GeForce RTX 3090 vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
ANVIDIA · Ampere
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- 24 GB GDDR6X
- 350 W
- PSU 750 W+
September 24, 2020 · $1,499 at launch
BNVIDIA · Ampere
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
- 24 GB GDDR6X
- 450 W
- PSU 850 W+
March 29, 2022 · $1,999 at launch
Rendering and compute
depends on the taskBenchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3090 is better2
Board power 100 W lower350 W (board power) vs 450 W (board power)
Launch price $500 lower$1,499 vs $1,999
Where GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is better1
Shader units 256 more10,752 (CUDA cores) vs 10,496 (CUDA cores)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- 3.5% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 30905,423.6 samples/minGeForce RTX 3090 Ti5,611.6 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 5,424B · 5,61205,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. The 3.5% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
5,423.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 596 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 596 submissions (34 outliers excluded), interquartile range 5240.15–5558.47; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-10-19; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
5,611.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 133 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 133 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 5039.69–5780.09; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (11)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,354.8 | 5,774.1 | B +7.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 6,560.4 | 5,992.8 | A +9.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,625.7 | 6,067.1 | B +7.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 6,018.2 | 6,298.2 | B +4.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 6,014.6 | 6,514.9 | B +8.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 6,296.9 | 6,644.1 | B +5.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 6,305.5 | 6,585.8 | B +4.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,536.1 | 5,383.1 | A +2.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,536.4 | 5,853.8 | B +5.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,347.6 | 5,629.2 | B +5.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,333 | 5,695.1 | B +6.8% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (81)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 21.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 20.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 18.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 18.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 16.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 8.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 8.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 9.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 9.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 9.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 70.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 67.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 58.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 55.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 79.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 35.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 38.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 37.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 34.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 33.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 39 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 37.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 33.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 34.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 34.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 16.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 16.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 16.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 18.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 17.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 58 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 57.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 57.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 58 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 54.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 36.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 37.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 36.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 57.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 37.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 119.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 108.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 108.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 109.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 99.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 45.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 46.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 46.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 45.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 45.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 159.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 148.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 124.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 178.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 138.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 52.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 57.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 53.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 62.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 60.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,696.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,418.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,138.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,448.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,729.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,797.9 | 4,094.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,864 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 4,060.8 | 4,561.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,724.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,735.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,699.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,730.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 3,798 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,253.3 | 5,472.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,093.8 | 5,264 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,841.8 | 5,865.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,826.5 | 5,865.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 6,566.2 | 6,112.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 4,875.8 | 4,823.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,266.1 | 4,572.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 5,143.8 | — | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3090 | B · GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 10,496 (CUDA cores) | 10,752 (CUDA cores) | B: 256 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,400 MHz | 1,560 MHz | B: 160 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,700 MHz | 1,860 MHz | B: 160 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 24 GB | 24 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X | equal |
| Memory bus | 384 bit | 384 bit | equal |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 350 W (board power) | 450 W (board power) | B: 100 W higher |
| Recommended PSU | 750 W | 850 W | B: 100 W higher |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | 313 mm | 313 mm | equal |
| Thickness (slots) | 3 | 3 | equal |
| Power connectors (reference) | 2x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE | 3x 8-pin (adapter) or 450+ W PCIe Gen 5 — FE | differs |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAmpere
equalShader units
A10,496 (CUDA cores)
B10,752 (CUDA cores)
B: 256 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,400 MHz
B1,560 MHz
B: 160 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,700 MHz
B1,860 MHz
B: 160 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A24 GB
B24 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6X
BGDDR6X
equalMemory bus
A384 bit
B384 bit
equal
Power and dimensions
Board power
A350 W (board power)
B450 W (board power)
B: 100 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A750 W
B850 W
B: 100 W higherLength (reference / Founders Edition)
A313 mm
B313 mm
equalPartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A3
B3
equalPower connectors (reference)
A2x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE
B3x 8-pin (adapter) or 450+ W PCIe Gen 5 — FE
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090: 24 GB GDDR6X, 384-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti: 24 GB GDDR6X, 384-bit bus.
What power supply does the manufacturer recommend?
For NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, 750 W or more; for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, 850 W or more. This is a recommendation for a typical system; also check the power connectors of the specific card model.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti?
It depends on the task: rendering and compute: results disagree.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Tichecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.