Skip to content
RU

Ryzen 9 5950X vs Ryzen 9 7950X: specs and benchmark comparison

AAMD · Zen 3

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

  • 16 cores / 32 threads
  • up to 4.9 GHz
  • AM4

November 5, 2020 · $799 at launch

BAMD · Zen 4

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

  • 16 cores / 32 threads
  • up to 5.7 GHz
  • AM5

September 27, 2022 · $699 at launch

Short verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Ryzen 9 5950XRyzen 9 7950X →
  • Multi-thread performance

    B +45.4%

    AMD Ryzen 9 7950X leads in this scenario (up to 45.4% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: single-thread performance, gaming (cpu-bound scenarios), power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Ryzen 9 5950X is better1

  • TDP (AMD method) 65 W lower105 W vs 170 W

Where Ryzen 9 7950X is better4

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 40.1% faster551 samples/min vs 394 samples/min

  • L2 cache 8 MB more16 MB vs 8 MB

  • Official memory speed 2,000 MT/s more5,200 MT/s vs 3,200 MT/s

  • Launch price $100 lower$699 vs $799

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom · samples/min, higher is better

    B ahead by 40.1%

    Position among tested models (89)

    A · 394B · 551
    0200400600800
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is ahead by 40.1% in this benchmark.

    About the measurement and source
    A · AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

    393.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 475 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 475 submissions (16 outliers excluded), interquartile range 364.73–428.6; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-10-15; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

    551.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 232 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 232 submissions (14 outliers excluded), interquartile range 529.77–587.25; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-03-08; CPU backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (13)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom377.3527.9B +39.9%
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom413.6585.5B +41.6%
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom416575.3B +38.3%
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom406.1576.1B +41.9%
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom430.8619.7B +43.9%
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom410588.8B +43.6%
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom398566.9B +42.4%
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom408.8569.1B +39.2%
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom386.8550.1B +42.2%
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom403.3551.9B +36.9%
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom375.3522.4B +39.2%
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom376.4535B +42.1%
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom404.4588B +45.4%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (28)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 2.81CPU, bmw27 (CPU)72—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.81aCPU, bmw27 (CPU)75.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, bmw27 (CPU)82.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, bmw27 (CPU)77.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, bmw27 (CPU)85.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, bmw27 (CPU)98.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, classroom (CPU)243.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, classroom (CPU)210.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, classroom (CPU)216.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90.1CPU, classroom (CPU)251.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, fishy_cat (CPU)118.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, fishy_cat (CPU)100.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, fishy_cat (CPU)108—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, koro (CPU)156—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, koro (CPU)133.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, koro (CPU)160.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU)257.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU)226.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, pavillon_barcelona (CPU)225.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.82CPU, victor (CPU)445.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.83CPU, victor (CPU)416.7—no pair
Blender Benchmark 2.90CPU, victor (CPU)363.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom475.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom453.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.2CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom428.1—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom393.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom383.6518reference
Blender Benchmark 5.3.0CPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom413.9570.5reference

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Cores and clocks

  • Cores

    A16

    B16

    equal

    Cores of different types may differ in performance.

  • Threads

    A32

    B32

    equal
  • Base clock

    A3.4 GHz

    B4.5 GHz

    B: 1.1 GHz more

    For hybrid Intel CPUs, the P-core base clock is shown.

  • Max clock (Boost/Turbo)

    A4.9 GHz

    B5.7 GHz

    B: 0.8 GHz more
  • Unlocked multiplier

    Ayes

    Byes

    equal

Cache

  • L1 cache

    Ano data

    B1,024 KB

    no data for A
  • L2 cache

    A8 MB

    B16 MB

    B: 8 MB more
  • L3 cache

    A64 MB

    B64 MB

    equal

Platform

  • Socket

    AAM4

    BAM5

    differs
  • Process node

    ATSMC 7 nm FinFET

    BTSMC 5 nm FinFET

    differs

Memory and interfaces

  • Memory type

    ADDR4

    BDDR5

    differs
  • Memory channels

    Ano data

    B2

    no data for A
  • Official memory speed

    A3,200 MT/s

    B5,200 MT/s

    B: 2,000 MT/s more

    For controllers that support two generations, the speed for the newer memory type is shown.

  • Max memory capacity

    Ano data

    B128 GB

    no data for A
  • PCI Express

    APCIe 4.0

    BPCIe 5.0, 24 lanes

    differs
  • Integrated graphics

    Anone

    BAMD Radeon Graphics (2 CU)

    differs

Power

  • TDP (AMD method)

    A105 W

    B170 W

    B: 65 W higher

    AMD TDP, AMD PPT, Intel Base Power (PL1) and Max Turbo Power (PL2) are different metrics and are not compared with each other. For laptop CPUs, the laptop maker configures the TDP.

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Platform compatibility

  • Socket Incompatible

    AMD Ryzen 9 5950X uses AM4, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X uses AM5. The CPUs are not interchangeable: switching requires a different motherboard.

  • Memory Incompatible

    AMD Ryzen 9 5950X supports DDR4, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X supports DDR5. Memory modules cannot be reused.

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

Do AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X fit the same motherboard?

No: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X uses AM4, while AMD Ryzen 9 7950X uses AM5.

How many cores and threads do AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X have?

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: 16 cores / 32 threads. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: 16 cores / 32 threads (manufacturer data).

Do these CPUs have integrated graphics?

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: no. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: AMD Radeon Graphics (2 CU).

Which is faster: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X or AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: multi-thread performance. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (3)
  • AMD — specifications of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, specifications of AMD Ryzen 9 7950Xchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0checked November 14, 2026
  • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK