NVIDIA · Turing
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: specs, benchmarks and comparison
- 4 GB GDDR6
- 100 W
- Launch price
- $159
- MSRP, US
- Release
- November 22, 2019
Performance
Rank among models tested in the same benchmark on the same render backend.
Blender Benchmark 2.81a
GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA)
1,216.16 s
lower is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA)
126.23 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 25GeForce GTX 107090
- 26GeForce GTX 970114
- 27GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER126
- 28GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB131
- 29GeForce GTX 1650134
Median of 24 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 152.98 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 151.52 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 155.3 s | 22 of 27 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 141.23 s | 16 of 20 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 142.03 s | 18 of 23 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 139.2 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 137.66 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX)
100.46 s
lower is better
Median of 10 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (3)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 99.37 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 94.59 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 96.45 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (CUDA)
457.92 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 19GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q353
- 20GeForce GTX 1070365
- 21GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER458
- 22GeForce GTX 970482
- 23GeForce GTX 1650541
Median of 27 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 403.89 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 458.26 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 456.65 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 432.87 s | 16 of 18 |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 437.99 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 638.34 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 453.81 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX)
367.24 s
lower is better
Median of 9 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 359.31 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 340.69 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA)
279.77 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 18GeForce GTX 1660201
- 19GeForce GTX 1070217
- 20GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER280
- 21GeForce GTX 1650302
- 22GeForce GTX 1050 Ti514
Median of 24 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 255.41 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 288.27 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 263.52 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 260.54 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 256.63 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 430.93 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 243.06 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX)
181.94 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 180.91 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, koro (CUDA)
436.34 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 18GeForce GTX 1070360
- 19GeForce GTX 980 Ti368
- 20GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER436
- 21GeForce GTX 1650485
- 22GeForce GTX 1050 Ti760
Median of 24 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 386.36 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 418.15 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 405.64 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 418.32 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 391.2 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 704.25 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 391.42 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX)
217.78 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 239.16 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 218.9 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA)
859.47 s
lower is better
Nearest models in this benchmark
- 19GeForce GTX 1070604
- 20GeForce GTX 1660607
- 21GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER859
- 22GeForce GTX 1650943
- 23GeForce GTX 1050 Ti1,342
Median of 22 runs · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (7)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 | 703.33 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 830.22 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 803.28 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 795.76 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 791.54 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 1,367.52 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81a | 782.06 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX)
545.27 s
lower is better
Median of 4 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (2)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 546.52 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 528.3 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA)
2,780.51 s
lower is better
Median of 7 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (6)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92 | 1,510.91 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2 | 1,483.01 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 1,909.23 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83 | 2,197.91 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82 | 1,927.56 s · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81 | 2,390.38 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX)
890.61 s
lower is better
Median of 2 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (1)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90 | 759.46 s · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA)
605 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 1 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (4)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 623 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 560 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 550 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 516 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX)
555 samples/min
higher is better
Median of 19 runs · small sample · Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) · November 14, 2026
Other benchmark versions (17)
| Benchmark | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0 | 463 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1 | 478 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0 | 521 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0 | 472 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0 | 541 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0 | 540 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0 | 557 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0 | 564 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0 | 526 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0 | 577 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 | 603 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 | 453 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 | 563 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1 | 561 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0 | 543 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 | 580 samples/min · small sample | — |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1 | 645 samples/min · small sample | — |
Each benchmark version has its own scale; results from different versions are not compared.
Specifications
Reference values for the chip. Clocks, length and connectors depend on the card model.
Chip
- GPU chip
- TU116-250-KA-A1
- Architecture
- Turing
- Shader units
- 1,280 (CUDA cores)
Clocks
- Base clock
- 1,530 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1,725 MHz
Memory
- Video memory
- 4 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR6
- Memory bus
- 128 bit
- Memory bandwidth
- 192 GB/s
Power and dimensions
- Board power
- 100 W (TDP)
Specifications: Wikipedia (English), checked November 14, 2026. Release date and launch price: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Will it fit your system
Checks the power supply, case length and PCIe slot.
- Needs checkingPower supply. The manufacturer did not list a recommended PSU wattage (or it is not in the database).
- Needs checkingCard length and case. Length depends on the specific partner model (ASUS, MSI, Palit and others), so pick the exact SKU.
- Needs checkingPCIe interface. The card’s PCIe version is unknown.