GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER: specs and benchmark comparison
Rendering and compute
depends on the taskBenchmark results disagree, so the choice depends on the specific task.
No comparable benchmarks yet: gaming: rasterization, gaming: ray tracing, power efficiency.
Advantages
Only measured and rated values: a noticeable benchmark gap and specs where more is better.
Where GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is better5
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 61% lower172 s vs 277 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 26.9% lower311 s vs 394 s
Video memory 3 GB more11 GB vs 8 GB
Memory bus 96 bit more352 bit vs 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 36.4 GB/s more484.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
Where GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is better7
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 96.5% lower32 s vs 63 s
Blender Benchmark 2.90 31.4% lower162 s vs 213 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 13.5% lower110 s vs 124 s
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1 22% lower181 s vs 220 s
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0 151.7% faster2,067 samples/min vs 821 samples/min
Board power 75 W lower175 W (TDP) vs 250 W (TDP)
Launch price $300 lower$399 vs $699
Benchmarks
Results are compared within one benchmark, one version and the same conditions.
- 1.5% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti56.2 sGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER57 sPosition among tested models (31, CUDA)
A · 56B · 570100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 1.5% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
56.2 s · community measurement, sample 76 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 76 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 55.4–57.39; submissions 2021-07-11 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
57 s · community measurement, sample 32 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 32 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 56.4–57.77; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 96.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti62.7 sGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER31.9 sPosition among tested models (20, OptiX)
B · 32A · 63050100150Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is ahead by 96.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
62.7 s · community measurement, sample 23 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 23 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 60.35–64.88; submissions 2021-07-14 to 2022-02-09; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
31.9 s · community measurement, sample 21 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 21 submissions (0 outliers excluded), interquartile range 31.4–33.3; submissions 2021-07-27 to 2022-02-23; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 61%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, classroom (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti172 sGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER276.9 sPosition among tested models (26, CUDA)
A · 172B · 2770200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 61% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
172 s · community measurement, sample 58 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 58 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 169.09–175.74; submissions 2021-07-19 to 2022-03-01; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
276.9 s · community measurement, sample 31 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 31 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 272.42–281.42; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 31.4%
Blender Benchmark 2.90
GPU, classroom (OPTIX) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti212.6 sGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER161.8 sPosition among tested models (15, OptiX)
B · 162A · 2130100200300400Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is ahead by 31.4% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
212.6 s · community measurement, sample 23 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 23 submissions (1 outliers excluded), interquartile range 203.94–221.54; submissions 2020-09-06 to 2022-01-26; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
161.8 s · community measurement, sample 37 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 37 submissions (9 outliers excluded), interquartile range 160.24–163.89; submissions 2020-09-02 to 2021-01-25; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 13.5%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti124.3 sGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER109.5 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
B · 110A · 1240100200300Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is ahead by 13.5% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
124.3 s · community measurement, sample 46 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 46 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 122.73–126.56; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
109.5 s · community measurement, sample 26 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 26 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 107.85–111.2; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 22%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, koro (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti220.4 sGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER180.7 sPosition among tested models (20, CUDA)
B · 181A · 2200200400600Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is ahead by 22% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
220.4 s · community measurement, sample 41 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 41 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 218.9–224.53; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
180.7 s · community measurement, sample 27 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 27 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 178.65–186.28; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- A ahead by 26.9%
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti310.6 sGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER394 sPosition among tested models (21, CUDA)
A · 311B · 3940200400600800Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ahead by 26.9% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
310.6 s · community measurement, sample 42 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 42 submissions (10 outliers excluded), interquartile range 308.52–315.53; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
394 s · community measurement, sample 24 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 24 submissions (4 outliers excluded), interquartile range 388.05–403.3; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- 3.6% difference, within the threshold
Blender Benchmark 2.93.1
GPU, victor (CUDA) · s, lower is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti521.3 sGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER503.2 sPosition among tested models (19, CUDA)
B · 503A · 52102505007501,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, s. The 3.6% difference is below the noticeable threshold (5%).
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
521.3 s · community measurement, sample 41 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 41 submissions (8 outliers excluded), interquartile range 514.79–527.59; submissions 2021-07-21 to 2022-02-24; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
503.2 s · community measurement, sample 25 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 25 submissions (2 outliers excluded), interquartile range 497.18–522.26; submissions 2021-07-10 to 2022-02-26; CUDA backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Render time of a single Cycles scene without synchronization. Median of submissions after filtering.
