GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop GPU: specs and benchmark comparison
Short verdict
In the available comparable benchmarks the difference is below the noticeable threshold, so no significant advantage was found.
Compare with AIRendering and compute
≈ parityThe difference in available benchmarks is below the noticeable threshold, so there is no significant advantage.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better1
Shader units 256 more1,280 (CUDA cores) vs 1,024 (CUDA cores)
Where GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop GPU is better1
Board power 45 W lower55 W (TDP) vs 100 W (TDP)
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions. Laptop chip results depend on the laptop model: its maker sets the power limit and cooling.
- 2.7% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER155.3 sGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop GPU159.5 sPosition among tested models (27, CUDA)
A · 155B · 1590100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 2.7% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
155.3 s · community measurement, sample 48 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 48 submissions (3 outliers excluded), interquartile range 151.89–157.88; submissions 2020-09-03 to 2021-06-21; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop GPU
159.5 s · community measurement, sample 20 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 20 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 155.16–160.43; submissions 2020-09-04 to 2021-04-28; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
Reference results (92)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 1,216.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 139.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 137.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 142 | 402.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 141.2 | 142.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 151.5 | 157.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 153 | 150.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 126.2 | 133.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 96.4 | 117.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 94.6 | 133.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 99.4 | 118.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 100.5 | 120 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 638.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 453.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 438 | 1,373.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 432.9 | 503.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 457.9 | 535.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 456.6 | 683.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 458.3 | 534.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 403.9 | 467.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 340.7 | 679 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 359.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 367.2 | 528.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 430.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 243.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 256.6 | 720.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 260.5 | 361.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 279.8 | 297.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 263.5 | 309.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 288.3 | 271.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 255.4 | 279.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 180.9 | 232.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 181.9 | 233.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 704.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 391.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 391.2 | 1,126.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 418.3 | 469.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 436.3 | 474 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 405.6 | 492.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 418.1 | 440.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | 386.4 | 404.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 218.9 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 239.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 217.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 1,367.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 782.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 791.5 | 2,287.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 795.8 | 868.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 859.5 | 936.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 803.3 | 1,004.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 830.2 | 864.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 703.3 | 780.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 528.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 546.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 545.3 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 2,390.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,927.6 | 5,168.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 2,197.9 | 1,899.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,909.2 | 1,882.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,483 | 2,078.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 1,510.9 | 2,216.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | 2,780.5 | 1,964.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 759.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 890.6 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 516.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 550.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 560 | 558.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 622.8 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 604.7 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 556.6 | 483.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 554.8 | 466.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 478.2 | 447.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 462.8 | 399.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 645.3 | 533.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 580.4 | 466.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 542.5 | 533.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 560.6 | 438.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 562.8 | 497.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 452.9 | 449.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 603.2 | 519.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 577.1 | 510.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 526.3 | 500 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 564.4 | 462.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 540 | 472 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 540.9 | 471.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 472.3 | 467.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 521.1 | 425.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 510.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 553.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 600.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 554.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | — | 511.7 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
Chip maker values. The laptop maker sets the power limit and clocks in each laptop.
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | B · GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop GPU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | TU116-250-KA-A1 | no data | no data for B |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | equal |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 1,280 (CUDA cores) | 1,024 (CUDA cores) | A: 256 more |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,530 MHz | 1,350 MHz | A: 180 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,725 MHz | 1,485 MHz | A: 240 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 4 GB | 4 GB | equal |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | equal |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit | equal |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 192 GB/s | 192 GB/s | equal |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 100 W (TDP) | 55 W (TDP) | A: 45 W higher |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data for A |
Chip
GPU chip
ATU116-250-KA-A1
Bno data
no data for BArchitecture
ATuring
BTuring
equalShader units
A1,280 (CUDA cores)
B1,024 (CUDA cores)
A: 256 moreShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,530 MHz
B1,350 MHz
A: 180 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,725 MHz
B1,485 MHz
A: 240 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A4 GB
B4 GB
equalMemory type
AGDDR6
BGDDR6
equalMemory bus
A128 bit
B128 bit
equalMemory bandwidth
A192 GB/s
B192 GB/s
equalExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A100 W (TDP)
B55 W (TDP)
A: 45 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
Ano data
BPCIe 3.0 x16
no data for A
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop GPU have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: 4 GB GDDR6, 128-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop GPU: 4 GB GDDR6, 128-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop GPU?
In the available comparable benchmarks the difference is below the noticeable threshold, so no significant advantage was found.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop GPU, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.