GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU vs GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +56.5%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU leads in this scenario (up to 56.5% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is better16
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 41.9% lower29 s vs 41 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 34.7% lower17 s vs 23 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 55.1% lower134 s vs 208 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 42.7% lower62 s vs 88 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 29.1% lower64 s vs 82 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 31.4% lower38 s vs 50 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 44% lower106 s vs 152 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 29.9% lower82 s vs 106 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 51.2% lower178 s vs 270 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 40.1% lower82 s vs 116 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 45.8% lower262 s vs 381 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 35.8% lower122 s vs 165 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 27.4% faster2,761 samples/min vs 2,166 samples/min
Shader units 1,280 more5,120 (CUDA cores) vs 3,840 (CUDA cores)
Video memory 2 GB more8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory bus 64 bit more256 bit vs 192 bit
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- B ahead by 41.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU40.8 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU28.7 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 29A · 410100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 41.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
40.8 s · community measurement, sample 186 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 186 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 38.78–44.93; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
28.7 s · community measurement, sample 116 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 116 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 27.25–32.03; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 34.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU23.2 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU17.3 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 17A · 23050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 34.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
23.2 s · community measurement, sample 87 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 87 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 22.67–25.18; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
17.3 s · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 16.84–19.15; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 55.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU208.3 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU134.3 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 134A · 2080200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 55.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
208.3 s · community measurement, sample 151 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 151 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 195.6–223.25; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
134.3 s · community measurement, sample 91 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 91 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 127.14–146.92; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 42.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU87.8 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU61.5 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 62A · 88050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 42.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.8 s · community measurement, sample 77 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 77 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 83.22–93.78; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.5 s · community measurement, sample 87 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 87 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 59.14–66.25; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 29.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU82.2 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU63.7 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 64A · 820100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 29.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
82.2 s · community measurement, sample 113 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 113 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 77.61–90.16; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
63.7 s · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 61–70.98; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 31.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU50.2 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU38.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 38A · 50020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 31.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
50.2 s · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 48.68–53.47; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
38.2 s · community measurement, sample 73 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 73 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 36.93–40.92; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 44%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU152 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU105.5 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 106A · 1520200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 44% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
152 s · community measurement, sample 111 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 111 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.23–167.3; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
105.5 s · community measurement, sample 64 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 64 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 100.91–115.04; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 29.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU106.3 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU81.9 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 82A · 106050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 29.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
106.3 s · community measurement, sample 54 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 54 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 103.13–111.66; submissions 2021-07-25 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.9 s · community measurement, sample 66 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 66 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 79.76–87.28; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 51.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU269.9 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU178.5 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 178A · 2700200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 51.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
269.9 s · community measurement, sample 110 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 110 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 252.84–291.83; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
178.5 s · community measurement, sample 74 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 74 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 169.45–196.61; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 40.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU115.6 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU82.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 82A · 1160100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 40.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
115.6 s · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 111.64–123.2; submissions 2021-07-25 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
82.5 s · community measurement, sample 78 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 78 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.04–88.43; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 45.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU381.3 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU261.6 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 262A · 38102505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 45.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
381.3 s · community measurement, sample 105 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 105 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 360.69–416.17; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
261.6 s · community measurement, sample 66 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 66 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 249.25–285.23; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 35.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU165.1 sGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU121.5 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 122A · 1650100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 35.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
165.1 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 157.62–173.86; submissions 2021-07-25 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
121.5 s · community measurement, sample 70 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 70 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 117.1–128.44; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 27.4%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU2,166.2 samples/minGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU2,760.6 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,166B · 2,76105,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is ahead by 27.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2,166.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 161 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 161 submissions (14 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1984.24–2305.62; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2,760.6 samples/min · community measurement, sample 118 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 118 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2251.76–2939.6; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-15; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (21)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 47.3 | 30.2 | B +56.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 23.4 | 16.5 | B +42.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 150.1 | 99.7 | B +50.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 92.7 | 60.6 | B +53% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 54.1 | 38.4 | B +41% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 169.7 | 122.2 | B +38.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 118.9 | 80.8 | B +47.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,182.2 | 2,914.8 | B +33.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,127.4 | 2,804.4 | B +31.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 1,971.6 | 2,551.9 | B +29.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,437.4 | 3,003.3 | B +23.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,444.1 | 2,946.5 | B +20.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,481.2 | 3,287.6 | B +32.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,527 | 3,248.3 | B +28.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,687.5 | 3,486.4 | B +29.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,665.6 | 3,241.2 | B +21.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,302.6 | 2,872.2 | B +24.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,303.4 | 3,005.4 | B +30.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,264.1 | 2,905.5 | B +28.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,197.2 | 2,692.5 | B +22.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,047.5 | 2,370.4 | B +15.8% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (47)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 76 | 31.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 48.9 | 31.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 22.5 | 15.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.4 | 17.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 255.8 | 95.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 165.5 | 102.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100.6 | 57.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 97 | 65.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 131.7 | 62.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 86.5 | 61.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 86 | 67.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 49.6 | 33.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 50.5 | 36.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 144.4 | 100.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 166.2 | 105.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 163.1 | 114.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 107.8 | 74.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 108.9 | 82.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 254.5 | 181.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 313.7 | 190.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 309.8 | 204.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 128.2 | 76.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 128.9 | 86.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 330.6 | 254.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 363.3 | 231.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 450 | 324.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 151 | 94.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 154.3 | 104.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 179.4 | 123.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,425.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,295.7 | 1,644.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,311.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,216.5 | 1,639.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,399.7 | 1,712.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 880.2 | 1,667.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,473.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,514.9 | 2,168.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,432.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,291.2 | 1,780.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,340.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,507.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,101.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,458.8 | 3,023.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,238.7 | 2,976 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,473 | 3,213.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,051.4 | 2,685.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,339.6 | — | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | B · GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 3,840 (CUDA cores) | 5,120 (CUDA cores) | B: 1,280 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,283–1,703 MHz | 1,290–1,620 MHz | not directly comparable |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB | B: 2 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 192 bit | 256 bit | B: 64 bit more |
Chip
Architecture
AAmpere
BAmpere
equalShader units
A3,840 (CUDA cores)
B5,120 (CUDA cores)
B: 1,280 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Boost clock
A1,283–1,703 MHz
B1,290–1,620 MHz
not directly comparableClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A6 GB
B8 GB
B: 2 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A192 bit
B256 bit
B: 64 bit more
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: 6 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPUchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
- Wikipedia (English) — release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.