64 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 192 GB/s | 192 GB/s | equal |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 120 W (board power) | 100 W (TDP) | not directly comparable |
| Recommended PSU | 400 W | no data | no data for B |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 | no data | no data for B |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | 250 mm | no data | no data for B |
| Thickness (slots) | 2 | no data | no data for B |
| Power connectors (reference) | 1x 6-pin | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
Ano data
BTU116-250-KA-A1
no data for AArchitecture
APascal
BTuring
differsShader units
A1,280 (CUDA cores)
B1,280 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,506 MHz
B1,530 MHz
B: 24 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,708 MHz
B1,725 MHz
B: 17 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A6 GB
B4 GB
A: 2 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR5
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A192 bit
B128 bit
A: 64 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A192 GB/s
B192 GB/s
equalExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A120 W (board power)
B100 W (TDP)
not directly comparableTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A400 W
Bno data
no data for BInterface
APCIe 3.0
Bno data
no data for BLength (reference / Founders Edition)
A250 mm
Bno data
no data for BPartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A2
Bno data
no data for BPower connectors (reference)
A1x 6-pin
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB: 6 GB GDDR5, 192-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: 4 GB GDDR6, 128-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
In the available comparable benchmarks the difference is below the noticeable threshold, so no significant advantage was found.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBchecked November 7, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.