GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3070: specs and benchmark comparison
ANVIDIA · Ampere
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 8 GB GDDR6 / GDDR6X
- 200 W
- PSU 600 W+
December 2, 2020 · $399 at launch
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +23.7%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 leads in this scenario (up to 23.7% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is better2
Board power 20 W lower200 W (board power) vs 220 W (board power)
Launch price $100 lower$399 vs $499
Where GeForce RTX 3070 is better14
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 12.9% lower27 s vs 30 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 11.9% lower16 s vs 18 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 19.7% lower114 s vs 137 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 15.9% lower53 s vs 62 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 17.8% lower56 s vs 66 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 20% lower33 s vs 39 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 19% lower93 s vs 110 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 23.2% lower67 s vs 83 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 20.7% lower154 s vs 186 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 18.6% lower74 s vs 88 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 23.7% lower226 s vs 280 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 20.9% lower102 s vs 123 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 15.5% faster3,198 samples/min vs 2,769 samples/min
Shader units 1,024 more5,888 (CUDA cores) vs 4,864 (CUDA cores)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 12.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti29.9 sGeForce RTX 307026.5 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 27A · 300100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 12.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
29.9 s · community measurement, sample 166 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 166 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.42–31.22; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
26.5 s · community measurement, sample 151 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 151 submissions (37 outliers excluded), interquartile range 26.29–26.91; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 11.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti18.4 sGeForce RTX 307016.4 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 16A · 18050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 11.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
18.4 s · community measurement, sample 129 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 129 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 17.36–19.16; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
16.4 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 16.23–16.71; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 19.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti136.6 sGeForce RTX 3070114.1 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 114A · 1370200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 19.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
136.6 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 131.88–139.28; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
114.1 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (26 outliers excluded), interquartile range 113.03–116.56; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 15.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti61.9 sGeForce RTX 307053.4 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 53A · 62050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 15.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
61.9 s · community measurement, sample 136 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 136 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.86–64.03; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
53.4 s · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 52.53–54.52; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 17.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti66 sGeForce RTX 307056 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 56A · 660100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 17.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
66 s · community measurement, sample 106 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 106 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.19–67.57; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
56 s · community measurement, sample 112 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 112 submissions (23 outliers excluded), interquartile range 55.47–57.13; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 20%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti39.1 sGeForce RTX 307032.6 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 33A · 39020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 20% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
39.1 s · community measurement, sample 79 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 79 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 38.5–40.04; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
32.6 s · community measurement, sample 87 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 87 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 32.13–33.58; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 19%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti110.3 sGeForce RTX 307092.7 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 93A · 1100200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 19% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
110.3 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 104.92–112.64; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
92.7 s · community measurement, sample 110 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 110 submissions (23 outliers excluded), interquartile range 91.73–94.24; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 23.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti82.6 sGeForce RTX 307067 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 67A · 83050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 23.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
82.6 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.89–84.17; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
67 s · community measurement, sample 78 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 78 submissions (13 outliers excluded), interquartile range 65.96–68.84; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 20.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti186.3 sGeForce RTX 3070154.3 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 154A · 1860200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 20.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
186.3 s · community measurement, sample 100 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 100 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 176.76–190.09; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
154.3 s · community measurement, sample 109 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 109 submissions (24 outliers excluded), interquartile range 152.83–157.43; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 18.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti88.2 sGeForce RTX 307074.4 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 74A · 880100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 18.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
88.2 s · community measurement, sample 85 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 85 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 85.07–89.99; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
74.4 s · community measurement, sample 84 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 84 submissions (12 outliers excluded), interquartile range 73.58–75.64; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 23.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti280.1 sGeForce RTX 3070226.4 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 226A · 28002505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 23.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
280.1 s · community measurement, sample 96 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 96 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 262.62–285.08; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
226.4 s · community measurement, sample 109 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 109 submissions (20 outliers excluded), interquartile range 223.23–229.38; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 20.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti123 sGeForce RTX 3070101.7 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 102A · 1230100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 20.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
