GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: specs and benchmark comparison
BNVIDIA · Ampere
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 8 GB GDDR6 / GDDR6X
- 200 W
- PSU 600 W+
December 2, 2020 · $399 at launch
Short verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
B +88.1%NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads in this scenario (up to 88.1% in comparable benchmarks).
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is better0
No advantages found in our data.
Where GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is better14
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 50.9% lower30 s vs 45 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 58.8% lower18 s vs 29 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 14.1% lower137 s vs 156 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 69% lower62 s vs 105 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 37% lower66 s vs 90 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 29.9% lower39 s vs 51 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 34% lower110 s vs 148 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 26.1% lower83 s vs 104 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 37.7% lower186 s vs 257 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 53.6% lower88 s vs 135 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 37.4% lower280 s vs 385 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 49.5% lower123 s vs 184 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 23.9% faster2,769 samples/min vs 2,235 samples/min
Launch price $100 lower$399 vs $499
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- B ahead by 50.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.2 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti29.9 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 30A · 450100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 50.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.2 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.61–45.89; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
29.9 s · community measurement, sample 166 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 166 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.42–31.22; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 58.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER29.2 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti18.4 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 18A · 29050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 58.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
29.2 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.79–29.82; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
18.4 s · community measurement, sample 129 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 129 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 17.36–19.16; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 14.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER155.8 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti136.6 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
B · 137A · 1560200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 14.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
155.8 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 153.23–158.95; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
136.6 s · community measurement, sample 134 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 134 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 131.88–139.28; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-25; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 69%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER104.5 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti61.9 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 62A · 105050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 69% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
104.5 s · community measurement, sample 38 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 38 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 102.59–107.68; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
61.9 s · community measurement, sample 136 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 136 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 57.86–64.03; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 37%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER90.4 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti66 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 66A · 900100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 37% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
90.4 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.69–91.7; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
66 s · community measurement, sample 106 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 106 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 63.19–67.57; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 29.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER50.8 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti39.1 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 39A · 51020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 29.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
50.8 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 49.98–51.74; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
39.1 s · community measurement, sample 79 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 79 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 38.5–40.04; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 34%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER147.7 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti110.3 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 110A · 1480200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 34% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
147.7 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.41–149.78; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
110.3 s · community measurement, sample 99 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 99 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 104.92–112.64; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 26.1%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER104.1 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti82.6 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 83A · 104050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 26.1% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
104.1 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 103.53–106.27; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-20; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
82.6 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 80.89–84.17; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 37.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER256.6 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti186.3 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 186A · 2570200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 37.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
256.6 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 254.13–262.18; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
186.3 s · community measurement, sample 100 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 100 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 176.76–190.09; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 53.6%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER135.5 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti88.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 88A · 1350100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 53.6% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
135.5 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 134.34–137.84; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
88.2 s · community measurement, sample 85 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 85 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 85.07–89.99; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 37.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER384.8 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti280.1 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 280A · 38502505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 37.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
384.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 379–393.16; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
280.1 s · community measurement, sample 96 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 96 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 262.62–285.08; submissions 2021-07-24 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 49.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER183.9 sGeForce RTX 3060 Ti123 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 123A · 1840100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 49.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
183.9 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 180.06–189.97; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
123 s · community measurement, sample 75 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 75 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 121.11–125.74; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-03-01; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 23.9%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER2,234.5 samples/minGeForce RTX 3060 Ti2,768.8 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 2,235B · 2,76905,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is ahead by 23.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2,234.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2150.53–2296.29; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-11-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2,768.8 samples/min · community measurement, sample 223 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 223 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2671.51–2854.8; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (32)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 54.4 | 36.4 | B +49.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 52.2 | 31.4 | B +66.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.8 | 17 | B +51.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.5 | 17.7 | B +49.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 171.7 | 135.4 | B +26.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 177.3 | 94.2 | B +88.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 101 | 61.7 | B +63.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 99 | 67.7 | B +46.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 96.4 | 62 | B +55.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 45.5 | 35.7 | B +27.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 165.1 | 105 | B +57.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 157.8 | 106.6 | B +48.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 98.8 | 78.1 | B +26.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 305.5 | 204.3 | B +49.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 285.3 | 192.7 | B +48% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 128.8 | 84.3 | B +52.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 376.9 | 282.6 | B +33.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 434.6 | 302.5 | B +43.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 153.3 | 102.3 | B +49.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,189.4 | 2,724.1 | B +24.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,143.1 | 2,644.4 | B +23.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,079.7 | 2,591.8 | B +24.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,427.4 | 3,039.9 | B +25.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,447.3 | 3,010.3 | B +23% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,467.7 | 3,075.9 | B +24.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,394.9 | 3,089 | B +29% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,619 | 3,247.9 | B +24% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,604.6 | 3,216.7 | B +23.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,374.9 | 2,848.7 | B +20% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,262.8 | 2,908 | B +28.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,228.4 | 2,727.2 | B +22.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,225.8 | 2,733.8 | B +22.8% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (88)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 574.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 559.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 970.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 979.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 50.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 51.6 | 31.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 27.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.2 | 17.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 168.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 169.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 165.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 168 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 172.6 | 98.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 101.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 101.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100.2 | 63.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 103 | 62.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 88 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 88.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 90.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 93.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 91.3 | 59.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 43.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 43.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 44.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 43.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 45.5 | 36.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 51.5 | 41 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 153.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 154 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 153.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 161.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 154.6 | 109.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 82 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 83.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 80.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 79.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 98.4 | 78.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 172.6 | 135 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 287.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 288.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 290.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 290.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 283.7 | 197.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 130.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 132.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 131.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 128.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 129.8 | 85.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 130.6 | 85.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 382.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 383.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 377.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 383.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 360.5 | 237.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 167.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 166.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 161.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 160.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 152 | 103 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 192 | 134.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,556.4 | 1,779.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,531.1 | 1,743.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,580.6 | 1,710.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,546.7 | 1,687.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,562.2 | 1,869 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,569.9 | 1,765.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,460.8 | 1,831.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,522.5 | 3,153.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,413.7 | 3,061.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,072.4 | 2,454.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,123.5 | 2,565.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,338.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,932.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,722.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 2,024.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,765.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,732.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,793.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,836.3 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | B · GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU104-410-A1 | no data | no data for B |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | 4,864 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,605 MHz | 1,410 MHz | A: 195 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,770 MHz | 1,670 MHz | A: 100 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 / GDDR6X | differs |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 256 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 448 GB/s | no data | no data for B |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 215 W (TDP) | 200 W (board power) | not directly comparable |
| Recommended PSU | no data | 600 W | no data for A |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU104-410-A1
Bno data
no data for BArchitecture
ATuring
BAmpere
differsShader units
A2,560 (CUDA cores)
B4,864 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,605 MHz
B1,410 MHz
A: 195 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,770 MHz
B1,670 MHz
A: 100 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B8 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6 / GDDR6X
differsMemory bus
A256 bit
B256 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A448 GB/s
Bno data
no data for BExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A215 W (TDP)
B200 W (board power)
not directly comparableTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Recommended PSU
Ano data
B600 W
no data for A
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: 8 GB GDDR6 / GDDR6X, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads in every scenario with comparable benchmarks: rendering and compute. This does not imply an advantage in tasks without benchmarks.
See also
Data sources (3)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Tichecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.