GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
BNVIDIA · Ampere
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- 12 GB GDDR6X
- 350 W
- PSU 750 W+
June 3, 2021 · $1,199 at launch
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +87.4%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 87.4% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is better15
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 62.8% lower17 s vs 28 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 69.7% lower10 s vs 16 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 59.8% lower80 s vs 128 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 63.8% lower34 s vs 56 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 75.5% lower35 s vs 61 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 83.8% lower18 s vs 34 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 79.6% lower56 s vs 100 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 84.3% lower39 s vs 72 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 70.5% lower101 s vs 172 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 63% lower46 s vs 75 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 73.9% lower141 s vs 245 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 72.8% lower61 s vs 106 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 84.1% faster5,344 samples/min vs 2,903 samples/min
Shader units 4,096 more10,240 (CUDA cores) vs 6,144 (CUDA cores)
Memory bus 128 bit more384 bit vs 256 bit
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- B ahead by 62.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU27.8 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti17.1 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 17A · 280100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 62.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
27.8 s · community measurement, sample 73 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 73 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 26.49–31.28; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-17; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
17.1 s · community measurement, sample 241 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 241 submissions (32 outliers excluded), interquartile range 16.92–17.32; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 69.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU16.2 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti9.6 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 10A · 16050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 69.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
16.2 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 15.92–18.21; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
9.6 s · community measurement, sample 107 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 107 submissions (20 outliers excluded), interquartile range 9.49–9.69; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 59.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU127.9 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti80.1 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 80A · 1280200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 59.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
127.9 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 118.87–142.98; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-17; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
80.1 s · community measurement, sample 215 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 215 submissions (24 outliers excluded), interquartile range 78.67–81.45; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 63.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU55.8 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti34 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 34A · 56050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 63.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 53.28–60.77; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
34 s · community measurement, sample 121 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 121 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 33.4–35; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 75.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU61.2 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti34.9 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 35A · 610100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 75.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
61.2 s · community measurement, sample 57 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 57 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.69–68.24; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-17; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
34.9 s · community measurement, sample 187 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 187 submissions (23 outliers excluded), interquartile range 34.38–35.32; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 83.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU33.8 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti18.4 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 18A · 34020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 83.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
33.8 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.83–36.65; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
18.4 s · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 18.07–18.76; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 79.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU100.2 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti55.8 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 56A · 1000200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 79.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100.2 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 93.87–111.03; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-14; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
55.8 s · community measurement, sample 180 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 180 submissions (27 outliers excluded), interquartile range 55.15–56.53; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 84.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU71.8 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti39 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 39A · 72050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 84.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
71.8 s · community measurement, sample 64 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 64 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 69.49–75.41; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
39 s · community measurement, sample 104 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 104 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 38.18–40.26; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 70.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU171.9 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti100.9 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 101A · 1720200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 70.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
171.9 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 158.37–189.91; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-18; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
100.9 s · community measurement, sample 191 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 191 submissions (27 outliers excluded), interquartile range 99.62–102.43; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 63%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU74.8 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti45.9 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 46A · 750100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 63% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
74.8 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 73.23–83.08; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
45.9 s · community measurement, sample 105 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 105 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 45.17–46.74; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 73.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU244.5 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti140.6 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 141A · 24502505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 73.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
244.5 s · community measurement, sample 59 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 59 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 229.05–270.05; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-14; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
140.6 s · community measurement, sample 180 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 180 submissions (24 outliers excluded), interquartile range 138.92–142.91; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 72.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU106.2 sGeForce RTX 3080 Ti61.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 61A · 1060100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 72.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
106.2 s · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 103.1–112.74; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
61.5 s · community measurement, sample 105 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 105 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 60.16–63.3; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 84.1%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU2,903 samples/minGeForce RTX 3080 Ti5,343.7 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,903B · 5,34405,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ahead by 84.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2,903 samples/min · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2826.16–3093.58; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-03-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
5,343.7 samples/min · community measurement, sample 193 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 193 submissions (16 outliers excluded), interquartile range 5163.7–5447.58; submissions 2025-07-20 to 2026-11-12; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (13)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 16.9 | 9 | B +87.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,896.3 | 5,223.7 | B +80.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,749.2 | 5,075.2 | B +84.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,484.9 | 5,557.8 | B +59.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,366.6 | 5,532.4 | B +64.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,501.2 | 5,968 | B +70.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,431.4 | 5,912.4 | B +72.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,661.2 | 6,205.2 | B +69.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,353.3 | 6,095.3 | B +81.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,245.3 | 5,440.2 | B +67.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,222.4 | 5,521.3 | B +71.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,039.6 | 5,327.6 | B +75.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,914.3 | 5,276 | B +81% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (45)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 37.6 | 20.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 28.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 29.7 | 19 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 16.1 | 9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 15.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 153.1 | 70.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 92.6 | 56.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 61.2 | 33.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 56.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 60.3 | 35.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 73.1 | 37.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 53.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 60.8 | 35.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 34.2 | 17 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 30.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 37.5 | 18.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 114.2 | 59.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 104.3 | 59.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 75.4 | 37.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 68 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 120.9 | 40 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 213.1 | 107.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 192.5 | 112.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 84.1 | 44.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 74 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 83.2 | 44.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 298.2 | 142.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 290.7 | 183.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 98.9 | 51.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 86.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 124.7 | 60.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,050.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,014.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 557.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,018.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,785 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,890.6 | 3,676.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,746.4 | 4,963.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,401.4 | 5,721.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,508.4 | 5,512.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,970.5 | 4,612 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,234.9 | 5,111.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 3,559.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,942.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 4,626.7 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | B · GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 6,144 (CUDA cores) | 10,240 (CUDA cores) | B: 4,096 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | no data | 1,370 MHz | no data for A |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,245–1,710 MHz | 1,670 MHz | not directly comparable |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | no data | 12 GB | no data for A |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 384 bit | B: 128 bit more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | no data | 350 W (board power) | no data for A |
| Recommended PSU | no data | 750 W | no data for A |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | no data | 285 mm | no data for A |
| Thickness (slots) | no data | 2 | no data for A |
| Power connectors (reference) | no data | 2x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE | no data for A |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAmpere
equalShader units
A6,144 (CUDA cores)
B10,240 (CUDA cores)
B: 4,096 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
Ano data
B1,370 MHz
no data for ABoost clock
A1,245–1,710 MHz
B1,670 MHz
not directly comparableClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
Ano data
B12 GB
no data for AMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6X
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B384 bit
B: 128 bit more
Power and dimensions
Board power
Ano data
B350 W (board power)
no data for ATGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
Ano data
B750 W
no data for ALength (reference / Founders Edition)
Ano data
B285 mm
no data for APartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
Ano data
B2
no data for APower connectors (reference)
Ano data
B2x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE
no data for A
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Tichecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.