GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: specs and benchmark comparison
ANVIDIA · Ampere
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 8 GB GDDR6 / GDDR6X
- 200 W
- PSU 600 W+
December 2, 2020 · $399 at launch
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +17.9%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU leads in this scenario (up to 17.9% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is better13
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 7.7% lower28 s vs 30 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 13.3% lower16 s vs 18 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 6.8% lower128 s vs 137 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 10.9% lower56 s vs 62 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 7.9% lower61 s vs 66 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 15.8% lower34 s vs 39 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 10% lower100 s vs 110 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 15% lower72 s vs 83 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 8.3% lower172 s vs 186 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 17.9% lower75 s vs 88 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 14.5% lower245 s vs 280 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 15.8% lower106 s vs 123 s
Shader units 1,280 more6,144 (CUDA cores) vs 4,864 (CUDA cores)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- B ahead by 7.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti29.9 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU27.8 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 28A · 300100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 7.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
29.9 s · community measurement, sample 166 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 166 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.42–31.22; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
27.8 s · community measurement, sample 73 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 73 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 26.49–31.28; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-17; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 13.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti18.4 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU16.2 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 16A · 18050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 13.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
18.4 s · community measurement, sample 129 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 129 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 17.36–19.16; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
16.2 s · community measurement, sample 81 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 81 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 15.92–18.21; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 6.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti136.6 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU127.9 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 128A · 1370200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 6.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
136.6 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 131.88–139.28; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
127.9 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 118.87–142.98; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-17; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 10.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti61.9 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU55.8 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 56A · 62050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 10.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
61.9 s · community measurement, sample 136 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 136 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.86–64.03; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 53.28–60.77; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 7.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti66 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU61.2 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 61A · 660100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 7.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
66 s · community measurement, sample 106 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 106 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.19–67.57; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
61.2 s · community measurement, sample 57 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 57 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.69–68.24; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-17; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 15.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti39.1 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU33.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 34A · 39020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 15.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
39.1 s · community measurement, sample 79 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 79 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 38.5–40.04; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
33.8 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.83–36.65; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 10%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti110.3 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU100.2 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 100A · 1100200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 10% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
110.3 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 104.92–112.64; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100.2 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 93.87–111.03; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-14; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 15%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti82.6 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU71.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 72A · 83050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 15% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
82.6 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.89–84.17; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
71.8 s · community measurement, sample 64 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 64 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 69.49–75.41; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 8.3%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti186.3 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU171.9 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 172A · 1860200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 8.3% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
186.3 s · community measurement, sample 100 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 100 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 176.76–190.09; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
171.9 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 158.37–189.91; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-18; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 17.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti88.2 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU74.8 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 75A · 880100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 17.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
88.2 s · community measurement, sample 85 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 85 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 85.07–89.99; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
74.8 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 73.23–83.08; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 14.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti280.1 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU244.5 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 245A · 28002505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 14.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
280.1 s · community measurement, sample 96 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 96 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 262.62–285.08; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
244.5 s · community measurement, sample 59 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 59 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 229.05–270.05; submissions 2021-07-29 to 2022-02-14; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 15.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti123 sGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU106.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 106A · 1230100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU is ahead by 15.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
123 s · community measurement, sample 75 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 121.11–125.74; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
106.2 s · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 103.1–112.74; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 4.8% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti2,768.8 samples/minGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU2,903 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,769B · 2,90305,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. The 4.8% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2,768.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 223 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 223 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2671.51–2854.8; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2,903 samples/min · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2826.16–3093.58; submissions 2025-07-19 to 2026-03-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (14)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 31.4 | 29.7 | B +5.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 17.7 | 16.9 | B +4.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,724.1 | 2,896.3 | B +6.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,644.4 | 2,749.2 | B +4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,039.9 | 3,484.9 | B +14.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,010.3 | 3,366.6 | B +11.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,075.9 | 3,501.2 | B +13.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,089 | 3,431.4 | B +11.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,247.9 | 3,661.2 | B +12.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,216.7 | 3,353.3 | B +4.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,848.7 | 3,245.3 | B +13.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,908 | 3,222.4 | B +10.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,727.2 | 3,039.6 | B +11.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,733.8 | 2,914.3 | B +6.6% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (53)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 36.4 | 37.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 31.6 | 28.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 17 | 16.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 17.9 | 15.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 135.4 | 153.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 98.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 94.2 | 92.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 61.7 | 61.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 63.8 | 56.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 62.9 | 60.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 67.7 | 73.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 59.9 | 53.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 62 | 60.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 35.7 | 34.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 36.3 | 30.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 41 | 37.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 105 | 114.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 109.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 106.6 | 104.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 78.1 | 75.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 78.2 | 68 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 135 | 120.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 204.3 | 213.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 197.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 192.7 | 192.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 84.3 | 84.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 85.7 | 74 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 85.3 | 83.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 282.6 | 298.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 237.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 302.5 | 290.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 102.3 | 98.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 103 | 86.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 134.5 | 124.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,932.2 | 2,050.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,779.5 | 2,014.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,743.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,710.8 | 557.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,687.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,722.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,024.1 | 2,018.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,869 | 1,785 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,765.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,765.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,732.5 | 1,890.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,793.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,831.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,591.8 | 2,746.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,153.3 | 3,401.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,836.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,061.5 | 3,508.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,454.1 | 2,970.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,565.6 | 3,234.9 | reference |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | B · GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 4,864 (CUDA cores) | 6,144 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,280 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,410 MHz | no data | no data for B |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,670 MHz | 1,245–1,710 MHz | not directly comparable |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | no data | no data for B |
| Memory type | GDDR6 / GDDR6X | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 200 W (board power) | no data | no data for B |
| Recommended PSU | 600 W | no data | no data for B |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAmpere
equalShader units
A4,864 (CUDA cores)
B6,144 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,280 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,410 MHz
Bno data
no data for BBoost clock
A1,670 MHz
B1,245–1,710 MHz
not directly comparableClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
Bno data
no data for BMemory type
AGDDR6 / GDDR6X
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equal
Power and dimensions
Board power
A200 W (board power)
Bno data
no data for BTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A600 W
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPUchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.