- B ahead by 151.7%
Blender Benchmark 4.5.0
GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) · samples/min, higher is better
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti821.4 samples/minGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER2,067.3 samples/minPosition among tested models (67, OptiX)
A · 821B · 2,06705,00010,00015,000Each dot is one model’s median in this benchmark. The scale starts at zero, samples/min. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is ahead by 151.7% in this benchmark.
About the measurement and source
- A · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
821.4 samples/min · community measurement, sample 57 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 57 submissions (6 outliers excluded), interquartile range 808.6–840.55; submissions 2025-07-18 to 2026-03-07; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
- B · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
2,067.3 samples/min · community measurement, sample 102 · November 14, 2026
Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation)
Median of 102 submissions (7 outliers excluded), interquartile range 2005.87–2124.27; submissions 2025-07-17 to 2026-03-07; OPTIX backend. Snapshot 2026-11-14.
difference = |A − B| ÷ the smaller value × 100%. The 5% noticeable threshold is a UX heuristic, not statistical significance.
Cycles render in Blender Benchmark. Median of the sum of samples per minute over three scenes after removing outliers.
Other comparable benchmarks (30)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 62.2 | 63.6 | A +2.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.1 | 65.7 | A +2.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 69.9 | 66.3 | B +5.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 61.2 | 30.6 | B +99.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 192.3 | 292.8 | A +52.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 194.8 | 299.2 | A +53.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 197.9 | 300.7 | A +51.9% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 123.4 | 119.7 | B +3.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 124.1 | 126 | A +1.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 127.4 | 123.7 | B +3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (CUDA) | 245.2 | 210.8 | B +16.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (CUDA) | 236 | 220.1 | B +7.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (CUDA) | 216.7 | 191.3 | B +13.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 329.7 | 450.2 | A +36.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 337.5 | 449.2 | A +33.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 359 | 461.2 | A +28.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (CUDA) | 487.7 | 522.2 | A +7.1% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (CUDA) | 478.1 | 538.5 | A +12.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (CUDA) | 472.4 | 510.2 | A +8% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 821.5 | 2,099.4 | B +155.6% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 868 | 2,307.1 | B +165.8% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 883.9 | 2,180.5 | B +146.7% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 878.4 | 2,288.4 | B +160.5% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 879.8 | 2,315.7 | B +163.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 889.7 | 2,378.7 | B +167.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 889.8 | 2,450.3 | B +175.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 830.7 | 2,138.1 | B +157.4% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 842.2 | 2,158.4 | B +156.3% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 829 | 2,049 | B +147.2% |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 820.8 | 2,113.6 | B +157.5% |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Reference results (104)
| Benchmark | A | B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 529.5 | 1,076.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (CUDA) | 532.3 | 1,070.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 62.5 | 63.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 63.2 | 61.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 65.4 | 66 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | 64.3 | 69.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 61.8 | 30.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | 61.3 | 31.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 189.1 | 298.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (CUDA) | 192.2 | 299.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 193.9 | 305.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (CUDA) | 185 | 320.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 216.5 | 166.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 221.1 | 171.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | 221.4 | 170.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.6 | 115.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 121.3 | 115.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 122.4 | 113 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | 119.1 | 120.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 115.4 | 55.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 115.5 | 55.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 119.4 | 63.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | 117.4 | 60.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (CUDA) | 245.9 | 207.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (CUDA) | 248.4 | 209.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (CUDA) | 214.6 | 179.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (CUDA) | 213.3 | 188.6 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 132.1 | 118 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 133.7 | 119.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 172.2 | 206.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | 135.1 | 124.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 331 | 439.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 330.5 | 446.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 341.4 | 417 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | 334.7 | 430.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 330.9 | 189.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 326.6 | 193.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 333.8 | 195.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | 334.1 | 196.7 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (CUDA) | 493.3 | 520.3 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (CUDA) | 491.8 | 528.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (CUDA) | 460.2 | 481.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (CUDA) | 521.5 | 566.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 447.9 | 230.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.91.2GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 436.1 | 232.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.92GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 480.3 | 276.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.93.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | 462.5 | 264.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 936.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 873.8 | 1,408 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 895.1 | 1,445.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 976.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.3.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 931.9 | 1,328.5 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 928.2 | 1,442.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.6.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 960.5 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 886.4 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 905.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.4.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 925.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.5.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | 969.1 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 685.3 | 1,993.1 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 699.6 | 1,928.2 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.0.1GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 935.9 | 2,487.8 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 3.1.2GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 780.2 | — | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 3.2.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 888.7 | 2,259.4 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 726.9 | 1,879.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 5.1.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (OptiX / HIP / oneAPI / Metal) | 695.2 | 1,883.9 | reference |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 1,716.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, barbershop_interior (OPTIX) | — | 1,792.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (CUDA) | — | 71.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 26.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 30.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 30.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 29.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, bmw27 (OPTIX) | — | 31.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (CUDA) | — | 350.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 167.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 161.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 159.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 158.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, classroom (OPTIX) | — | 169.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (CUDA) | — | 143.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 57.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 56 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 58.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 56.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, fishy_cat (OPTIX) | — | 57.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (CUDA) | — | 222.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 103.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 110.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 106 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 101.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, koro (OPTIX) | — | 123.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (CUDA) | — | 543.8 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 192.4 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 189.9 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 190.3 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 183.7 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, pavillon_barcelona (OPTIX) | — | 193.6 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (CUDA) | — | 604.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 260.1 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.81aGPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 260.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.82GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 250.5 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.83GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 245.2 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 2.90.1GPU, victor (OPTIX) | — | 244 | no pair |
| Blender Benchmark 4.0.0GPU, sum of scenes monster + junkshop + classroom (CUDA) | — | 1,380.9 | no pair |
Each benchmark version has its own scale: numbers are compared only within a row.
