GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: specs and benchmark comparison
Rendering and compute
depends on the taskBenchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is better4
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 33.7% lower156 s vs 208 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 5.2% lower257 s vs 270 s
Video memory 2 GB more8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory bus 64 bit more256 bit vs 192 bit
Where GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is better6
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 10.8% lower41 s vs 45 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 25.4% lower23 s vs 29 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 19% lower88 s vs 105 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 10% lower82 s vs 90 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 17.2% lower116 s vs 135 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 11.4% lower165 s vs 184 s
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- B ahead by 10.8%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER45.2 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU40.8 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
B · 41A · 450100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is ahead by 10.8% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
45.2 s · community measurement, sample 98 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 98 submissions (11 outliers excluded), interquartile range 44.61–45.89; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
40.8 s · community measurement, sample 186 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 186 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 38.78–44.93; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 25.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER29.2 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU23.2 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 23A · 29050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is ahead by 25.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
29.2 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 28.79–29.82; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-11; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
23.2 s · community measurement, sample 87 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 87 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 22.67–25.18; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 33.7%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER155.8 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU208.3 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
A · 156B · 2080200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 33.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
155.8 s · community measurement, sample 80 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 80 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 153.23–158.95; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
208.3 s · community measurement, sample 151 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 151 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 195.6–223.25; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 19%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER104.5 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU87.8 sPosition among tested models (14, OptiX)
B · 88A · 105050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is ahead by 19% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
104.5 s · community measurement, sample 38 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 38 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 102.59–107.68; submissions 2021-07-09 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.8 s · community measurement, sample 77 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 77 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 83.22–93.78; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 10%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER90.4 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU82.2 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 82A · 900100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is ahead by 10% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
90.4 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 88.69–91.7; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
82.2 s · community measurement, sample 113 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 113 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 77.61–90.16; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 1.2% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER50.8 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU50.2 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 50A · 51020406080Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 1.2% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
50.8 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 49.98–51.74; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
50.2 s · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (5 outliers excluded), interquartile range 48.68–53.47; submissions 2021-07-15 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 2.9% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER147.7 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU152 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
A · 148B · 1520200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 2.9% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
147.7 s · community measurement, sample 69 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 69 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.41–149.78; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
152 s · community measurement, sample 111 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 111 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 145.23–167.3; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 2.1% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER104.1 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU106.3 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
A · 104B · 106050100150200Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 2.1% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
104.1 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 103.53–106.27; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-20; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
106.3 s · community measurement, sample 54 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 54 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 103.13–111.66; submissions 2021-07-25 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 5.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER256.6 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU269.9 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
A · 257B · 2700200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ahead by 5.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
256.6 s · community measurement, sample 68 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 68 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 254.13–262.18; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
269.9 s · community measurement, sample 110 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 110 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 252.84–291.83; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 17.2%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER135.5 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU115.6 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 116A · 1350100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is ahead by 17.2% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
135.5 s · community measurement, sample 29 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 29 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 134.34–137.84; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
115.6 s · community measurement, sample 62 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 62 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 111.64–123.2; submissions 2021-07-25 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 0.9% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER384.8 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU381.3 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 381A · 38502505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 0.9% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
384.8 s · community measurement, sample 71 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 71 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 379–393.16; submissions 2021-07-12 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
381.3 s · community measurement, sample 105 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 105 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 360.69–416.17; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-02-27; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 11.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER183.9 sGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU165.1 sPosition among tested models (13, OptiX)
B · 165A · 1840100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is ahead by 11.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
183.9 s · community measurement, sample 30 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 30 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 180.06–189.97; submissions 2021-07-16 to 2022-02-10; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
165.1 s · community measurement, sample 56 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 56 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 157.62–173.86; submissions 2021-07-25 to 2022-02-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 3.2% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER2,234.5 samples/minGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU2,166.2 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
B · 2,166A · 2,23505,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. The 3.2% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2,234.5 samples/min · community measurement, sample 101 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 101 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2150.53–2296.29; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-11-02; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2,166.2 samples/min · community measurement, sample 161 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 161 submissions (14 outliers excluded), interquartile range 1984.24–2305.62; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-08-27; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (20)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 52.2 | 47.3 | B +10.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.5 | 23.4 | B +13.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 177.3 | 150.1 | B +18.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 103 | 92.7 | B +11.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 51.5 | 54.1 | A +5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 172.6 | 169.7 | B +1.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 130.6 | 118.9 | B +9.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,189.4 | 2,182.2 | A +0.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,143.1 | 2,127.4 | A +0.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,079.7 | 1,971.6 | A +5.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,427.4 | 2,437.4 | B +0.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,447.3 | 2,444.1 | A +0.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,467.7 | 2,481.2 | B +0.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,394.9 | 2,527 | B +5.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,619 | 2,687.5 | B +2.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,604.6 | 2,665.6 | B +2.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,374.9 | 2,302.6 | A +3.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,262.8 | 2,303.4 | B +1.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,228.4 | 2,264.1 | B +1.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,225.8 | 2,197.2 | A +1.3% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (101)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 574.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 559.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 970.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | 979.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 49.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 50.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 54.4 | 76 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 51.6 | 48.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 27.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 25.8 | 22.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 26.2 | 25.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 168.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 169.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 165.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 168 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 171.7 | 255.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 172.6 | 165.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 101.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 101.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 101 | 100.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 100.2 | 97 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 88 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 88.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 90.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 93.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 99 | 131.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 91.3 | 86.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 96.4 | 86 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 43.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 43.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 44.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 43.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 45.5 | 49.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 45.5 | 50.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 153.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 154 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 153.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 161.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 165.1 | 144.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 154.6 | 166.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 157.8 | 163.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 82 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | 83.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 80.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 79.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 98.8 | 107.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 98.4 | 108.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 287.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 288.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 290.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 290.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 305.5 | 254.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 283.7 | 313.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 285.3 | 309.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 130.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 132.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 131.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 128.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 128.8 | 128.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 129.8 | 128.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 382.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 383.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 377.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 383.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 376.9 | 330.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 360.5 | 363.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 434.6 | 450 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 167.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | 166.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 161.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 160.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 153.3 | 151 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 152 | 154.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 192 | 179.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,556.4 | 1,295.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,531.1 | 1,216.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,580.6 | 1,399.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,546.7 | 880.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,562.2 | 1,432.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,569.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 1,460.8 | 1,340.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,522.5 | 2,458.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,413.7 | 2,473 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,072.4 | 2,051.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,123.5 | 2,047.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 2,338.4 | 2,339.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,425.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,311.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,473.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,514.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,291.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,507.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,101.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 2,238.7 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | B · GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU104-410-A1 | no data | no data for B |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 2,560 (CUDA cores) | 3,840 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,605 MHz | no data | no data for B |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,770 MHz | 1,283–1,703 MHz | not directly comparable |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB | A: 2 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 192 bit | A: 64 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 448 GB/s | no data | no data for B |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 215 W (TDP) | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU104-410-A1
Bno data
no data for BArchitecture
ATuring
BAmpere
differsShader units
A2,560 (CUDA cores)
B3,840 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,605 MHz
Bno data
no data for BBoost clock
A1,770 MHz
B1,283–1,703 MHz
not directly comparableClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A8 GB
B6 GB
A: 2 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A256 bit
B192 bit
A: 64 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A448 GB/s
Bno data
no data for BExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A215 W (TDP)
Bno data
no data for BTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU have?
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: 6 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU?
It depends on the task: rendering and compute: results disagree.
See also
Data sources (3)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- NVIDIA — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPUchecked November 7, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.