GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +13.6%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 13.6% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3070 is better2
Board power 70 W lower220 W (board power) vs 290 W (board power)
Launch price $100 lower$499 vs $599
Where GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is better10
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 10.7% lower15 s vs 16 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 7.3% lower50 s vs 53 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 5% lower53 s vs 56 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 9.2% lower30 s vs 33 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 6% lower63 s vs 67 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 8.8% lower68 s vs 74 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 5.4% lower215 s vs 226 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 9% lower93 s vs 102 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 9.9% faster3,514 samples/min vs 3,198 samples/min
Shader units 256 more6,144 (CUDA cores) vs 5,888 (CUDA cores)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- 4.9% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307026.5 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti25.3 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 25A · 270100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 4.9% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
26.5 s · community measurement, sample 151 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 151 submissions (37 outliers excluded), interquartile range 26.29–26.91; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
25.3 s · community measurement, sample 90 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 90 submissions (19 outliers excluded), interquartile range 25.14–25.68; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 10.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307016.4 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti14.8 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 15A · 16050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is ahead by 10.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
16.4 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 16.23–16.71; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
14.8 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 14.72–15.04; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 3.2% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3070114.1 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti110.6 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 111A · 1140200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 3.2% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
114.1 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (26 outliers excluded), interquartile range 113.03–116.56; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
110.6 s · community measurement, sample 73 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 73 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 108.88–111.47; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 7.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307053.4 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti49.8 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 50A · 53050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is ahead by 7.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
53.4 s · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 52.53–54.52; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
49.8 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 49.1–50.9; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307056 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti53.4 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 53A · 560100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is ahead by 5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
56 s · community measurement, sample 112 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 112 submissions (23 outliers excluded), interquartile range 55.47–57.13; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
53.4 s · community measurement, sample 65 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 65 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 52.81–54.09; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 9.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307032.6 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti29.9 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 30A · 33020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is ahead by 9.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
32.6 s · community measurement, sample 87 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 87 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.13–33.58; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
29.9 s · community measurement, sample 32 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 32 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 29.51–30.21; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-14; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 4.8% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307092.7 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti88.4 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 88A · 930200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 4.8% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
92.7 s · community measurement, sample 110 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 110 submissions (23 outliers excluded), interquartile range 91.73–94.24; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
88.4 s · community measurement, sample 60 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 60 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 87.85–89.37; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307067 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti63.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 63A · 67050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is ahead by 6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
67 s · community measurement, sample 78 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 78 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 65.96–68.84; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
63.2 s · community measurement, sample 34 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 34 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 62.36–64.49; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-14; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 3.8% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3070154.3 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti148.7 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 149A · 1540200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 3.8% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
154.3 s · community measurement, sample 109 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 109 submissions (24 outliers excluded), interquartile range 152.83–157.43; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
148.7 s · community measurement, sample 60 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 60 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 147.41–150.7; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 8.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 307074.4 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti68.4 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 68A · 740100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is ahead by 8.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
74.4 s · community measurement, sample 84 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 84 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 73.58–75.64; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
68.4 s · community measurement, sample 37 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 37 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 67.81–69.84; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 5.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3070226.4 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti214.7 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 215A · 22602505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is ahead by 5.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
226.4 s · community measurement, sample 109 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 109 submissions (20 outliers excluded), interquartile range 223.23–229.38; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
214.7 s · community measurement, sample 52 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 52 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 213.55–217.22; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3070101.7 sGeForce RTX 3070 Ti93.4 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 93A · 1020100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is ahead by 9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
101.7 s · community measurement, sample 85 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 85 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 99.6–104.68; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
93.4 s · community measurement, sample 35 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 35 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 92.93–96.09; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-21; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 9.9%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 30703,198.3 samples/minGeForce RTX 3070 Ti3,514.2 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 3,198B · 3,51405,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is ahead by 9.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
3,198.3 samples/min · community measurement, sample 296 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 296 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 3085.66–3284.94; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-09-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
3,514.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 109 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 109 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 3371.91–3561.39; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-11-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (15)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,148.8 | 3,488.7 | B +10.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,087.8 | 3,286.8 | B +6.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,988.9 | 3,395.4 | B +13.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,536.1 | 3,849.2 | B +8.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,427 | 3,793 | B +10.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,363.8 | 3,805.6 | B +13.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,406.1 | 3,795.9 | B +11.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,542 | 3,888.7 | B +9.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,590.7 | 3,891.1 | B +8.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,774.5 | 4,130.4 | B +9.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,710.9 | 4,100.2 | B +10.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,257.7 | 3,599.4 | B +10.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,285.4 | 3,624.6 | B +10.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,136 | 3,495.5 | B +11.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,162.6 | 3,501.2 | B +10.7% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (66)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 34 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 31.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 28.6 | 28.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 28.9 | 27.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 15.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 16 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 15.7 | 13.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 15.5 | 14 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 111.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 111.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 82.9 | 81.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 82.2 | 79.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 52.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 54.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 53.6 | 48.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 52.8 | 48.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 61.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 57.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 53.7 | 52.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 55.3 | 53.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 29.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 30.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 29.9 | 27 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 33.4 | 29.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 95.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 89.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 94.3 | 92 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 95.6 | 92.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 64.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 66.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 63.6 | 60.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 99.6 | 64.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 188.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 169.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 167.7 | 164.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 168.6 | 164.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 72.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 75.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 73.8 | 66.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 72.9 | 65.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 247.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 232.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 200.6 | 195.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 264.4 | 259.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 84.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 88.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 84.8 | 77.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 107.1 | 93.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,148.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,016.7 | 2,299.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,067.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,151.9 | 2,039.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,162.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,063.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,342.2 | 2,605 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,153 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,900.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,015.4 | 2,339.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,055.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,793.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,991.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,376.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,909.7 | 3,076.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,166.4 | 3,325.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,573.3 | 3,665.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,102.2 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3070 | B · GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 5,888 (CUDA cores) | 6,144 (CUDA cores) | B: 256 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,500 MHz | 1,580 MHz | B: 80 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,730 MHz | 1,770 MHz | B: 40 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 220 W (board power) | 290 W (board power) | B: 70 W higher |
| Recommended PSU | 650 W | 750 W | B: 100 W higher |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | 242 mm | 267 mm | B: 25 mm higher |
| Thickness (slots) | 2 | 2 | equal |
| Power connectors (reference) | 1x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE | 2x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE | differs |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAmpere
equalShader units
A5,888 (CUDA cores)
B6,144 (CUDA cores)
B: 256 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,500 MHz
B1,580 MHz
B: 80 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,730 MHz
B1,770 MHz
B: 40 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6X
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equal
Power and dimensions
Board power
A220 W (board power)
B290 W (board power)
B: 70 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A650 W
B750 W
B: 100 W higherLength (reference / Founders Edition)
A242 mm
B267 mm
B: 25 mm higherPartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
A2
B2
equalPower connectors (reference)
A1x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE
B2x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE
differs
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti: 8 GB GDDR6X, 256-bit bus.
What power supply does the manufacturer recommend?
For NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 650 W or more; for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, 750 W or more. This is a recommendation for a typical system; also check the power connectors of the specific card model.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Tichecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.