GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: specs and benchmark comparison
ANVIDIA · Ampere
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 8 GB GDDR6 / GDDR6X
- 200 W
- PSU 600 W+
December 2, 2020 · $399 at launch
Rendering and compute
depends on the taskBenchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is better4
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 6.4% lower17 s vs 18 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 6.9% lower82 s vs 88 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 7.1% lower262 s vs 280 s
Shader units 256 more5,120 (CUDA cores) vs 4,864 (CUDA cores)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- 4.2% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti29.9 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU28.7 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 29A · 300100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 4.2% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
29.9 s · community measurement, sample 166 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 166 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.42–31.22; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
28.7 s · community measurement, sample 116 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 116 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 27.25–32.03; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 6.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti18.4 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU17.3 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 17A · 18050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 6.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
18.4 s · community measurement, sample 129 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 129 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 17.36–19.16; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
17.3 s · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 16.84–19.15; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 1.7% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti136.6 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU134.3 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 134A · 1370200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 1.7% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
136.6 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 131.88–139.28; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
134.3 s · community measurement, sample 91 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 91 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 127.14–146.92; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 0.5% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti61.9 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU61.5 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 62A · 62050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 0.5% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
61.9 s · community measurement, sample 136 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 136 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.86–64.03; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.5 s · community measurement, sample 87 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 87 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 59.14–66.25; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 3.7% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti66 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU63.7 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 64A · 660100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 3.7% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
66 s · community measurement, sample 106 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 106 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.19–67.57; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
63.7 s · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 61–70.98; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 2.3% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti39.1 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU38.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 38A · 39020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 2.3% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
39.1 s · community measurement, sample 79 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 79 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 38.5–40.04; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
38.2 s · community measurement, sample 73 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 73 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 36.93–40.92; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 4.5% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti110.3 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU105.5 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 106A · 1100200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 4.5% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
110.3 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 104.92–112.64; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
105.5 s · community measurement, sample 64 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 64 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 100.91–115.04; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 0.8% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti82.6 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU81.9 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 82A · 83050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 0.8% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
82.6 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.89–84.17; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.9 s · community measurement, sample 66 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 66 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 79.76–87.28; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 4.4% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti186.3 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU178.5 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 178A · 1860200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 4.4% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
186.3 s · community measurement, sample 100 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 100 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 176.76–190.09; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
178.5 s · community measurement, sample 74 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 74 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 169.45–196.61; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 6.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti88.2 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU82.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 82A · 880100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 6.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
88.2 s · community measurement, sample 85 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 85 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 85.07–89.99; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
82.5 s · community measurement, sample 78 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 78 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.04–88.43; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 7.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti280.1 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU261.6 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 262A · 28002505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 7.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
280.1 s · community measurement, sample 96 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 96 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 262.62–285.08; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
261.6 s · community measurement, sample 66 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 66 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 249.25–285.23; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 1.2% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti123 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU121.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 122A · 1230100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 1.2% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
123 s · community measurement, sample 75 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 121.11–125.74; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
121.5 s · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 117.1–128.44; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 0.3% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti2,768.8 samples/minGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU2,760.6 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
B · 2,761A · 2,76905,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. The 0.3% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2,768.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 223 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 223 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2671.51–2854.8; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2,760.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 118 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 118 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2251.76–2939.6; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-15; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (21)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 31.4 | 30.2 | B +3.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 17.7 | 16.5 | B +7.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 94.2 | 99.7 | A +5.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 62 | 67.4 | A +8.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 106.6 | 114.7 | A +7.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 192.7 | 204.6 | A +6.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 302.5 | 324.6 | A +7.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,724.1 | 2,914.8 | B +7% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,644.4 | 2,804.4 | B +6.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,591.8 | 2,551.9 | A +1.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,039.9 | 3,003.3 | A +1.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,010.3 | 2,946.5 | A +2.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,075.9 | 3,287.6 | B +6.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,089 | 3,248.3 | B +5.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,247.9 | 3,486.4 | B +7.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,216.7 | 3,241.2 | B +0.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,848.7 | 2,872.2 | B +0.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,908 | 3,005.4 | B +3.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,727.2 | 2,905.5 | B +6.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,733.8 | 2,692.5 | A +1.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,565.6 | 2,370.4 | A +8.2% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (46)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 36.4 | 31.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 31.6 | 31.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 17 | 15.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 17.9 | 17.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 135.4 | 95.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 98.5 | 102.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 61.7 | 57.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 63.8 | 65.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 62.9 | 60.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 67.7 | 62.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 59.9 | 61.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 35.7 | 33.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 36.3 | 36.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 41 | 38.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 105 | 100.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 109.6 | 105.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 78.1 | 74.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 78.2 | 82.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 135 | 122.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 204.3 | 181.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 197.9 | 190.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 84.3 | 76.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 85.7 | 86.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 85.3 | 80.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 282.6 | 254.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 237.5 | 231.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 102.3 | 94.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 103 | 104.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 134.5 | 123.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,932.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,779.5 | 1,644.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,743.5 | 1,639.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,710.8 | 1,712.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,687.2 | 1,667.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,722.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,024.1 | 2,168.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,869 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,765.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,765.2 | 1,780.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,732.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,793.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,831.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,153.3 | 3,023.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,836.3 | 2,976 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,061.5 | 3,213.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,454.1 | 2,685.1 | reference |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | B · GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 4,864 (CUDA cores) | 5,120 (CUDA cores) | B: 256 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,410 MHz | no data | no data for B |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,670 MHz | 1,290–1,620 MHz | not directly comparable |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 / GDDR6X | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 200 W (board power) | no data | no data for B |
| Recommended PSU | 600 W | no data | no data for B |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAmpere
equalShader units
A4,864 (CUDA cores)
B5,120 (CUDA cores)
B: 256 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,410 MHz
Bno data
no data for BBoost clock
A1,670 MHz
B1,290–1,620 MHz
not directly comparableClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6 / GDDR6X
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equal
Power and dimensions
Board power
A200 W (board power)
Bno data
no data for BTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A600 W
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: 8 GB GDDR6 / GDDR6X, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU?
It depends on the task: rendering and compute: results disagree.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPUchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.