Skip to content
RU

Core i7-13700K vs Ryzen 9 5950X: specs and benchmark comparison

AIntel · Raptor Lake

Intel Core i7-13700K

  • 16 cores / 24 threads
  • up to 5.4 GHz
  • LGA1700

October 20, 2022 · $409 at launch

BAMD · Zen 3

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

  • 16 cores / 32 threads
  • up to 4.9 GHz
  • AM4

November 5, 2020 · $799 at launch

Short verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Core i7-13700KRyzen 9 5950X →
  • Multi-thread performance

    B +8.2%

    AMD Ryzen 9 5950X leads in this scenario (up to 8.2% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Core i7-13700K is better3

  • L2 cache 16 MB more24 MB vs 8 MB

  • Official memory speed 2,400 MT/s more5,600 MT/s vs 3,200 MT/s

  • Launch price $390 lower$409 vs $799

Where Ryzen 9 5950X is better2

  • Threads 8 more32 vs 24

  • L3 cache 34 MB more64 MB vs 30 MB

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    0.4% difference, within the threshold

    Position among tested models (89)

    A · 392B · 394
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    The 0.4% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).

    About the measurement and source
    A · Intel Core i7-13700K

    391.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 101 submissions (21 outliers excluded), interquartile range 369.41–401.98; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-04-05; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

    393.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 475 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 475 submissions (16 outliers excluded), interquartile range 364.73–428.6; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-10-15; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (10)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom378.7377.3A +0.4%
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom384.5416B +8.2%
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom445.9430.8A +3.5%
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom414.2410A +1%
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom412.8398A +3.7%
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom397.1408.8B +3%
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom388.5386.8A +0.4%
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom382.7403.3B +5.4%
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom356.7375.3B +5.2%
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom368.4376.4B +2.2%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (31)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom399413.6reference
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom422.1406.1reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom387.8383.6reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom386.8404.4reference
Blender Benchmark 2.81CPU, bmw27 (CPU)—72no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aCPU, bmw27 (CPU)—75.4no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, bmw27 (CPU)—82.6no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, bmw27 (CPU)—77.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, bmw27 (CPU)—85.6no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, bmw27 (CPU)—98.9no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, classroom (CPU)—243.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, classroom (CPU)—210.8no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, classroom (CPU)—216.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, classroom (CPU)—251.4no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, fishy_cat (CPU)—118.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, fishy_cat (CPU)—100.8no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, fishy_cat (CPU)—108no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, koro (CPU)—156no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, koro (CPU)—133.7no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, koro (CPU)—160.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU)—257.2no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU)—226.5no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU)—225.3no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, victor (CPU)—445.7no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, victor (CPU)—416.7no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, victor (CPU)—363.6no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—475.4no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—453.4no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—428.1no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—393.8no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom—413.9no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A16 (8P + 8E)

    B16

    equal

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    A24

    B32

    B: 8 more
  • Base clock

    A3.4 GHz

    B3.4 GHz

    equal

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    A5.4 GHz

    B4.9 GHz

    A: 0.5 GHz more
  • Unlocked multiplier

    Ano data

    Byes

    no data for A

Cache

  • L2 cache

    A24 MB

    B8 MB

    A: 16 MB more
  • L3 cache

    A30 MB

    B64 MB

    B: 34 MB more

Platform

  • Socket

    ALGA1700

    BAM4

    differs
  • Process node

    AIntel 7

    BTSMC 7 nm FinFET

    differs

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    ADDR4, DDR5

    BDDR4

    differs
  • Memory channels

    A2

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Official memory speed

    A5,600 MT/s

    B3,200 MT/s

    A: 2,400 MT/s more

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    A192 GB

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • PCI Express

    APCIe 5.0 and 4.0, 20 lanes

    BPCIe 4.0

    differs
  • Integrated graphics

    AIntel UHD Graphics 770

    Bnone

    differs

Power

  • TDP (AMD method)

    Ano data

    B105 W

    no data for A

    AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.

  • Processor Base Power (Intel)

    A125 W

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Maximum Turbo Power (Intel)

    A253 W

    Bno data

    no data for B

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Platform compatibility

  • Socket Incompatible

    Intel Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700, AMD Ryzen 9 5950X uses AM4. The CPUs are not interchangeable: switching requires a different motherboard.

  • Memory Needs checking

    Both controllers support DDR4. The motherboard determines the memory type, so check its specification.

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X fit the same motherboard?

No: Intel Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X uses AM4.

How many cores and threads do Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X have?

Intel Core i7-13700K: 16 cores / 24 threads. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: 16 cores / 32 threads (manufacturer data).

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

Intel Core i7-13700K: Intel UHD Graphics 770. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: no.

Which is faster: Intel Core i7-13700K or AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (4)
  • Intel — specifications of Intel Core i7-13700Kchecked November 7, 2026
  • AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 9 5950Xchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
  • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK