Skip to content
RU

Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Radeon RX 9070 XT: specs and benchmark comparison

AAMD · RDNA 2

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

  • 16 GB GDDR6
  • 300 W
  • PSU 850 W+

December 8, 2020 · $999 at launch

BAMD · RDNA 4

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

  • 16 GB GDDR6
  • 304 W
  • PSU 750 W+

March 6, 2025 · $599 at launch

Short verdict

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Compare with AI
← Radeon RX 6900 XTRadeon RX 9070 XT →
  • Rendering and compute

    B +25.6%

    AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT leads in this scenario (up to 25.6% in comparable benchmarks).

No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.

Advantages

Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.

Where Radeon RX 6900 XT is better2

  • Compute units 16 more80 CU vs 64 CU

  • Board power 4 W lower300 W (TBP) vs 304 W (TBP)

Where Radeon RX 9070 XT is better4

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 25.6% faster3,280 samples/min vs 2,611 samples/min

  • Memory speed 4 Gbps more20 Gbps vs 16 Gbps

  • Memory bandwidth 128 GB/s more640 GB/s vs 512 GB/s

  • Launch price $400 lower$599 vs $999

Benchmarks

Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.

  • Blender Benchmark 4.5.0

    GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better

    B ahead by 25.6%

    Position among tested models (13, HIP)

    A · 2,611B · 3,280
    02,0004,0006,000
    Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min.

    AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is ahead by 25.6% in this benchmark.

    About the measurement and source
    A · AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

    2,610.9 samples/min · community measurement, sample 47 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 47 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2592.36–2625.33; submissions 2025-07-21 to 2026-03-05; HIP backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    B · AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

    3,280.3 samples/min · community measurement, sample 666 · November 14, 2026

    Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)

    Median of 666 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 3154.63–3383.79; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-23; HIP backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.

    difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.

    Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.

Other comparable benchmarks (1)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,5493,105.7B +21.8%

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Reference results (17)
BenchmarkABDifference
Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,778.6—no pair
Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)3,137.13,580.9reference
Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,846.43,383reference
Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,263—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,179.8—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,470.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,472.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,059.9—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,667.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,695.4—no pair
Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,646.5—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,624.2—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,811.3—no pair
Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,793.33,323.5reference
Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)2,631.32,911reference
Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)3,154.33,624.4reference
Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal)—3,179.3no pair

Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.

Specifications

Chip

  • Architecture

    ARDNA 2

    BRDNA 4

    differs
  • Compute units

    A80 CU

    B64 CU

    A: 16 more

    SM (NVIDIA), CU (AMD) and Xe-core (Intel) are different units and are not compared numerically across vendors.

  • Shader units

    A5,120 (Stream processors)

    B4,096 (Stream processors)

    not directly comparable

    Shader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.

Clocks

  • Game Clock (AMD)

    A2,015 MHz

    B2,400 MHz

    B: 385 MHz more
  • Boost clock

    A2,250 MHz

    B2,970 MHz

    B: 720 MHz more

    Clocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.

Memory

  • Video memory

    A16 GB

    B16 GB

    equal
  • Memory type

    AGDDR6

    BGDDR6

    equal
  • Memory bus

    A256 bit

    B256 bit

    equal
  • Memory speed

    A16 Gbps

    B20 Gbps

    B: 4 Gbps more
  • Memory bandwidth

    A512 GB/s

    B640 GB/s

    B: 128 GB/s more

    Excludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.

Power and dimensions

  • Board power

    A300 W (TBP)

    B304 W (TBP)

    B: 4 W higher

    TGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.

  • Recommended PSU

    A850 W

    B750 W

    A: 100 W higher
  • Interface

    Ano data

    BPCIe 5.0 x16

    no data for A
  • Length (reference / Founders Edition)

    A267 mm

    Bno data

    no data for B

    Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.

  • Thickness (slots)

    A2.5

    Bno data

    no data for B
  • Power connectors (reference)

    A2x 8-pin (reference card)

    Bno data

    no data for B

“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).

Compare with AI

An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.

AI verdict

Questions and answers

How much video memory do AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT have?

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT: 16 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT: 16 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.

What power supply does the manufacturer recommend?

For AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, 850 W or more; for AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, 750 W or more. This is a recommendation for a typical system; also check the power connectors of the specific card model.

Which is faster: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT or AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT?

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.

Data sources (3)
  • AMD — specifications of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, specifications of AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTchecked November 7, 2026
  • Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0checked November 14, 2026
  • Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026

How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.

TelegramVK