123 s · community measurement, sample 75 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 121.11–125.74; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
101.7 s · community measurement, sample 85 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 85 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 99.6–104.68; submissions 2021-07-22 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 15.5%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti2,768.8 samples/minGeForce RTX 30703,198.3 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,769B · 3,19805,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is ahead by 15.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2,768.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 223 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 223 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2671.51–2854.8; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
3,198.3 samples/min · community measurement, sample 296 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 296 submissions (15 outliers excluded), interquartile range 3085.66–3284.94; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-09-05; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (35)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 36.4 | 34 | B +7.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 31.4 | 28.9 | B +8.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 17 | 15.3 | B +11.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 17.7 | 15.5 | B +14.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 135.4 | 111.8 | B +21.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 94.2 | 82.2 | B +14.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 61.7 | 52.6 | B +17.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 67.7 | 61.5 | B +10% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 62 | 55.3 | B +12.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 35.7 | 29.9 | B +19.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 105 | 95.3 | B +10.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 106.6 | 95.6 | B +11.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 78.1 | 64.1 | B +21.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 204.3 | 188.2 | B +8.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 192.7 | 168.6 | B +14.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 84.3 | 72.4 | B +16.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 282.6 | 247.8 | B +14.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 302.5 | 264.4 | B +14.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 102.3 | 84.1 | B +21.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,724.1 | 3,148.8 | B +15.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,644.4 | 3,087.8 | B +16.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,591.8 | 2,988.9 | B +15.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,153.3 | 3,536.1 | B +12.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,039.9 | 3,427 | B +12.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,061.5 | 3,363.8 | B +9.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,010.3 | 3,406.1 | B +13.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,075.9 | 3,542 | B +15.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,089 | 3,590.7 | B +16.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,247.9 | 3,774.5 | B +16.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 3,216.7 | 3,710.9 | B +15.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,848.7 | 3,257.7 | B +14.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,908 | 3,285.4 | B +13% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,727.2 | 3,136 | B +15% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,733.8 | 3,162.6 | B +15.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,565.6 | 3,166.4 | B +23.4% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (46)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 31.6 | 28.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 17.9 | 15.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 98.5 | 82.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 63.8 | 53.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 62.9 | 52.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 59.9 | 53.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 36.3 | 29.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 41 | 33.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 109.6 | 94.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 78.2 | 63.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 135 | 99.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 197.9 | 167.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 85.7 | 73.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 85.3 | 72.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 237.5 | 200.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 103 | 84.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 134.5 | 107.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,932.2 | 2,148.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,779.5 | 2,016.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,743.5 | 2,067.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,710.8 | 2,151.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,687.2 | 2,162.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,722.7 | 2,063.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 2,024.1 | 2,342.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,869 | 2,153 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,765.7 | 1,900.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,765.2 | 2,015.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,732.5 | 2,055.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,793.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,831.4 | 1,793.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,836.3 | 3,376.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,454.1 | 2,909.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 31.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 16 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 111.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 54.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 57.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 30.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 89.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 66.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 169.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 75.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 232.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 88.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,991.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,573.3 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | B · GeForce RTX 3070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 4,864 (CUDA cores) | 5,888 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,024 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,410 MHz | 1,500 MHz | B: 90 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,670 MHz | 1,730 MHz | B: 60 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 / GDDR6X | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 200 W (board power) | 220 W (board power) | B: 20 W higher |
| Recommended PSU | 600 W | 650 W | B: 50 W higher |
| Length (reference / Founders Edition)Partner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU. | no data | 242 mm | no data for A |
| Thickness (slots) | no data | 2 | no data for A |
| Power connectors (reference) | no data | 1x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE | no data for A |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAmpere
equalShader units
A4,864 (CUDA cores)
B5,888 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,024 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,410 MHz
B1,500 MHz
B: 90 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,670 MHz
B1,730 MHz
B: 60 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6 / GDDR6X
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equal
Power and dimensions
Board power
A200 W (board power)
B220 W (board power)
B: 20 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
A600 W
B650 W
B: 50 W higherLength (reference / Founders Edition)
Ano data
B242 mm
no data for APartner cards have different dimensions; check the specific SKU.
Thickness (slots)
Ano data
B2
no data for APower connectors (reference)
Ano data
B1x 8-pin (adapter to 1x 12-pin included) — FE
no data for A
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: 8 GB GDDR6 / GDDR6X, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
What power supply does the manufacturer recommend?
For NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, 600 W or more; for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 650 W or more. This is a recommendation for a typical system; also check the power connectors of the specific card model.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070checked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.