Specifications
| Specification | A · GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | B · GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | |||
| GPU chip | GP102-350-K1-A1 | TU106-410-A1 | differs |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing | differs |
| Shader unitsShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture. | 3,584 (CUDA cores) | 2,176 (CUDA cores) | not directly comparable |
| Clocks | |||
| Base clock | 1,481 MHz | 1,470 MHz | A: 11 MHz more |
| Boost clockClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit. | 1,582 MHz | 1,650 MHz | B: 68 MHz more |
| Memory | |||
| Video memory | 11 GB | 8 GB | A: 3 GB more |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 | differs |
| Memory bus | 352 bit | 256 bit | A: 96 bit more |
| Memory bandwidthExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently. | 484.4 GB/s | 448 GB/s | A: 36.4 GB/s more |
| Power and dimensions | |||
| Board powerTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops. | 250 W (TDP) | 175 W (TDP) | A: 75 W higher |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data | no data for B |
Chip
GPU chip
AGP102-350-K1-A1
BTU106-410-A1
differsArchitecture
APascal
BTuring
differsShader units
A3,584 (CUDA cores)
B2,176 (CUDA cores)
not directly comparableShader unit counts are comparable only within one architecture.
Clocks
Base clock
A1,481 MHz
B1,470 MHz
A: 11 MHz moreBoost clock
A1,582 MHz
B1,650 MHz
B: 68 MHz moreClocks of different architectures do not reflect performance directly. For laptop chips, the clock depends on the laptop’s power limit.
Memory
Video memory
A11 GB
B8 GB
A: 3 GB moreMemory type
AGDDR5X
BGDDR6
differsMemory bus
A352 bit
B256 bit
A: 96 bit moreMemory bandwidth
A484.4 GB/s
B448 GB/s
A: 36.4 GB/s moreExcludes cache (Infinity Cache / L2), which affects effective bandwidth differently.
Power and dimensions
Board power
A250 W (TDP)
B175 W (TDP)
A: 75 W higherTGP (NVIDIA) and TBP (AMD/Intel) are calculated differently; higher is not better. For laptops, the chip maker sets the range and the laptop maker picks the value, so the same chip behaves differently in different laptops.
Interface
APCIe 3.0 x16
Bno data
no data for B
“More” does not always mean “better”: higher power draw or size is a system requirement, not an advantage (such bars are dimmed).
Compare with AI
An AI model reviews the specs and benchmarks of this pair and gives a plain-language verdict on who each model suits.
Questions and answers
How much video memory do NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER have?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: 11 GB GDDR5X, 352-bit bus. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER: 8 GB GDDR6, 256-bit bus.
Which is faster: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER?
It depends on the task: rendering and compute: results disagree.
See also
Data sources (2)
- Wikipedia (English) — specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, release date and launch pricechecked November 14, 2026
- Blender Open Data (Blender Foundation) — benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.81a, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.82, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.83, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.91.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.92, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.93.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 2.90.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.0.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.2.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.6.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.1.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.5.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.1, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.2.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.1.2, benchmark Blender Benchmark 3.4.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 4.3.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.0.0, benchmark Blender Benchmark 5.1.0checked November 14, 2026
How we compare: methodology. Where the data comes from: sources.